Suppr超能文献

利用自然驾驶视频数据量化并推荐安全带提醒时机。

Quantifying and recommending seat belt reminder timing using naturalistic driving video data.

作者信息

McGehee Daniel V, Roe Cheryl A, Kasarla Pranaykumar, Wang Chao

机构信息

National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, United States; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, United States.

National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2022 Feb;80:399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To better understand the timing of when people buckle their seat belt, an analysis of a naturalistic driving study was used. The study provided a unique perspective inside of the vehicle where the entire seat belt was visible from the time the driver entered the vehicle to one minute of driving forward or 32 kph.

METHOD

Seat belt buckling behavior was identified for 30 drivers. An additional 10 drives for 13 of these drivers were identified for a seat belt sequencing, which identified the points when the vehicle was put into ignition, shifted, when vehicle movement began, and when the seat belt was buckled. The speed at belt closure was also identified. The timing from ignition to buckle and to shifting into forward gear were examined to identify the speed and appropriate timing for seat belt reminders.

RESULTS

The data show that drivers were buckled in over 92% of the 3,102 drives. In addition, in 70% of those total drives, the drivers were buckled before the vehicle began movement. Of greater interest for seat belt reminders/interlocks are those drives when drivers buckle after movement. When considering time from ignition to seat belt closure, the mean was 27.5 s. Because higher speeds are typically reached when traveling forward rather than reverse, it was important to know the time duration from shifting into drive to buckling. With this consideration, the mean to buckle dropped to 16.2 s. The mean speed at buckling when traveling forward was 15.3 kph. From the regression analysis, the input variables 'Age,' 'Sex,' 'Weight,' 'Environment,' and 'Weather' are significant contributors in predicting the log odds of a driver putting on seatbelt.

CONCLUSIONS

With the understanding that higher speeds lead to an increased risk of injury and/or death and with the results of the analysis, a recommendation of a 30 s time from forward shift and a 25 kph (6.9 m/s) threshold for reminder systems should be implemented. The regression analysis also validates that most of the predicted seat belt buckling times are within 30 s. Practical Applications: This would reduce perception of nuisance alerts and protect the driver from higher speed unbuckled crashes. The seat belt buckling time prediction model also demonstrates good potential for developing tailored buckling warning system for different drivers.

摘要

引言

为了更好地了解人们系安全带的时间,我们对一项自然驾驶研究进行了分析。该研究提供了车内的独特视角,从驾驶员进入车辆到向前行驶一分钟或速度达到32公里/小时这段时间内,整个安全带都是可见的。

方法

确定了30名驾驶员的安全带系扣行为。为其中13名驾驶员额外进行了10次驾驶记录,用于安全带排序,确定车辆点火、换挡、开始移动以及系上安全带的时间点。还确定了系安全带时的速度。研究了从点火到系安全带以及到换入前进挡的时间,以确定安全带提醒的速度和合适时间。

结果

数据显示,在3102次驾驶中,超过92%的驾驶员系上了安全带。此外,在所有驾驶中,70%的驾驶员在车辆开始移动前就系上了安全带。对于安全带提醒/联锁装置来说,更值得关注的是驾驶员在车辆移动后才系安全带的情况。考虑从点火到系上安全带的时间,平均为27.5秒。由于向前行驶时通常比倒车时速度更高,了解从换入前进挡到系安全带的持续时间很重要。考虑到这一点,系安全带的平均时间降至16.2秒。向前行驶时系安全带的平均速度为15.3公里/小时。通过回归分析,输入变量“年龄”“性别”“体重”“环境”和“天气”是预测驾驶员系安全带对数几率的重要因素。

结论

鉴于较高速度会增加受伤和/或死亡风险以及分析结果,建议提醒系统设定从换入前进挡起30秒的时间和25公里/小时(6.9米/秒)的阈值。回归分析还证实,大多数预测的安全带系扣时间在30秒内。实际应用:这将减少对烦人的警报的感知,并保护驾驶员免受高速时未系安全带碰撞的伤害。安全带系扣时间预测模型在为不同驾驶员开发定制的系扣警告系统方面也显示出良好的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验