戈丁-谢泼德休闲时间身体活动问卷在肿瘤学研究中的应用：一项系统综述。
The use of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review.
作者信息
Amireault Steve, Godin Gaston, Lacombe Jason, Sabiston Catherine M
机构信息
Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Warren Stevens Building, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, ON M5S 2W6; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, PY Building, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
出版信息
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Aug 12;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7.
BACKGROUND
The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (GSLTPAQ) is one of the most often used questionnaires in oncology research, yet modifications to the scale are done with little evidence of psychometric testing. This study aimed to (i) document the frequency of use of the questionnaire for ranking (i.e., level of activity) and classification (i.e., active versus insufficiently active) purposes, (ii) summarize how the GSLTPAQ is used in terms of item content and scoring, and (iii) evaluate the extent to which validity evidence supports the use of the scale among cancer survivors.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted with evidence drawn from English-written articles published between January 1(st) 1985 (year the GSLTPAQ was published) and December 31, 2014. A search of six databases, a scan of reference list of included articles, and a cited reference search identified articles that reported using the GSLTPAQ among cancer survivors.
RESULTS
A total of 212 articles were retrieved. The GSLTPAQ was used for classifying cancer survivors into active and insufficiently active categories in 51 % of the articles. Moreover, a modified version of the questionnaire was used in 81 % of the research studies. Three studies reported validity evidence based on the relationship between the scores on the GSLTPAQ (i.e., leisure score index, LSI) and accelerometer or pedometer-derived activity data. Validity evidence supporting the use of the GSLTPAQ for assessing changes in LSI was computed from six randomized trials.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of the GSLTPAQ for classification purpose in oncology research is common. Standardization in the use and interpretation of the GSLTPAQ in oncology research is warranted. Although limited, there is support for using the original form of the GSLTPAQ and interpreting the LSI for ranking cancer survivors from the lowest to highest levels of leisure-time physical activity.
背景
戈丁-谢泼德休闲时间体力活动问卷（GSLTPAQ）是肿瘤学研究中最常用的问卷之一，但对该量表的修改几乎没有心理测量测试的证据。本研究旨在：（i）记录该问卷用于排名（即活动水平）和分类（即活跃与活动不足）目的的使用频率；（ii）总结GSLTPAQ在项目内容和评分方面的使用方式；（iii）评估效度证据支持该量表在癌症幸存者中使用的程度。
方法
进行了一项系统综述，证据来自1985年1月1日（GSLTPAQ发表年份）至2014年12月31日发表的英文文章。对六个数据库进行检索、扫描纳入文章的参考文献列表以及进行引用文献检索，以确定报告在癌症幸存者中使用GSLTPAQ的文章。
结果
共检索到212篇文章。在51%的文章中，GSLTPAQ被用于将癌症幸存者分为活跃和活动不足两类。此外，81%的研究使用了该问卷的修改版。三项研究报告了基于GSLTPAQ得分（即休闲得分指数，LSI）与加速度计或计步器得出的活动数据之间关系的效度证据。从六项随机试验中计算出支持使用GSLTPAQ评估LSI变化的效度证据。
结论
GSLTPAQ在肿瘤学研究中用于分类目的很常见。肿瘤学研究中GSLTPAQ的使用和解释需要标准化。虽然有限，但有证据支持使用GSLTPAQ的原始形式并解释LSI，以便对癌症幸存者从最低到最高水平的休闲时间体力活动进行排名。
Zotero 插件