• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究参与和经历的患者植入左心室辅助设备之前和之后的机械循环支持措施的调整和生活质量(MCS A-QOL)研究。

Research engagement and experiences of patients pre- and post-implant of a left ventricular assist device from the mechanical circulatory support measures of adjustment and quality of life (MCS A-QOL) study.

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Departments of Medical Social Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2457-2470. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03111-4. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-022-03111-4
PMID:35258804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10284295/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Adults living with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) present with unique challenges (e.g., left ventricular assist device [LVAD]-related self-care, adverse events) to research study enrollment, engagement, and completion. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of adults with MCS who were eligible for and enrolled in a study of health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

In a secondary analysis of data from the Mechanical Circulatory Support: Measures of Adjustment and Quality of Life study, we used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate research engagement and experiences among adults preparing to undergo or currently living with MCS implant. First, we assessed the cascade of study engagement. Second, we assessed research experiences using a structured interview developed for this study.

RESULTS

Of 1011 participants approached for the study, 86.7% enrolled, 12.7% declined, and 0.6% were ineligible. Of 877 participants enrolled, 272 were pre-implant (of whom 88% completed assessments; "respondents") and 605 were post-implant (of whom 74% completed assessments). Only 14% of respondents reported difficulty completing the questionnaires, 54% had previously used an iPad to complete questionnaires, and 62% reported that their experience was "as expected." Respondents qualitatively described both positive (e.g., value of research) and negative (e.g., too much time) research experiences, difficulties completing questionnaires (e.g., online platform, health literacy issues), and provided recommendations for the questionnaires and delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants enjoyed participating in HRQOL research focused on MCS and had unique perspectives for improving the questionnaires. It is important to minimize the burden of participation and critical to be flexible to meet participant preferences for research engagement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03044535 (accessible at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03044535 ), registered February 7, 2017.

摘要

目的

患有机械循环支持(MCS)的成年人在研究入组、参与和完成方面存在独特的挑战(例如,左心室辅助装置[LVAD]相关的自我护理、不良事件)。本研究的目的是了解符合条件并参加健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)研究的 MCS 成年人的经验。

方法

在机械循环支持:调整和生活质量研究数据的二次分析中,我们使用混合方法评估了准备接受或正在接受 MCS 植入的成年人的研究参与和经验。首先,我们评估了研究参与的级联。其次,我们使用为本研究开发的结构化访谈评估了研究经验。

结果

在该研究中,1011 名参与者中有 86.7%入组,12.7%拒绝,0.6%不符合条件。在 877 名入组的参与者中,272 名处于植入前(其中 88%完成评估;“应答者”),605 名处于植入后(其中 74%完成评估)。只有 14%的应答者报告说完成问卷有困难,54%以前使用过 iPad 完成问卷,62%表示他们的体验“符合预期”。应答者定性描述了积极的(例如,研究的价值)和消极的(例如,时间太多)研究体验、完成问卷的困难(例如,在线平台、健康素养问题),并为问卷和交付提出了建议。

结论

参与者喜欢参与专注于 MCS 的 HRQOL 研究,并对改善问卷有独特的看法。尽量减少参与负担很重要,灵活满足参与者对研究参与的偏好至关重要。

试验注册

NCT03044535(可在 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03044535 上获得),于 2017 年 2 月 7 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b710/10284295/f3bef7fe7966/nihms-1908990-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b710/10284295/f3bef7fe7966/nihms-1908990-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b710/10284295/f3bef7fe7966/nihms-1908990-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Research engagement and experiences of patients pre- and post-implant of a left ventricular assist device from the mechanical circulatory support measures of adjustment and quality of life (MCS A-QOL) study.研究参与和经历的患者植入左心室辅助设备之前和之后的机械循环支持措施的调整和生活质量(MCS A-QOL)研究。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2457-2470. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03111-4. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
PROMIS: Physical, Mental and Social Health Outcomes Improve From Before to Early After LVAD Implant: Findings From the Mechanical Circulatory Support: Measures of Adjustment and Quality of Life (MCS A-QOL) Study.PROMIS:从 LVAD 植入前到早期,身体、心理和社会健康状况均得到改善:来自机械循环支持:调整和生活质量(MCS A-QOL)研究的结果。
J Card Fail. 2023 Oct;29(10):1398-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Efficient measurement of multiple ventricular assist device patient-reported outcomes: Creation of a 20-item profile from the MCS A-QOL study.多心室辅助装置患者报告结局的有效测量:根据MCS A-QOL研究创建一个包含20个条目的概况。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Aug;43(8):1308-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.04.060. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Quality of life and emotional distress early after left ventricular assist device implant: a mixed-method study.左心室辅助装置植入术后早期的生活质量和情绪困扰:一项混合方法研究。
Artif Organs. 2015 Mar;39(3):220-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12362. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
Overall quality of life improves to similar levels after mechanical circulatory support regardless of severity of heart failure before implantation.无论植入前心力衰竭的严重程度如何,机械循环支持后整体生活质量都能提高到相似水平。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Apr;33(4):412-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
An exploratory study of sleep quality, daytime function, and quality of life in patients with mechanical circulatory support.机械循环支持患者睡眠质量、日间功能及生活质量的探索性研究
Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Jul;35(7):531-7. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000109.
7
Assessment of pre-operative psychosocial function among people receiving left ventricular assist devices: A national survey of US LVAD programs.评估接受左心室辅助装置治疗人群的术前心理社会功能:一项对美国 LVAD 项目的全国性调查。
Heart Lung. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(4):302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.老年晚期心力衰竭患者的健康相关生活质量:SUSTAIN-IT 研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e024385. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024385. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
9
Preparedness and Mutuality Affect Quality of Life for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Their Caregivers.准备情况和互助关系影响机械循环支持患者及其照顾者的生活质量。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004414. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004414.
10
Health-related quality of life in mechanical circulatory support: Development of a new conceptual model and items for self-administration.机械循环支持中的与健康相关的生活质量:新的概念模型和自我管理项目的开发。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Oct;34(10):1292-304. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing health-related quality of life of patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.影响左心室辅助装置患者健康相关生活质量的因素:一项系统评价与主题综合分析
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Nov 28;20(8):803-815. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab056.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 2020 年度报告》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
3
Assessment of Mortality Among Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients Ineligible for Clinical Trials.
评估不符合临床试验条件的耐用性左心室辅助装置接受者的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032865. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32865.
4
Evaluating Recruitment Strategies for a Randomized Clinical Trial with Heart Failure Patients.评估针对心力衰竭患者的随机临床试验的招募策略。
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Aug;43(8):785-790. doi: 10.1177/0193945920970229. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
5
Qualitative Methodology in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Contemporary Look.心血管结局研究中的定性方法:当代视角
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005828. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005828. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Engaging patients throughout the health system: A landscape analysis of cold-call policies and recommendations for future policy change.在整个卫生系统中让患者参与进来:关于电话随访政策的全景分析及对未来政策变革的建议。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Dec;2(6):384-392. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.1.
7
Women in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials-What Are the Barriers to Address to Improve Enrollment?心血管临床试验中的女性——提高入组率需要克服哪些障碍?
Can J Cardiol. 2019 May;35(5):552-554. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断变化的适应证、结果和科学合作》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011.
9
Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned.利用电子健康记录和患者门户进行实用临床试验的招募:成功经验和教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jan 1;26(1):44-49. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy138.
10
Quality of life with an LVAD: A misunderstood concept.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)下的生活质量:一个被误解的概念。
Heart Lung. 2018 May-Jun;47(3):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 15.