Department of Prosthodontics, Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Jun;25(3):605-612. doi: 10.1111/cid.13194. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos of zygomatic implants.
According to Google Trends (2021), "zygomatic implant" was the most preferred keyword related to the topic. Therefore, in this study "zygomatic implant" was used as a keyword for the video search. Demographic characteristics such as the number of views, likes/dislikes, comments, video duration, number of days after upload, uploaders, and target audiences of the videos were evaluated. To evaluate the accuracy and content quality of videos (available from YouTube), the video information and quality index (VIQI) and global quality scale (GQS) were used. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact chi-square test, Yates continuity correction, and Spearman correlation analysis (p < 0.05).
A total of 151 videos were searched; 90 met all inclusion criteria. According to the video content score, 78.9% of the videos were identified as low content, 20% as moderate, and 1.1% as high content. There was no statistical difference between the groups in video demographic characteristics (p > 0.001). Conversely, information flow, accuracy of information, video quality and precision, and total VIQI scores were statistically different between the groups. The moderate-content group had a higher GQS score than the low-content group (p < 0.001). The videos were mainly uploaded (40%) from hospitals and universities. Most videos were targeted toward professionals (46.75%). Low-content videos had higher ratings than the moderate- and high-content videos.
Most YouTube videos on zygomatic implants showed low-content quality. This implies that YouTube is not a reliable source of information on zygomatic implants. Dentists, prosthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of the content of video-sharing platforms and take responsibility for enriching video content.
本研究旨在评估颧骨种植体的 YouTube 视频内容和质量。
根据 Google Trends（2021 年），“颧骨种植体”是与该主题最相关的首选关键字。因此，在本研究中，“颧骨种植体”被用作视频搜索的关键字。评估视频的人口统计学特征，如浏览量、点赞/不喜欢、评论、视频时长、上传后天数、上传者和目标受众。为了评估视频（可从 YouTube 获得）的准确性和内容质量，使用了视频信息和质量指数（VIQI）和全球质量量表（GQS）。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、卡方检验、Fisher 确切卡方检验、Yates 连续性校正和 Spearman 相关分析进行统计分析（p<0.05）。
共搜索到 151 个视频，其中 90 个符合所有纳入标准。根据视频内容评分，78.9%的视频被确定为低内容，20%为中内容，1.1%为高内容。在视频人口统计学特征方面，各组之间无统计学差异（p>0.001）。相反，信息流程、信息准确性、视频质量和精度以及总 VIQI 评分在组间存在统计学差异。中内容组的 GQS 评分高于低内容组（p<0.001）。视频主要（40%）由医院和大学上传。大多数视频针对专业人士（46.75%）。低内容视频的评分高于中内容和高内容视频。
大多数关于颧骨种植体的 YouTube 视频显示出低内容质量。这意味着 YouTube 不是颧骨种植体信息的可靠来源。牙医、修复学家和口腔颌面外科医生应该了解视频共享平台的内容，并负责丰富视频内容。
