Suppr超能文献

与临床前期患者相比,通过数字成像系统评估的系统性硬化症患者的前臂卟啉水平升高。

Forearm porphyrin levels evaluated by digital imaging system are increased in patients with systemic sclerosis compared with patients in pre-clinical stage.

作者信息

Tabata Kayoko, Kaminaka Chikako, Yasutake Misaki, Matsumiya Ryo, Inaba Yutaka, Yamamoto Yuki, Jinnin Masatoshi, Fujii Takao

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

出版信息

Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2022 Feb;11(1):1-6. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2021.01157.

Abstract

We hypothesized that changes in skin characteristics on the forearm could be useful for early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). We used VISIA digital imaging system to investigate this possibility for the first time. Twenty-eight Japanese patients who were diagnosed with typical or very early diagnosis of SSc (VEDOSS) were enrolled in this study, and ten age- and gender-matched patients with other disorders were included as a control group. Eight skin characteristics were analyzed. Our method of evaluating forearm skin characteristics was shown to be reproducible. The scores of WRINKLES, TEXTURE, PORES, and PORPHYRINS were higher in SSc subjects with sclerotic forearm skin (SSc forearm+; 11.004, 5.116, 3.230, and 0.084, respectively) and those without (SSc forearm-: 11.915, 4.898, 2.624, 0.0616, respectively) than in the non-SSc control subjects (10.075, 4.496, 2.459, 0.0223, respectively). Also, the scores of SPOTS, TEXTURE, PORES, UV SPOTS, BROWN SPOTS, and PORPHYRINS were elevated in SSc forearm+ (3.182, 5.116, 3.230, 5.761, 6.704, 0.084, respectively) and SSc forearm- patients (2.391, 4.898, 2.624, 9.835, 5.798, 0.0616, respectively) compared with those with VEDOSS (2.362, 4.738, 2.234, 5.999, 4.898, 0.0169, respectively). We found statistical significance in the difference in score of PORPHYRINS between SSc forearm- and VEDOSS groups ( = 0.044), and between SSc forearm+ and VEDOSS groups ( = 0.012). Therefore, they can be used to differentiate VEDOSS from early or mild SSc cases, which is sometimes clinically problematic. Our study also suggests that the porphyrin research will lead to a better understanding of SSc pathogenesis.

摘要

我们假设前臂皮肤特征的变化可能有助于系统性硬化症(SSc)的早期诊断。我们首次使用VISIA数字成像系统来研究这种可能性。本研究纳入了28例被诊断为典型或极早期系统性硬化症(VEDOSS)的日本患者,并纳入了10例年龄和性别匹配的患有其他疾病的患者作为对照组。分析了8种皮肤特征。我们评估前臂皮肤特征的方法具有可重复性。在患有硬化性前臂皮肤的SSc患者(SSc前臂+;皱纹、纹理、毛孔和卟啉的评分分别为11.004、5.116、3.230和0.084)和未患硬化性前臂皮肤的SSc患者(SSc前臂-:分别为11.915、4.898、2.624、0.0616)中,这些指标的评分高于非SSc对照组(分别为10.075、4.496、2.459、0.0223)。此外,与VEDOSS患者(斑点、纹理、毛孔、紫外线斑点、褐色斑点和卟啉的评分分别为2.362、4.738、2.234、5.999、4.898、0.0169)相比,SSc前臂+患者(分别为3.182、5.116、3.230、5.761、6.704、0.084)和SSc前臂-患者(分别为2.391、4.898、2.624、9.835、5.798、0.0616)的这些指标评分升高。我们发现SSc前臂-组与VEDOSS组之间卟啉评分的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.044),SSc前臂+组与VEDOSS组之间也具有统计学意义(P = 0.012)。因此,它们可用于区分VEDOSS与早期或轻度SSc病例,这在临床上有时存在问题。我们的研究还表明,卟啉研究将有助于更好地理解SSc的发病机制。

相似文献

2
Evidence for a Derangement of the Microvascular System in Patients with a Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis.
J Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;44(8):1190-1197. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160791. Epub 2017 May 15.
8
What have we learned on pre, very early, and early systemic sclerosis microcirculatory pathophysiology? A scoping review.
Autoimmun Rev. 2024 May;23(5):103540. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103540. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
9
New Autoantibody Specificities in Systemic Sclerosis and Very Early Systemic Sclerosis.
Antibodies (Basel). 2021 Mar 28;10(2):12. doi: 10.3390/antib10020012.
10
Evidence for oesophageal and anorectal involvement in very early systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS): report from a single VEDOSS/EUSTAR centre.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):124-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203889. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

3
Novel Use of Non-Invasive Devices and Microbiopsies to Assess Facial Skin Rejuvenation Following Laser Treatment.
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Nov;52(9):822-830. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23233. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
4
Do scleroderma patients look young?: Evaluation by using facial imaging system.
Drug Discov Ther. 2017;11(6):342-345. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2017.01059.
5
Comparison of two skin imaging analysis instruments: The VISIA from Canfield vs the ANTERA 3D CS from Miravex.
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Feb;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12381. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
6
Facial skin photo-aging and development of hyperpigmented spots from children to middle-aged Japanese woman.
Skin Res Technol. 2017 Nov;23(4):613-618. doi: 10.1111/srt.12380. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Facial Pores: Definition, Causes, and Treatment Options.
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):277-85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000657.
8
VISIA system: a possible tool in the cosmetic practice.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Nov;13(11):1312-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验