Özkan Enes, Acar Ahmet Hüseyin
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Oct 1;33(7):2100-2103. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008609. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of the information YouTube TM offers to patients concerning dental implant failure. YouTube TM was searched systematically using the keyword 'dental implant failure'. The first 100 videos were viewed by two independent researchers. For each video, its purpose, target audience and source were also recorded. A 10 point content scale (CS) was used to evaluate the video content. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was also used to determine the quality of videos. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney test and correlation coefficient analyses were performed using Spearman's Rho. While 92.2% of the videos included in the study were uploaded by dentists/health institutions, only 3.1% were uploaded by laypersons. Of the videos, 40.6% were aimed at informing laypersons and 56.3% targetted professionals. The content which was discussed most (71.9%) was 'definition of a dental implant' followed by 'reasons for failure' (65.6%). The mean CS and GQS score of the videos were 3.75 ± 2.35 (moderate) and 2.07 ± 1.05 (generally poor), respectively. There was a positive correlation between the CS and GQS score (r = 0.620). The quality of information on YouTube TM regarding dental implant failure was found inadequate. Thus, the information currently available online needs to be constantly checked and improved by professionals. In addition, clinicians should improve the ways in which they use YouTube TM to better inform patients about the causes, risks and treatment choices involved with failed dental implants.
本研究的目的是调查YouTube TM向患者提供的有关牙种植体失败的信息质量。使用关键词“牙种植体失败”对YouTube TM进行系统搜索。两名独立研究人员观看了前100个视频。对于每个视频,还记录了其目的、目标受众和来源。使用10分内容量表(CS)评估视频内容。还使用全球质量量表(GQS)来确定视频质量。使用Kruskal Wallis和Mann Whitney检验进行统计分析,使用Spearman's Rho进行相关系数分析。在纳入研究的视频中,92.2%由牙医/医疗机构上传,只有3.1%由非专业人员上传。在这些视频中,40.6%旨在向非专业人员提供信息,56.3%针对专业人员。讨论最多的内容(71.9%)是“牙种植体的定义”,其次是“失败原因”(65.6%)。视频的平均CS和GQS得分分别为3.75±2.35(中等)和2.07±1.05(总体较差)。CS和GQS得分之间存在正相关(r = 0.620)。发现YouTube TM上关于牙种植体失败的信息质量不足。因此,目前在线提供的信息需要专业人员不断检查和改进。此外,临床医生应改进他们使用YouTube TM的方式,以便更好地向患者告知牙种植体失败所涉及的原因、风险和治疗选择。