• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration.记录患者和提供者在提出随机对照试验时的偏好:定性探索。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 6;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01549-1.
2
Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers.过渡到乳腺癌生存:患者、癌症专家和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S459-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1000-2.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
4
Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review.乳腺癌生存者照护计划的使用和影响:系统评价。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Nov;28(6):1292-1317. doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01267-4. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
5
Breast and prostate cancer survivors' experiences of patient-centered cancer follow-up care from primary care physicians and oncologists.乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者对初级保健医生和肿瘤学家提供的以患者为中心的癌症后续护理的体验。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Oct;10(5):906-14. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0537-4. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Childhood Cancer Survivorship Care: Multiperspective Interviews.初级保健医生在儿童癌症生存者护理中的作用:多视角访谈。
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):710-719. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0103. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.个性化癌症治疗后护理:乳腺癌良好生存者需求和偏好的横断面调查。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e138-e146. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4131. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Evaluating a nurse-led survivorship care package (SurvivorCare) for bowel cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估一种护士主导的结直肠癌生存者照护方案(SurvivorCare):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Aug 19;14:260. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-260.
9
Supporting models to transition breast cancer survivors to primary care: formative evaluation of a cancer care Ontario initiative.支持乳腺癌幸存者向初级保健过渡的模式:安大略癌症护理计划的形成性评估
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e288-95. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003822. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel approaches to support breast cancer survivorship care models.支持乳腺癌生存者照护模式的新方法。
Breast. 2017 Dec;36:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: Practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians.乳腺癌治疗后的随访:家庭医生生存护理实用指南。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):805-811.
3
Peer-counseling for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A randomized community/research collaboration trial.针对新诊断出乳腺癌的女性的同伴咨询:一项随机社区/研究合作试验。
Cancer. 2016 Aug 1;122(15):2408-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30036. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
The use of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review.戈丁-谢泼德休闲时间身体活动问卷在肿瘤学研究中的应用:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Aug 12;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7.
5
Discharge to Primary Care for Survivorship Follow-Up: How Are Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Faring?《初级保健随访中的出院:早期乳腺癌患者的情况如何?》
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Jun;13(6):762-71. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0091.
6
Choosing Wisely Canada cancer list: ten low-value or harmful practices that should be avoided in cancer care.明智选择加拿大癌症清单:癌症护理中应避免的十种低价值或有害做法。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e296-303. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004325.
7
Supporting models to transition breast cancer survivors to primary care: formative evaluation of a cancer care Ontario initiative.支持乳腺癌幸存者向初级保健过渡的模式:安大略癌症护理计划的形成性评估
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e288-95. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003822. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
8
Mindfulness-based cancer recovery and supportive-expressive therapy maintain telomere length relative to controls in distressed breast cancer survivors.基于正念的癌症康复和支持性表达疗法与对照组相比,能维持苦恼的乳腺癌幸存者的端粒长度。
Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):476-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29063. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
9
Transitioning patients to survivorship care: a systematic review.将患者过渡到癌症 survivorship 护理:一项系统综述。 (注:这里“survivorship care”直译为“癌症 survivorship 护理”,“癌症 survivorship”指癌症患者在治疗后进入的长期生存阶段,包括对患者身体、心理、社会等多方面的支持护理,是医学领域特定术语,中文表述可能因语境和专业习惯略有差异)
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Nov 1;41(6):615-25. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.615-625.
10
Actigraphy-measured sleep disruption as a predictor of survival among women with advanced breast cancer.活动记录仪测量的睡眠中断作为晚期乳腺癌女性生存的预测指标。
Sleep. 2014 May 1;37(5):837-42. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3642.

记录患者和提供者在提出随机对照试验时的偏好:定性探索。

Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration.

机构信息

Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St. SW, AB, T2S 3C1, Calgary, Canada.

Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 St. NW, AB, T2N 4N2, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 6;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01549-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01549-1
PMID:35249528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8898414/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) are living longer, increasing the number of patients receiving post-treatment follow-up care. Best-practice survivorship models recommend transitioning ESBC patients from oncology-provider (OP) care to community-based care. While developing materials for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the feasibility of a nurse-led Telephone Survivorship Clinic (TSC) for a smooth transition of ESBC survivors to follow-up care, we explored patients' and OPs' reactions to several of our proposed methods.

METHODS

We used a qualitative study design with thematic analysis and a two-pronged approach. We interviewed OPs, seeking feedback on ways to recruit their ESBC patients for the trial, and ESBC patients, seeking input on a questionnaire package assessing outcomes and processes in the trial.

RESULTS

OPs identified facilitators and barriers and offered suggestions for study design and recruitment process improvement. Facilitators included the novelty and utility of the study and simplicity of methods; barriers included lack of coordination between treating and discharging clinicians, time constraints, language barriers, motivation, and using a paper-based referral letter. OPs suggested using a combination of electronic and paper referral letters and supporting clinicians to help with recruitment. Patient advisors reported satisfaction with the content and length of the assessment package. However, they questioned the relevance of some questions (childhood trauma) while adding questions about trust in physicians and proximity to primary-care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

OPs and patient advisors rated our methods for the proposed trial highly for their simplicity and relevance then suggested changes. These findings document processes that could be effective for cancer-patient recruitment in survivorship clinical trials.

摘要

背景

随着癌症诊断和治疗的进步,早期乳腺癌(ESBC)患者的生存期延长,需要接受治疗后随访护理的患者人数增加。最佳实践的生存者模式建议将 ESBC 患者从肿瘤学提供者(OP)护理过渡到基于社区的护理。在为未来的随机对照试验(RCT)开发材料以测试护士主导的电话生存者诊所(TSC)是否可以顺利将 ESBC 幸存者过渡到随访护理的可行性时,我们探讨了患者和 OP 对我们提出的几种方法的反应。

方法

我们使用定性研究设计,采用主题分析和双管齐下的方法。我们采访了 OP,寻求有关招募他们的 ESBC 患者参加试验的方法的反馈,还采访了 ESBC 患者,征求他们对评估试验结果和过程的问卷包的意见。

结果

OP 确定了促进因素和障碍,并提出了关于研究设计和招募过程改进的建议。促进因素包括研究的新颖性和实用性以及方法的简单性;障碍包括治疗和出院临床医生之间缺乏协调、时间限制、语言障碍、动机以及使用纸质转诊信。OP 建议使用电子和纸质转诊信的组合,并支持临床医生进行招募。患者顾问对评估包的内容和长度表示满意。然而,他们对一些问题(儿童期创伤)的相关性提出了质疑,同时增加了关于对医生的信任和与初级保健提供者的接近程度的问题。

结论

OP 和患者顾问对拟议试验的方法评价很高,认为它们简单且相关,然后提出了一些修改建议。这些发现记录了在生存者临床试验中招募癌症患者的有效流程。