• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤专家对严重烧伤患者生命末期决策的看法:一项在线调查研究结果。

Burn Care Specialists' Views Toward End-of-Life Decision-Making in Patients With Severe Burn Injury: Findings From an Online Survey in Australia and New Zealand.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2022 Nov 2;43(6):1322-1328. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac030.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irac030
PMID:35255498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9629441/
Abstract

Burn care clinicians are required to make critical decisions regarding the withholding and withdrawal of treatment in patients with severe and potentially non-survivable burn injuries. Little is known about how Australian and New Zealand burn care specialists approach decision-making for these patients. This study aimed to understand clinician beliefs, values, considerations, and difficulties regarding palliative and end-of-life (EoL) care discussions and decision-making following severe burn injury in Australian and New Zealand burn services. An online survey collected respondent and institutional demographic data as well as information about training and involvement in palliative care/EoL decision-making discussions from nurses, surgeons, and intensivists in Australian and New Zealand hospitals with specialist burn services. Twenty-nine burns nurses, 26 burns surgeons, and 15 intensivists completed the survey. Respondents were predominantly female (64%) and had a median of 15 years of experience in treating burn patients. All respondents received little training in EoL decision-making during their undergraduate education; intensivists reported receiving more on-the-job training. Specialist clinicians differed on who they felt should contribute to EoL discussions. Ninety percent of respondents reported injury severity as a key factor in their decision-making to withhold or withdraw treatment, but less than half reported considering age in their decision-making. Approximately two-thirds indicated a high probability of death or a poor predicted quality of life influenced their decision-making. The three cohorts of clinicians had similar views toward certain aspects of EoL decision-making. Qualitative research could provide detailed insights into the varying perspectives held by clinicians.

摘要

烧伤护理临床医生需要在患有严重且可能无法存活的烧伤患者中做出关于治疗的保留和撤销的关键决策。对于澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤护理专家如何为这些患者做出决策,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在了解澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤服务机构中烧伤护士、外科医生和重症监护医生在严重烧伤后进行姑息治疗/临终关怀(EoL)讨论和决策时的信念、价值观、考虑因素和困难。一项在线调查收集了受访者和机构的人口统计学数据,以及有关培训和参与姑息治疗/EoL 决策讨论的信息,这些信息来自澳大利亚和新西兰设有专科烧伤服务的医院的护士、外科医生和重症监护医生。29 名烧伤护士、26 名烧伤外科医生和 15 名重症监护医生完成了调查。受访者主要是女性(64%),在治疗烧伤患者方面平均有 15 年的经验。所有受访者在本科教育期间接受的临终关怀决策培训很少;重症监护医生报告说接受了更多的在职培训。专科临床医生在谁应该参与 EoL 讨论方面存在分歧。90%的受访者表示,伤害严重程度是他们决定保留或撤销治疗的关键因素,但只有不到一半的受访者表示在决策时考虑了年龄因素。大约三分之二的人表示,高死亡率或预计生活质量差会影响他们的决策。这三个临床医生群体对 EoL 决策的某些方面有相似的看法。定性研究可以深入了解临床医生持有的不同观点。

相似文献

1
Burn Care Specialists' Views Toward End-of-Life Decision-Making in Patients With Severe Burn Injury: Findings From an Online Survey in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤专家对严重烧伤患者生命末期决策的看法:一项在线调查研究结果。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 Nov 2;43(6):1322-1328. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac030.
2
Exploring clinicians' decision-making processes about end-of-life care after burns: A qualitative interview study.探讨烧伤患者临终关怀决策:定性访谈研究。
Burns. 2023 May;49(3):595-606. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Clinical differences between major burns patients deemed survivable and non-survivable on admission.入院时被判定可存活与不可存活的重度烧伤患者的临床差异。
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):870-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
4
Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study.澳大利亚和新西兰可能无法存活的烧伤患者的治疗决策:基于登记的研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2023 May 2;44(3):675-684. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac017.
5
End-of-life decisions in Burn Intensive Care Units - An International Survey.烧伤重症监护病房中的临终决策——一项国际调查
Burns. 2015 Feb;41(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
6
South African critical care nurses' views on end-of-life decision-making and practices.南非重症监护护士对临终决策和实践的看法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2014 Jan;19(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12026. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
7
EfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care.欧洲危重症护理协会调查:欧洲重症监护护士对临终关怀的态度和信念。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):110-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00328.x.
8
Plastic surgical trainees' perspectives toward burn surgery in Australia and New Zealand: Changes in the last 17 years?澳大利亚和新西兰整形外科研习医师对烧伤外科的看法:17 年来的变化?
Burns. 2021 Dec;47(8):1766-1772. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
9
Improved and standardized method for assessing years lived with disability after burns and its application to estimate the non-fatal burden of disease of burn injuries in Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands.烧伤后残疾年限评估的改进和标准化方法及其在评估澳大利亚、新西兰和荷兰烧伤疾病非致命负担中的应用。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8233-8.
10
Epidemiology of burn injury in older adults: An Australian and New Zealand perspective.老年人烧伤流行病学:澳大利亚和新西兰视角
Scars Burn Heal. 2020 Sep 29;6:2059513120952336. doi: 10.1177/2059513120952336. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
The Complex Dynamics of Decision-Making at the End of Life in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review of Stakeholders' Views and Influential Factors.重症监护病房临终决策的复杂动态:利益相关者观点及影响因素的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 25;16(1):e52912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52912. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
What are the triggers for palliative care referral in burn intensive care units? Results from a qualitative study based on healthcare professionals' views, clinical experiences and practices.在烧伤重症监护病房中,哪些是启动姑息治疗转介的触发因素?一项基于医护人员观点、临床经验和实践的定性研究的结果。
Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;38(3):297-309. doi: 10.1177/02692163241229962. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
PC-FACS May 2, 2022.2022年5月2日 血小板荧光激活细胞分选术
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jul;64(1):80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Association between gender and outcomes of acute burns patients.性别与急性烧伤患者预后之间的关联。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec 1. doi: 10.1111/ans.16426.
3
The Role of Palliative Care in Burns: A Scoping Review.姑息治疗在烧伤中的作用:范围综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 May;59(5):1089-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
4
Do patients, families, and healthcare teams benefit from the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units? Results from a systematic review with narrative synthesis.患者、家属和医疗团队是否从烧伤重症监护病房的姑息治疗整合中受益?系统评价与叙述性综合的结果。
Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;33(10):1241-1254. doi: 10.1177/0269216319862160. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Predictors of withdrawal of life support after burn injury.烧伤后生命支持撤离的预测因素。
Burns. 2019 Mar;45(2):322-327. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
Burns in the Third World: an unmet need.第三世界的烧伤问题:一项未得到满足的需求。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2017 Dec 31;30(4):243-246.
8
Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients.烧伤外科医生和姑息治疗医生对老年烧伤患者护理目标界定的态度。
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Oct 23;39(6):1000-1005. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iry027.
9
Relationship between multidisciplinary critical care and burn patients survival: A propensity-matched national cohort analysis.
Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
End-of-life decisions in Burn Intensive Care Units - An International Survey.烧伤重症监护病房中的临终决策——一项国际调查
Burns. 2015 Feb;41(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jul 11.