Suppr超能文献

在真实临床环境中,检测第一代EGFR-TKIs耐药后晚期NSCLC患者血浆中T790M突变的不同方法的性能。

Performance of different methods for detecting T790M mutation in the plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC after developing resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in a real-world clinical setting.

作者信息

Hou Tongtong, Zeng Jiahao, Xu Hanyan, Su Shanshan, Ye Junru, Li Yuping

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, P.R. China.

出版信息

Mol Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;16(4):88. doi: 10.3892/mco.2022.2521. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

Abstract

Several approaches to the detection of T790M mutations in patient plasma or tissue samples have been implemented to date. The present study was designed to assess the ability of different technologies to detect the T790M mutation in plasma samples and to evaluate the relative rates of re-biopsy and subsequent patient management in a clinical setting. Data from patients with advanced NSCLC who visited the Department of Respiratory Medicine of the First Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University between December 2014 and July 2018 were retrospectively collected. Following re-biopsy, these patients were evaluated for the presence of the T790M mutation via next-generation sequencing (NGS), amplification refractory mutation system or Roche Cobas z480 (Cobas) analyses of tissue samples. T790M mutation status in tumor tissue samples was calculated as a standard reference used to establish the sensitivity, specificity and concordance of three circulating tumor DNA detection approaches, including NGS, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and super amplification refractory mutation system (SuperARMS). Subsequent patient management was also recorded. In total, 287 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were evaluated, of whom 55.4% (159/287) underwent tissue re-biopsy, 76.7% (122/159) underwent sequencing analysis of plasma and/or tissue samples, and 59.0% (72/122) were found to harbor the T790M mutation. The rates of plasma sample T790M detection via NGS, ddPCR and SuperARMS were 60.0, 59.3 and 60.0%, respectively. Only 32 patients with T790M mutations (44.4%, 32/72) were treated with third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), while 19 continued treatment with first-generation TKIs, 13 underwent chemotherapy, 1 switched to treatment with anlotinib, 4 succumbed to pericardial or brain metastases, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Additionally, 2 patients exhibited histological transformation from adenocarcinoma to small cell lung cancer, while 17/97 patients who were evaluated for brain metastases during treatment exhibited intracranial progression. Of these, 8 patients had been treated with osimertinib. In this study of a real-world clinical setting, fewer patients than expected underwent re-biopsy and gene sequencing. Of the tools available for the analysis of plasma samples, NGS exhibited the highest sensitivity and concordance with the results of tissue-based T790M detection strategies. It was additionally found that only a subset of patients harboring the T790M mutation were ultimately treated using third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

摘要

迄今为止,已经实施了几种检测患者血浆或组织样本中T790M突变的方法。本研究旨在评估不同技术检测血浆样本中T790M突变的能力,并在临床环境中评估再次活检的相对比例以及随后的患者管理情况。回顾性收集了2014年12月至2018年7月期间就诊于温州医科大学附属第一医院呼吸内科的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的数据。再次活检后,通过下一代测序(NGS)、扩增阻滞突变系统或对组织样本进行罗氏Cobas z480(Cobas)分析,评估这些患者是否存在T790M突变。计算肿瘤组织样本中的T790M突变状态,作为用于确定三种循环肿瘤DNA检测方法(包括NGS、液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)和超级扩增阻滞突变系统(SuperARMS))的敏感性、特异性和一致性的标准参考。还记录了随后的患者管理情况。总共评估了287例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,其中55.4%(159/287)接受了组织再次活检,76.7%(122/159)接受了血浆和/或组织样本的测序分析,59.0%(72/122)被发现携带T790M突变。通过NGS、ddPCR和SuperARMS检测血浆样本中T790M的比例分别为60.0%、59.3%和60.0%。只有32例携带T790M突变的患者(44.4%,32/72)接受了第三代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)治疗,19例继续接受第一代TKIs治疗,13例接受化疗,1例改用安罗替尼治疗,4例死于心包或脑转移,3例失访。此外,2例患者出现了从腺癌到小细胞肺癌的组织学转变,而在治疗期间接受脑转移评估的17/97例患者出现了颅内进展。其中,8例患者接受了奥希替尼治疗。在这项真实世界临床环境的研究中,接受再次活检和基因测序的患者比预期的少。在可用于分析血浆样本的工具中,NGS表现出最高的敏感性,并且与基于组织的T790M检测策略的结果一致性最高。还发现,只有一部分携带T790M突变的患者最终接受了第三代EGFR-TKIs治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in retreatment of patients without T790M.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 31;14(7):2483-2493. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-36. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Development and validation of an ultrasensitive qPCR method to identify and quantify EGFR T790M in cell-free DNA.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Jan;17(1):49-62. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2451527. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-World EGFR T790M Testing in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study in Japan.
Oncol Ther. 2018 Dec;6(2):203-215. doi: 10.1007/s40487-018-0064-8. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Ultra-sensitive Detection as an Independent Prognostic Marker for Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Mutations and Treated with First-generation TKIs.
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4280-4289. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2683. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Transformation to small cell lung cancer after first-line afatinib treatment.
Respir Med Case Rep. 2018 Mar 1;23:188-190. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.02.011. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparison of the SuperARMS and Droplet Digital PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in ctDNA From NSCLC Patients.
Transl Oncol. 2018 Apr;11(2):542-545. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验