Suppr超能文献

比较短信提醒和电话患者导航在提高伦敦未应答者粪便免疫化学检测筛查参与度方面的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验方案。

Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text-message reminders and telephone patient navigation to improve the uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among non-responders in London: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

机构信息

University College London, London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 23;14(6):e079482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079482.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Participation in bowel cancer screening is lower in regions where there is high ethnic diversity and/or socioeconomic deprivation. Interventions, such as text message reminders and patient navigation (PN), have the potential to increase participation in these areas. As such, there is interest in the comparative effectiveness of these interventions to increase bowel cancer screening participation, as well as their relative cost-effectiveness.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will use a three-arm randomised controlled trial design to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text message reminders and PN to increase the uptake of bowel cancer screening in London. Participants will be individuals who have not returned a completed faecal immunochemical test kit within 13 weeks of receiving a routine invitation from the London bowel cancer screening hub. Participants will be randomised (in a 1:1:1 ratio) to receive either (1) usual care (ie, 'no intervention'), (2) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by repeated text message reminders at 15, 17 and 19 weeks (in the event of non-response) or (3) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by PN telephone calls at 15, 17 and 19 weeks in the event of non-response. The primary endpoint will be participation in bowel cancer screening, defined as 'the return of a completed kit by week 24'. Statistical analysis will use multivariate logistic regression and will incorporate pairwise comparisons of all three groups, adjusted for multiple testing.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approvals to conduct the research have been obtained from University College London's Joint Research Office (Ref: 150666), the Screening Research, Innovation and Development Advisory Committee ('RIDAC', Ref: 2223 014 BCSP Kerrison), the Health Research Authority (Ref: 22/WM/0212) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (Ref: 22/CAG/0140). Results will be conveyed to stakeholders, notably those managing the screening programme and published in peer-reviewed journals/presented at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN17245519.

摘要

简介

在种族多样性高和/或社会经济贫困的地区,参与肠癌筛查的比例较低。短信提醒和患者导航(PN)等干预措施有可能增加这些地区的参与度。因此,人们对这些干预措施提高肠癌筛查参与率的相对有效性以及相对成本效益感兴趣。

方法与分析

本研究将采用三臂随机对照试验设计,比较短信提醒和 PN 对增加伦敦地区肠癌筛查参与率的效果和成本效益。参与者将是在收到伦敦肠癌筛查中心常规邀请后 13 周内未返回完整粪便免疫化学检测试剂盒的个人。参与者将以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配(1)接受常规护理(即“无干预”),(2)在 13 周时收到短信提醒,然后在 15、17 和 19 周(如果未回复)重复发送短信提醒,或(3)在 13 周时收到短信提醒,然后在 15、17 和 19 周(如果未回复)进行 PN 电话随访。主要终点是参与肠癌筛查,定义为“在第 24 周前返回完整试剂盒”。统计分析将使用多变量逻辑回归,并将同时比较所有三组,调整多次测试。

伦理与传播

开展研究的批准已从伦敦大学学院联合研究办公室(Ref:150666)、筛查研究、创新和发展咨询委员会(RIDAC,Ref:2223 014 BCSP Kerrison)、卫生研究管理局(Ref:22/WM/0212)和保密咨询小组(Ref:22/CAG/0140)获得。结果将传达给利益相关者,特别是管理筛查计划的利益相关者,并在同行评议期刊上发表/在学术会议上展示。

试验注册号

ISRCTN17245519。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83b3/11328611/99007b9cc94c/bmjopen-14-6-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验