• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性心脏起搏器植入的预后影响。

Prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Université de Rennes 1, CHU Rennes Service de Cardiologie, Inserm LTSI U1099, Rennes, France.

Université de Rennes 1, CHU Rennes Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Inserm LTSI U1099, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.002
PMID:35257975
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remain a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of PPI after TAVR according to the timing of implantation relative to TAVR.

METHODS

A total of 1199 patients (median age 83 years; interquartile range 78-86 years; 549 [45.8%] female) were included in the analysis, of whom 894 (70.8%) had not undergone PPI, 130 (10.8%) had undergone previous PPI, 116 (9.7%) had undergone in-hospital PPI, and 59 (4.9%) had undergone PPI during follow-up. Median follow-up was 2.94 years (1.42-4.32 years). The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher occurrence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.20) whereas previous PPI and in-hospital PPI were not (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.71-1.29 and HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.88-1.81, respectively). PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure (sub-HR 3.21; 95% CI 2.02-5.11), while this relationship was only borderline significant for previous PPI (sub-HR 1.51; 95% CI 0.99-2.29). In contrast, there was no relationship between in-hospital PPI and the subsequent risk of hospitalization for heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Previous PPI and in-hospital PPI had no long-term prognostic impact on the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure, whereas PPI during follow-up was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure. The present study questions the deleterious influence of periprocedural post-TAVR PPI, which has previously been suggested by certain studies.

摘要

背景

需要永久性心脏起搏器植入(PPI)的传导障碍仍然是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的常见并发症。

目的

本研究旨在根据 TAVR 后 PPI 植入的时间,确定 TAVR 后 PPI 对预后的影响。

方法

共纳入 1199 例患者(中位年龄 83 岁;四分位距 78-86 岁;549[45.8%]例女性),其中 894 例(70.8%)未行 PPI,130 例(10.8%)行过 PPI,116 例(9.7%)行院内 PPI,59 例(4.9%)在随访期间行 PPI。中位随访时间为 2.94 年(1.42-4.32 年)。主要终点是全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院的复合终点。

结果

随访期间行 PPI 与主要终点发生率较高相关(风险比[HR]2.11;95%置信区间[CI]1.39-3.20),而既往 PPI 和院内 PPI 则无相关性(HR0.96;95%CI0.71-1.29 和 HR1.26;95%CI0.88-1.81)。随访期间行 PPI 与心力衰竭住院风险增加相关(亚 HR3.21;95%CI2.02-5.11),而既往 PPI 与心力衰竭住院风险增加仅呈边缘显著相关(亚 HR1.51;95%CI0.99-2.29)。相反,院内 PPI 与心力衰竭住院的后续风险之间没有关系。

结论

既往 PPI 和院内 PPI 对全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院的风险无长期预后影响,而随访期间行 PPI 与心力衰竭住院风险增加相关。本研究对某些研究先前提出的围手术期 post-TAVR PPI 的有害影响提出质疑。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性心脏起搏器植入的预后影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入新的永久性起搏器患者的长期结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):301-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.032.
3
Prognostic impact of new permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新植入永久性起搏器的预后影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct;102(4):743-750. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30788. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的临床影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2771-2781. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924.
5
Clinical effects of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the nationwide FRANCE-TAVI registry.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后植入永久性起搏器的临床效果:来自全国 FRANCE-TAVI 登记研究的结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Mar;117(3):213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.12.011. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Pacemaker Implantation After Balloon- or Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经皮球囊或自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的起搏器植入。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015896. Epub 2020 May 2.
7
Clinical Impact of Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者基线右束支传导阻滞的临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1564-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From the U.S. Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入的发生率、预测因素和结局:来自美国胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会 TVT 注册中心的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2189-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.026.
9
Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Periprocedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞和经皮心脏永久起搏器植入对患者临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003635.
10
Long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者行永久性心脏起搏器植入的长期临床影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1127-1136. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac008.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Periprocedural and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of TAVI in Patients with Ejection Fraction ≤ 20% vs. Patients with 20% < EF ≤ 40.射血分数≤20%的患者与20%<射血分数≤40%的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术围手术期及中期结果的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 20;12(6):2390. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062390.
2
Unmet Needs in TAVR: Conduction Disturbances and Management of Coronary Artery Disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中未满足的需求:传导障碍与冠状动脉疾病的管理
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 24;11(21):6256. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216256.