Suppr超能文献

中国短期暴露于环境一氧化碳与非意外、心血管及呼吸死亡率之间关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies between short-term exposure to ambient carbon monoxide and non-accidental, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality in China.

作者信息

Guo Xianwei, Song Qiuxia, Wang Hao, Li Ning, Su Wanying, Liang Mingming, Sun Chenyu, Ding Xiuxiu, Liang Qiwei, Sun Yehuan

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Internal Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, 2900 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60657, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):35707-35722. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19464-9. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Abstract

Although a growing number of original epidemiological studies imply a link between ambient pollution exposure and mortality risk, the findings associated with carbon monoxide (CO) exposure are inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to evaluate the correlations between ambient CO and non-accidental, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality in China. Eight databases were searched from inception to 15 May 2021. A random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses as well as sensitivity analyses were performed. The I square value (I) was used to assess heterogeneity among different studies. The assessment of publication bias on included studies was examined by funnel plot and Egger's test. The influence of a potential publication bias on findings was explored by using the trim-and-fill procedure. Ultimately, a total of 19 studies were included in our analysis. The pooled relative risk for each 1 mg/m increase of ambient carbon monoxide was 1.0220 (95%CI: 1.0102-1.0339) for non-accidental mortality, 1.0304 (95%CI:1.0154-1.0457) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.0318 (95%CI:1.0132-1.0506) for respiratory mortality. None of subgroup analyses could explain the source of heterogeneity. Exclusion of any single study did not materially alter the pooled effect estimates. Although it was suggestive of publication bias, findings were generally similar with principal findings when we explored the influence of a potential publication bias using the trim-and-fill method. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that exposure to ambient CO was positive with risk of deaths from all non-accidental causes, total cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases. Based on these findings, tougher intervention policies and initiatives to reduce the health effects of CO exposure should be established.

摘要

尽管越来越多的原始流行病学研究表明环境污染物暴露与死亡风险之间存在联系,但与一氧化碳(CO)暴露相关的研究结果并不一致。因此,我们对流行病学研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估中国环境CO与非意外、心血管和呼吸系统死亡率之间的相关性。检索了从数据库建立到2021年5月15日的八个数据库。采用随机效应模型计算合并相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。I²值用于评估不同研究之间的异质性。通过漏斗图和Egger检验对纳入研究的发表偏倚进行评估。使用修剪填充法探讨潜在发表偏倚对研究结果的影响。最终,共有19项研究纳入我们的分析。环境一氧化碳每升高1mg/m³,非意外死亡率的合并相对风险为1.0220(95%CI:1.0102 - 1.0339),心血管死亡率为1.0304(95%CI:1.0154 - 1.0457),呼吸系统死亡率为1.0318(95%CI:1.0132 - 1.0506)。亚组分析均无法解释异质性来源。排除任何一项研究均未实质性改变合并效应估计值。尽管提示存在发表偏倚,但当我们使用修剪填充法探讨潜在发表偏倚的影响时,研究结果与主要发现总体相似。我们的荟萃分析表明,环境CO暴露与所有非意外原因、总心血管疾病和呼吸系统疾病导致的死亡风险呈正相关。基于这些发现,应制定更严格的干预政策和措施,以减少CO暴露对健康的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验