Centre for Circulating Tumor Cell Diagnostics & Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Oct;10(10):1879-1884. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13154. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
Gene mutation analysis from plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can provide timely information regarding the mechanism of resistance that could translate to personalised treatment. We compared concordance rate of next generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in the detection of the EGFR activating and T790M mutation from plasma ctDNA with diagnostic tissue biopsy-based assays. The second objective was to test whether putative osimertinib resistance associated mutations were detectable from plasma using NGS.
From January 2016 to December 2017, we prospectively collected plasma samples from patients prior to commencement of second- or third-line osimertinib therapy and upon disease progression, in a single tertiary hospital in South Western Sydney, Australia. Amplicon-based NGS and ddPCR assays were used to detect activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and T790M mutations in 18 plasma samples from nine patients; all patients were required to have tissue biopsies with known EGFR status.
High concordance of allelic fractions were seen in matched plasma NGS and ddPCR for activating EGFR mutations and T790M mutations (R = 0.92, P < 0.0001). Using tissue biopsies as reference standard, sensitivity was 100% for NGS and 94% for ddPCR. Several possible osimertinib resistance associated mutations, including PIK3CA, BRAF and TP53 mutations, were detected by NGS in samples upon progression on osimertinib therapy.
ddPCR assays for EGFR mutations appear to be as sensitive and highly concordant as amplicon-based NGS. NGS has the ability to detect novel resistance mutations.
从血浆循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)中的基因突变分析可以提供有关耐药机制的及时信息,从而转化为个体化治疗。我们比较了下一代测序(NGS)和液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)在检测血浆 ctDNA 中 EGFR 激活和 T790M 突变方面与基于诊断组织活检的检测方法的一致性。第二个目标是测试 NGS 是否可以从血浆中检测到推定的奥希替尼耐药相关突变。
从 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月,我们在澳大利亚西南悉尼的一家单一三级医院前瞻性地收集了在开始第二或三线奥希替尼治疗前和疾病进展时的血浆样本。使用基于扩增子的 NGS 和 ddPCR 检测了来自 9 名患者的 18 个血浆样本中的激活表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和 T790M 突变;所有患者均需进行具有已知 EGFR 状态的组织活检。
在匹配的血浆 NGS 和 ddPCR 中,激活 EGFR 突变和 T790M 突变的等位基因分数高度一致(R = 0.92,P < 0.0001)。使用组织活检作为参考标准,NGS 的灵敏度为 100%,ddPCR 的灵敏度为 94%。在奥希替尼治疗进展时的样本中,NGS 检测到了几种可能的奥希替尼耐药相关突变,包括 PIK3CA、BRAF 和 TP53 突变。
ddPCR 检测 EGFR 突变的方法似乎与基于扩增子的 NGS 一样敏感且高度一致。NGS 具有检测新的耐药突变的能力。