• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室中研究人类行为的实用指南。

A practical guide for studying human behavior in the lab.

作者信息

Barbosa Joao, Stein Heike, Zorowitz Sam, Niv Yael, Summerfield Christopher, Soto-Faraco Salvador, Hyafil Alexandre

机构信息

Brain Circuits & Behavior lab, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.

Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):58-76. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01793-9. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-022-01793-9
PMID:35262897
Abstract

In the last few decades, the field of neuroscience has witnessed major technological advances that have allowed researchers to measure and control neural activity with great detail. Yet, behavioral experiments in humans remain an essential approach to investigate the mysteries of the mind. Their relatively modest technological and economic requisites make behavioral research an attractive and accessible experimental avenue for neuroscientists with very diverse backgrounds. However, like any experimental enterprise, it has its own inherent challenges that may pose practical hurdles, especially to less experienced behavioral researchers. Here, we aim at providing a practical guide for a steady walk through the workflow of a typical behavioral experiment with human subjects. This primer concerns the design of an experimental protocol, research ethics, and subject care, as well as best practices for data collection, analysis, and sharing. The goal is to provide clear instructions for both beginners and experienced researchers from diverse backgrounds in planning behavioral experiments.

摘要

在过去几十年里,神经科学领域取得了重大技术进步,使研究人员能够极其详细地测量和控制神经活动。然而,人类行为实验仍然是探究心智奥秘的重要方法。其相对适度的技术和经济要求,使行为研究成为背景各异的神经科学家颇具吸引力且易于开展的实验途径。然而,与任何实验工作一样,它有自身固有的挑战,可能带来实际障碍,尤其是对经验较少的行为研究人员而言。在此,我们旨在提供一份实用指南,以便稳步推进涉及人类受试者的典型行为实验工作流程。本入门指南涉及实验方案设计、研究伦理和受试者护理,以及数据收集、分析和共享的最佳实践。目标是为不同背景的初学者和经验丰富的研究人员在规划行为实验时提供清晰的指导。

相似文献

1
A practical guide for studying human behavior in the lab.实验室中研究人类行为的实用指南。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):58-76. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01793-9. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.生物医学数据共享与再利用:临床与科研人员的态度及实践
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.
3
Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework.公民社会实验室:一个在公民科学框架内进行人类行为实验的数字平台。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0207219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207219. eCollection 2018.
4
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
5
DataPipe: Born-open data collection for online experiments.DataPipe:在线实验用开放式数据收集。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2499-2506. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02161-x. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
The Ethics of Health Professions Education Research: Protecting the Integrity of Science, Research Subjects, and Authorship.卫生专业教育研究的伦理:维护科学、研究对象及署名的完整性。
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):13-17. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004413.
7
Open Lab: A web application for running and sharing online experiments.开放实验室:一个用于运行和共享在线实验的网络应用程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):3118-3125. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01776-2. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Science ethics: a study of eminent scientists' professional values.科学伦理:对杰出科学家职业价值观的研究。
Scientometrics. 1998 Oct;43(2):269-98. doi: 10.1007/BF02458411.
9
Addressing Global Data Sharing Challenges.应对全球数据共享挑战。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):317-23. doi: 10.1177/1556264615591561.
10
What does 'respect for persons' require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research.“尊重人”需要什么?遗传研究人员在告知研究参与者研究情况方面的态度和报告做法。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):48-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041350. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Reliability of Cognitive Task Measures: A Narrative Review.提高认知任务测量的可靠性:综述。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Aug;8(8):789-797. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science.计算建模如何推动心理科学中的理论构建。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):789-802. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970585. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Quantifying behavior to understand the brain.量化行为以理解大脑。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Dec;23(12):1537-1549. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00734-z. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Dissociable Effects of Monetary, Liquid, and Social Incentives on Motivation and Cognitive Control.金钱、物质和社会激励对动机与认知控制的可分离效应
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02212. eCollection 2020.
4
Reduced serial dependence suggests deficits in synaptic potentiation in anti-NMDAR encephalitis and schizophrenia.序列相关性降低表明抗 NMDAR 脑炎和精神分裂症中突触强化的缺陷。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 25;11(1):4250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18033-3.
5
Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience.保持真实:重新思考认知神经科学中实验控制的首要地位。
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117254. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Power contours: Optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience.功率轮廓:优化实验心理学和人类神经科学中的样本量和精度。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Jun;26(3):295-314. doi: 10.1037/met0000337. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Humans primarily use model-based inference in the two-stage task.人类主要在两阶段任务中使用基于模型的推理。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):1053-1066. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0905-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.运用贝叶斯因子假设检验在神经科学中建立无证据的结论。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs.贝叶斯与频率派群组序贯临床试验设计的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 7;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0892-8.
10
Is Preregistration Worthwhile?预注册是否值得?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):94-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Dec 28.