Suppr超能文献

双氟尼酸与保泰松治疗强直性脊柱炎的比较。

A comparison of diflunisal and phenylbutazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

作者信息

Franssen M J, Gribnau F W, van de Putte L B

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 1986 Jun;5(2):210-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02032359.

Abstract

A 12-week double-blind randomized drug trial followed by an open extension period of 36 weeks was carried out in 38 male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to compare the efficacy and safety of diflunisal (500 mg twice daily) and phenylbutazone (200 mg twice daily). Both drugs proved to be effective in improving the severity of symptoms associated with AS, and this improvement was maintained throughout the open extension period. Initially diflunisal had a more pronounced and rapid analgesic action, whereas phenylbutazone was more effective in increasing axial mobility. During the study 9 patients dropped out: 3 in each treatment group due to side effects and 1 in each group due to lack of efficacy; another patient was lost to follow-up. The two drugs were similarly safe as judged by the occurrence of adverse clinical effects, mainly gastrointestinal. This study again demonstrates the value of phenylbutazone in AS but, taking into account the possible haematological side effects, the use of other NSAIDs is stressed. Diflunisal is an alternative capable of improving the painful stiffness associated with AS.

摘要

对38例男性强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者进行了一项为期12周的双盲随机药物试验,随后是36周的开放延长期,以比较双氯芬酸(每日两次,每次500毫克)和保泰松(每日两次,每次200毫克)的疗效和安全性。两种药物均被证明对改善AS相关症状的严重程度有效,且这种改善在整个开放延长期内得以维持。最初,双氯芬酸具有更显著、快速的镇痛作用,而保泰松在增加轴向活动度方面更有效。在研究期间,有9名患者退出:每个治疗组各有3名因副作用退出,各有1名因疗效不佳退出;另有1名患者失访。根据不良临床事件的发生情况判断,两种药物的安全性相似,主要为胃肠道不良反应。本研究再次证明了保泰松在AS治疗中的价值,但考虑到可能的血液学副作用,强调应使用其他非甾体抗炎药。双氯芬酸是一种能够改善AS相关疼痛性僵硬的替代药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验