Haliloğlu Özkan Tuğba, Dursun Derya
Department of Oral and Dental Health Program, Üsküdar University, Vocational School of Health Services, İstanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Orthod. 2022 Sep;35(3):192-197. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21132.
The study aimed to investigate the quality of the information available to patients on YouTube™ concerning orthodontic elastics.
A systematic search was carried out on YouTube™ using the keyword "elastics." The first 120 videos were viewed by 2 independent reviewers, and after the inclusion criteria were applied, 39 videos were excluded from the study. Demographic data of the videos were collected for the remaining 81 videos. For each video, its purpose, target audience, and source were also recorded. A 10-point content scale was used to evaluate the video content. The Global Quality Scale was also used to determine the quality of the videos. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, and correlation coefficient analyses were performed using Spearman's rho.
In total, 36% of the included videos were uploaded by dentists and 22% by laypersons. In 77% of the videos, the purpose was to inform laypersons, and in 4%, the purpose was to inform professionals only. The content discussed the most (85.2%) was the instruction of orthodontic elastics use. The mean 10-point Content Scale score and Global Quality Scale score of the videos were 2.25 ± 1.99 (poor) and 2.60 ± 0.73 (moderate), respectively. There was a positive correlation between 10-point Content Scale and Global Quality Scale score (r = 0.258).
The information available on YouTube™ regarding orthodontic elastics is quite poor and can be misleading for patients. Therefore, health professionals with evidence-based knowledge and clinical experience should improve the way they use YouTube™ to inform patients about the correct use of orthodontic elastics and to improve compliance with wearing orthodontic elastics.
本研究旨在调查患者在YouTube™上可获取的有关正畸弹力线的信息质量。
在YouTube™上使用关键词“弹力线”进行系统搜索。由2名独立评审员查看前120个视频,应用纳入标准后,39个视频被排除在研究之外。收集其余81个视频的人口统计学数据。对于每个视频,还记录了其目的、目标受众和来源。使用10分制内容量表评估视频内容。还使用全球质量量表来确定视频的质量。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析,使用Spearman秩相关系数进行相关性系数分析。
总共,纳入视频中36%由牙医上传,22%由外行人上传。在77%的视频中,目的是向外行人提供信息,4%的目的是仅向专业人员提供信息。讨论最多的内容(85.2%)是正畸弹力线的使用指导。视频的平均10分制内容量表得分和全球质量量表得分分别为2.25±1.99(差)和2.60±0.73(中等)。10分制内容量表得分与全球质量量表得分之间存在正相关(r = 0.258)。
YouTube™上有关正畸弹力线的信息质量相当差,可能会误导患者。因此,具备循证知识和临床经验的健康专业人员应改进他们使用YouTube™的方式,以便告知患者正畸弹力线的正确使用方法,并提高患者佩戴正畸弹力线的依从性。