• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋予男性掌控自身健康的能力:男性对结直肠癌筛查量表(MR-CCSS)的开发与验证

Empowering Men to Take Control of Their Own Health: Development and Validation of the Men's Response to Colorectal Cancer Screening Scale (MR-CCSS).

作者信息

Jašić Vesna, Prosen Mirko, Ličen Sabina

机构信息

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;13(12):1433. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121433.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13121433
PMID:40565460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12192645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite the proven effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening, men are less likely to participate than women, with emotional, behavioural and informational barriers contributing to this disparity. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Men's Response to Colorectal Cancer Screening Scale (MR-CCSS), a gender-sensitive instrument for measuring key factors that influence the participation of men in colorectal cancer screening.

METHODS

The scale was developed through a structured process that included qualitative data from focus groups ( = 20 men) and expert review ( = 11 professionals). Initial item pools were refined based on indices of content validity (I-CVI ≥ 0.78; S-CVI/Ave ≥ 0.90), resulting in a 23-item scale. The MR-CCSS was administered to 289 Slovenian men aged 50-74 years, and its psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability tests.

RESULTS

The EFA revealed a five-factor structure. Together, these factors explained 61.9% of the total variance. The CFA confirmed the robustness of the model (CFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.910 and RMSEA = 0.056). The internal consistency was acceptable to good, with Cronbach's alpha between 0.665 (factor 4) and 0.833 (factor 5) for the subscales and 0.863 for the total scale. The ROC analysis showed moderate predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.702), with an optimal cut-off value of 92.5 (sensitivity = 0.782 and specificity = 0.509) for participation in screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR-CCSS is a valid and reliable tool for identifying barriers to colorectal cancer screening in men. Its use can serve as a basis for gender-specific interventions, customised health education and strategies to improve screening equity.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管结直肠癌筛查已被证明有效,但男性参与筛查的可能性低于女性,情绪、行为和信息方面的障碍导致了这种差异。本研究的目的是开发并验证男性对结直肠癌筛查的反应量表(MR - CCSS),这是一种对性别敏感的工具,用于测量影响男性参与结直肠癌筛查的关键因素。

方法

该量表通过结构化过程开发,包括来自焦点小组(20名男性)的定性数据和专家评审(11名专业人员)。根据内容效度指标(I - CVI≥0.78;S - CVI/Ave≥0.90)对初始项目池进行完善,形成一个包含23个条目的量表。对289名年龄在50 - 74岁的斯洛文尼亚男性施测MR - CCSS,并使用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和信度测试来评估其心理测量特性。

结果

探索性因素分析揭示了一个五因素结构。这些因素共同解释了总方差的61.9%。验证性因素分析证实了模型的稳健性(CFI = 0.928,TLI = 0.910,RMSEA = 0.056)。内部一致性良好,分量表的Cronbach's alpha在0.665(因素4)至0.833(因素5)之间,总量表为0.863。受试者工作特征分析显示预测准确性中等(AUC = 0.702),参与筛查的最佳临界值为92.5(敏感性 = 0.782,特异性 = 0.509)。

结论

MR - CCSS是识别男性结直肠癌筛查障碍的有效且可靠的工具。其应用可为针对性别的干预措施、定制化健康教育以及改善筛查公平性的策略提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc5/12192645/69bf56e8890c/healthcare-13-01433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc5/12192645/69bf56e8890c/healthcare-13-01433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc5/12192645/69bf56e8890c/healthcare-13-01433-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Empowering Men to Take Control of Their Own Health: Development and Validation of the Men's Response to Colorectal Cancer Screening Scale (MR-CCSS).赋予男性掌控自身健康的能力:男性对结直肠癌筛查量表(MR-CCSS)的开发与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;13(12):1433. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121433.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
9
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
10
Validation of the Perceived Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence (PEDIA) Scale Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender and Nonbinary Persons: Cross-Sectional Study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系者、跨性别者和非二元性别者中抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性感知障碍量表(PEDIA)的验证:横断面研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 27;11:e67005. doi: 10.2196/67005.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging Lifestyle and Screening for Cancer Prevention: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cancer-Related Lifestyle and Screening Attitudes in Adults.连接生活方式与癌症预防筛查:对成年人癌症相关生活方式及筛查态度的综合分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 16;61(3):510. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030510.
2
Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.结直肠癌筛查、诊断和治疗中的性别差异。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03801-0.
3
Assessing Barriers to Cancer Screening and Early Detection in Older Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Oncology Nursing Practice Implications.
评估沙特阿拉伯老年人癌症筛查和早期检测的障碍:肿瘤护理实践启示的混合方法研究
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 8;31(12):7872-7889. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31120580.
4
The relationship between men's health literacy levels and their health beliefs and attitudes towards prostate cancer screening: A case study in a rural area.男性健康素养水平与其对前列腺癌筛查的健康信念和态度之间的关系:农村地区的案例研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 26;32(9):612. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08802-x.
5
Adherence to Masculinity Norms and Depression Symptoms Among Israeli Men: The Moderating Role of Psychological Flexibility.坚持男子气概规范与以色列男性的抑郁症状:心理灵活性的调节作用。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241253820. doi: 10.1177/15579883241253820.
6
The Importance of Gender-Sensitive Health Care in the Context of Pain, Emergency and Vaccination: A Narrative Review.疼痛、急诊与疫苗接种背景下性别敏感型医疗保健的重要性:一项叙述性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;21(1):13. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010013.
7
Operationalising masculinities in theories and practices of gender-transformative health interventions: a scoping review.将男性气质纳入性别转换健康干预理论和实践的操作化研究:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jul 27;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01955-x.
8
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌(CRC)筛查对降低全因死亡率和CRC特异性死亡率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;15(7):1948. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071948.
9
Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies.在欧洲实施有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划——系统评价决定因素和策略的方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02193-6.
10
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.2020年和2040年全球结直肠癌负担:来自全球癌症负担(GLOBOCAN)的发病率和死亡率估计
Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736. Epub 2022 Sep 8.