Clapp Benjamin, Grasso Samuel, Gamez Jesus, Edwards Jensen, Dodoo Cristopher, Portela Ray, Ghanem Omar M, Davis Brian R
Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas.
Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 May;18(5):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.01.014. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
Two large nationwide databases collect data on common operations in the United States. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) collects bariatric data, whereas the National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) gathers details on a broader range of general surgical cases.
Evaluate the differences in rates of complications between both databases regarding Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
National databases, United States.
We evaluated the MBSAQIP and NSQIP from 2017 to 2019 using the procedure codes 43644 and 43775. Fifteen common complications were evaluated. Propensity-matched analyses (PMAs) were done to control for differences across databases. Significantly different variables after a PMA were included in multivariable models. The data were examined for differences between the 2 databases before and after the PMA, with and without adjustment for operation type.
There were 483,361 cases reported in the MBSAQIP and 57,598 in the NSQIP. PMA matched 57,479 cases for each database. Seven complications were different, with higher rates reported in the NSQIP than in the MBSAQIP: myocardial infarction, sepsis, organ/space surgical site infections, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infections, pulmonary embolism, ventilator dependence >48 hours, and pneumonia. When adjusting for the procedure performed, sleeve gastrectomy in the NSQIP had higher rates of organ/space surgical site infections, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, and death. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the NSQIP had higher rates of organ/space surgical site infections, ventilator dependence >48 hours, urinary tract infections, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis.
When compared with the MBSAQIP, the NSQIP reports higher rates of bariatric complications. Further studies are needed to confirm the reasons behind this.
美国有两个大型的全国性数据库收集常见手术的数据。代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进项目(MBSAQIP)收集减重手术数据,而国家质量改进项目(NSQIP)收集更广泛的普通外科病例细节。
评估两个数据库中关于Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的并发症发生率差异。
美国国家数据库。
我们使用手术编码43644和43775评估了2017年至2019年的MBSAQIP和NSQIP。评估了15种常见并发症。进行倾向匹配分析(PMA)以控制数据库之间的差异。PMA后有显著差异的变量被纳入多变量模型。在PMA前后,对两个数据库的数据进行了检查,包括有无手术类型调整的情况。
MBSAQIP报告了483361例病例,NSQIP报告了57598例病例。PMA为每个数据库匹配了57479例病例。有7种并发症存在差异,NSQIP报告的发生率高于MBSAQIP:心肌梗死、败血症、器官/腔隙手术部位感染、深静脉血栓形成、尿路感染、肺栓塞、机械通气依赖>48小时和肺炎。在对所实施的手术进行调整后,NSQIP中袖状胃切除术的器官/腔隙手术部位感染、深静脉血栓形成、败血症和死亡发生率更高。NSQIP中Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的器官/腔隙手术部位感染、机械通气依赖>48小时、尿路感染、心肌梗死、深静脉血栓形成和败血症发生率更高。
与MBSAQIP相比,NSQIP报告的减重手术并发症发生率更高。需要进一步研究以证实其背后的原因。