• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字时代的隐私和健康实践。

Privacy and Health Practices in the Digital Age.

机构信息

University of Brasilia.

Federal University of Pernambuco.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jul;22(7):50-59. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2040648. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2022.2040648
PMID:35254963
Abstract

Increasing privacy concerns are arising from expanding use of aggregated personal information in health practices. Conversely, in light of the promising benefits of data driven healthcare, privacy is being frequently dismissed as outdated, costly and ultimately egotistical. This paper aims to review the theoretical framework on privacy in order to overcome the often simplistic debate between the primacy of individual or collective interests. As a result, it is argued that although privacy can be understood as freedom of personal choice in matters of sharing intimacy, it is foundational to both community belonging and to social and political organizations at large. Ethical decisions on the use of data analytics technologies in health practices should also take into account the social effects of violating privacy.

摘要

日益增长的隐私担忧源于个人信息在医疗实践中的广泛应用。相反,鉴于数据驱动医疗保健的广阔前景,隐私被频繁地视为过时、昂贵且自私的观念而遭到摒弃。本文旨在综述隐私理论框架,以克服个人利益或集体利益至上的简单化观点之争。因此,本文认为,隐私可以被理解为在分享亲密关系方面的个人选择自由,但它也是社区归属感以及整个社会和政治组织的基础。在医疗实践中使用数据分析技术的伦理决策也应该考虑侵犯隐私的社会影响。

相似文献

1
Privacy and Health Practices in the Digital Age.数字时代的隐私和健康实践。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jul;22(7):50-59. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2040648. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.智能家居,私人住宅?一项关于技术研究人员对开发智能家居健康技术中伦理问题认知的实证研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z.
3
Balancing Between Privacy and Patient Needs for Health Information in the Age of Participatory Health and Social Media: A Scoping Review.参与式健康与社交媒体时代隐私与患者健康信息需求之间的平衡:一项范围综述
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):29-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641197. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
4
What Do We Mean by Sharing of Patient Data? DaSH: A Data Sharing Hierarchy of Privacy and Ethical Challenges.我们所说的患者数据共享是什么意思?DaSH:数据共享的隐私和伦理挑战层次结构。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):833-841. doi: 10.1055/a-2373-3291. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
In the shadow of privacy: Overlooked ethical concerns in COVID-19 digital epidemiology.在隐私的阴影下:被忽视的 COVID-19 数字流行病学中的伦理问题。
Epidemics. 2022 Dec;41:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100652. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
6
Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions.将焦点重新放回患者身上:隐私担忧如何影响个人健康信息共享意愿。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 13;19(9):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6877.
7
Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the "privacy paradox"?保护数字欧洲中的人类健康与安全:如何应对“隐私悖论”?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Sep;20(3):639-58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9511-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
Biobanks, Data Sharing, and the Drive for a Global Privacy Governance Framework.生物样本库、数据共享与全球隐私治理框架的推动
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):675-89. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12311.
9
An ethical assessment model for digital disease detection technologies.数字疾病检测技术的伦理评估模型。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2017 Sep 20;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0062-x.
10
Personal privacy in the health care system: employer-sponsored insurance, managed care, and integrated delivery systems.医疗保健系统中的个人隐私:雇主赞助保险、管理式医疗和综合服务体系。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997 Dec;7(4):361-76. doi: 10.1353/ken.1997.0033.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining what patients admitted with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation will use for remote clinical monitoring: a patient engagement survey.确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期入院患者将用于远程临床监测的设备:一项患者参与度调查。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e002841. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002841.
2
The risk of neurotechnology as an instrument of colonialism.神经技术作为殖民主义工具的风险。
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 30;7(3):fcaf139. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf139. eCollection 2025.
3
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.
非经验方法在医学、医疗保健和公共卫生领域数字技术伦理研究中的应用:系统期刊评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
4
Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing.澳大利亚在基因组数据共享背景下对同意豁免的态度。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2024 Jul;19(3):113-123. doi: 10.1177/15562646241261848.
5
Asking questions that matter - Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials.提出重要问题——作为改善神经技术临床试验知情同意程序工具的问题提示清单。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 29;16:983226. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226. eCollection 2022.
6
Data, Privacy, and Agency: Beyond Transparency to Empowerment.数据、隐私与能动性:超越透明度以实现赋权
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jul;22(7):63-65. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075975.