• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与和不参与结直肠癌筛查的原因。

Reasons for participation and non-participation in colorectal cancer screening.

机构信息

Research Unit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Hospital South West Jutland, Unit for Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Research Unit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.010
PMID:35248951
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present analysis is to identify the reasons for accepting or rejecting the invitation to be screened by the Faecal Immunochemical Test as part of the free Danish screening programme for colorectal cancer (CRC).

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional representative survey of 15,072 Danish citizens aged 50-80 years was collected in 2019 via a Web-based questionnaire administered by Statistics Denmark. Among the net sample of 6807 respondents (45%), 177 were excluded because of current treatment for colorectal disease.

METHODS

To determine the reasons for accepting or refusing the invitation to be screened for CRC, a latent class analysis was conducted, which allowed participants to provide several reasons for acceptance or rejection of screening.

RESULTS

The most important reason for participating in CRC screening was the active public programme. A further reason for participation was the perceived risk for CRC, mainly in combination with the public programme. The reasons for participation did not differ between individuals who had participated and those who intended to participate when offered. Among participants who declined screening, the most frequent reasons were that they forgot to participate or that they were concerned about the unpleasant test procedure. Among individuals who intended to decline screening, a perceived low risk for CRC was the most frequently cited reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendation from a general practitioner (GP) was not given as a frequent reason for CRC screening participation which is discussed as a challenge to participation rates in population based screening program The main reasons reported for non-participation in CRC screening (i.e. forgot to participate or the unpleasant test procedure) might be addressed by a stronger endorsement from GPs.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在确定接受或拒绝接受粪便免疫化学检测筛查邀请的原因,这是丹麦免费结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划的一部分。

研究设计

2019 年,通过丹麦统计局管理的网络问卷调查,对 15072 名年龄在 50-80 岁的丹麦公民进行了横断面代表性调查。在 6807 名应答者的净样本(45%)中,有 177 名因目前患有结直肠疾病而被排除在外。

方法

为了确定接受或拒绝 CRC 筛查邀请的原因,进行了潜在类别分析,允许参与者提供接受或拒绝筛查的多个原因。

结果

参与 CRC 筛查的最重要原因是积极的公共计划。另一个参与的原因是对 CRC 的感知风险,主要与公共计划相结合。对于已经参与和打算在提供时参与的个体,参与的原因没有差异。在拒绝筛查的参与者中,最常见的原因是他们忘记参与或担心测试过程不愉快。在打算拒绝筛查的个体中,感知到的 CRC 低风险是最常被提及的原因。

结论

全科医生(GP)的推荐不是 CRC 筛查参与的常见原因,这被认为是参与人群筛查计划率的一个挑战。报告的非参与 CRC 筛查的主要原因(即忘记参与或测试过程不愉快)可能通过 GP 的更有力支持来解决。

相似文献

1
Reasons for participation and non-participation in colorectal cancer screening.参与和不参与结直肠癌筛查的原因。
Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.基于人群的免疫化学粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌:两种邀请策略的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):e317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 5.
3
To do or not to do - a survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer.做还是不做 - 一项关于与参与丹麦结直肠癌筛查计划相关因素的调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06023-6.
4
Colorectal cancer screening participation among citizens not recommended to be screened: a cohort study.不推荐进行筛查的公民的结直肠癌筛查参与情况:一项队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 May 20;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02331-9.
5
Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.丹麦结直肠癌筛查项目中,全科医疗诊断活动的差异及受邀个体的检查结果:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):281-290. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487378. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
6
Low priority main reason not to participate in a colorectal cancer screening program with a faecal occult blood test.不参与粪便潜血试验结直肠癌筛查项目的低优先级主要原因。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Dec;30(4):461-5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn063. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
7
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.目标人群对捷克共和国结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1132-1141. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132.
8
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
9
Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study.丹麦不同社会人口学群体中结直肠癌筛查的差异效应:一项基于登记处的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Mar;60(3):323-332. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1869829. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Men to Take Control of Their Own Health: Development and Validation of the Men's Response to Colorectal Cancer Screening Scale (MR-CCSS).赋予男性掌控自身健康的能力:男性对结直肠癌筛查量表(MR-CCSS)的开发与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;13(12):1433. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121433.
2
Recent trends in self-reported utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test in Europe: analysis of the European Health Interview Surveys 2013-2015 and 2018-2020.欧洲结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验自我报告使用率的近期趋势:对2013 - 2015年及2018 - 2020年欧洲健康访谈调查的分析
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01247-4.
3
Colorectal Cancer Screening using Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Testing (iFOBT) in Urban-Poor Communities in Cheras, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
马来西亚蕉赖城市贫困社区采用免疫化学粪便潜血试验(iFOBT)进行结直肠癌筛查:一项横断面研究。
Malays J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;32(1):154-168. doi: 10.21315/mjms-09-2024-726. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Faecal Volatile Organic Compounds to Detect Colorectal Neoplasia in Lynch Syndrome-A Prospective Longitudinal Multicentre Study.粪便挥发性有机化合物用于检测林奇综合征中的结直肠肿瘤——一项前瞻性纵向多中心研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jan;61(1):145-158. doi: 10.1111/apt.18328. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
5
Serum biomarkers REG1A and REG3A combined with the traditional CEA represent a novel nomogram for the screening and risk stratification of colorectal cancer.血清生物标志物REG1A和REG3A与传统的癌胚抗原(CEA)相结合,代表了一种用于结直肠癌筛查和风险分层的新型列线图。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan;27(1):277-290. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03566-6. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text-message reminders and telephone patient navigation to improve the uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among non-responders in London: a randomised controlled trial protocol.比较短信提醒和电话患者导航在提高伦敦未应答者粪便免疫化学检测筛查参与度方面的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 23;14(6):e079482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079482.
7
Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation.为什么人们选择不参与筛查?房颤筛查不参与的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2216-2227. doi: 10.1111/hex.13819. Epub 2023 Jul 14.