Suppr超能文献

主动踝关节运动对腿部压迫和小腿肌肉收缩对坐姿个体静脉血液动力学的影响。

Effects of leg compression and calf muscle contraction by active ankle motion on venous hemodynamics in sitting individuals.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.

出版信息

Phlebology. 2022 Jun;37(5):361-366. doi: 10.1177/02683555221077741. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the effects of compression and active ankle motion on venous hemodynamics in healthy sitting individuals.

METHODS

In the sitting position, 14 participants performed plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle for 3 s each without compression. Changes in the calf volume were recorded using air plethysmography. Subsequently, the process was repeated with the application of tubular elastic bandage (TEB), followed by anti-thrombotic stocking (ATS).

RESULTS

The median interface pressure at the calf was 16 mmHg with TEB and 21 mmHg with ATS. Without compression (), the median venous volume was 76 mL. This was reduced to 58 mL with TEB and 56 mL with ATS ( < .01 vs. N for both). On the other hand, ejection volume by plantar flexion in (27 mL) was not significantly changed with TEB (31 mL) or ATS (31 mL). Also, ejection volume by dorsiflexion in (53 mL, < .001 vs. plantar flexion) was not significantly changed with TEB (53 mL, < .01 vs. plantar flexion) or ATS (41 mL, < .05 vs. plantar flexion).

CONCLUSIONS

The venous volume, which is defined as the change in enclosed calf volume from elevation to dependency, in the sitting position reduced similarly with TEB and ATS; however, the ejection volumes did not change significantly. Dorsiflexion exerted a larger ejection volume than plantar flexion in the sitting position.

摘要

目的

阐明在健康坐姿个体中,压迫和主动踝关节运动对静脉血液动力学的影响。

方法

在坐姿下,14 名参与者进行踝关节背屈和跖屈,每次持续 3 秒,不施加压迫。使用空气体积描记法记录小腿体积的变化。随后,在应用管状弹性绷带(TEB)和抗血栓袜(ATS)后重复该过程。

结果

TEB 时小腿的中位界面压力为 16mmHg,ATS 时为 21mmHg。不施加压迫()时,中位静脉容量为 76mL。TEB 时减少至 58mL,ATS 时减少至 56mL(均 <.01 与 N 相比)。另一方面,跖屈时的射血量(27mL)在 TEB(31mL)或 ATS(31mL)时没有明显变化。此外,背屈时的射血量(53mL, <.001 与跖屈相比)在 TEB(53mL, <.01 与跖屈相比)或 ATS(41mL, <.05 与跖屈相比)时也没有明显变化。

结论

在坐姿下,用 TEB 和 ATS 同样能使静脉容量(定义为从抬高到依赖时小腿容积的变化)减少,但射血量没有明显变化。在坐姿下,背屈比跖屈产生更大的射血量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验