School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Nov 2;43(6):1322-1328. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac030.
Burn care clinicians are required to make critical decisions regarding the withholding and withdrawal of treatment in patients with severe and potentially non-survivable burn injuries. Little is known about how Australian and New Zealand burn care specialists approach decision-making for these patients. This study aimed to understand clinician beliefs, values, considerations, and difficulties regarding palliative and end-of-life (EoL) care discussions and decision-making following severe burn injury in Australian and New Zealand burn services. An online survey collected respondent and institutional demographic data as well as information about training and involvement in palliative care/EoL decision-making discussions from nurses, surgeons, and intensivists in Australian and New Zealand hospitals with specialist burn services. Twenty-nine burns nurses, 26 burns surgeons, and 15 intensivists completed the survey. Respondents were predominantly female (64%) and had a median of 15 years of experience in treating burn patients. All respondents received little training in EoL decision-making during their undergraduate education; intensivists reported receiving more on-the-job training. Specialist clinicians differed on who they felt should contribute to EoL discussions. Ninety percent of respondents reported injury severity as a key factor in their decision-making to withhold or withdraw treatment, but less than half reported considering age in their decision-making. Approximately two-thirds indicated a high probability of death or a poor predicted quality of life influenced their decision-making. The three cohorts of clinicians had similar views toward certain aspects of EoL decision-making. Qualitative research could provide detailed insights into the varying perspectives held by clinicians.
烧伤护理临床医生需要在患有严重且可能无法存活的烧伤患者中做出关于治疗的保留和撤销的关键决策。对于澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤护理专家如何为这些患者做出决策,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在了解澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤服务机构中烧伤护士、外科医生和重症监护医生在严重烧伤后进行姑息治疗/临终关怀(EoL)讨论和决策时的信念、价值观、考虑因素和困难。一项在线调查收集了受访者和机构的人口统计学数据,以及有关培训和参与姑息治疗/EoL 决策讨论的信息,这些信息来自澳大利亚和新西兰设有专科烧伤服务的医院的护士、外科医生和重症监护医生。29 名烧伤护士、26 名烧伤外科医生和 15 名重症监护医生完成了调查。受访者主要是女性(64%),在治疗烧伤患者方面平均有 15 年的经验。所有受访者在本科教育期间接受的临终关怀决策培训很少;重症监护医生报告说接受了更多的在职培训。专科临床医生在谁应该参与 EoL 讨论方面存在分歧。90%的受访者表示,伤害严重程度是他们决定保留或撤销治疗的关键因素,但只有不到一半的受访者表示在决策时考虑了年龄因素。大约三分之二的人表示,高死亡率或预计生活质量差会影响他们的决策。这三个临床医生群体对 EoL 决策的某些方面有相似的看法。定性研究可以深入了解临床医生持有的不同观点。