• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder controls and conflicts in research funding and publication.利益相关者在研究资金和出版方面的控制和冲突。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0264865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264865. eCollection 2022.
2
Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives.生物医学科学资助评审现状调查:资助机构和评审人的观点。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-62.
3
Researcher, research thyself? Mapping the landscape of canine health and welfare research funding provided by UK not-for-profit organisations from 2012-2022.研究者,研究自身?描绘英国非营利组织 2012-2022 年提供的犬类健康和福利研究资金状况。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303498. eCollection 2024.
4
Attitudes and practices of public health academics towards research funding from for-profit organizations: cross-sectional survey.公共卫生学者对营利性组织研究经费的态度和实践:横断面调查。
Int J Public Health. 2020 Sep;65(7):1133-1145. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01416-0. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
A 25-year analysis of the American College of Gastroenterology research grant program: factors associated with publication and advancement in academics.对美国胃肠病学会研究资助项目的25年分析:与学术发表及职业发展相关的因素
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1097-105. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.35. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
6
Corporate Funding for Schools of Public Health: Confronting the Ethical and Economic Challenges.企业对公共卫生学院的资助:应对伦理和经济挑战
Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):615-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303079. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Open access publishing in the biomedical sciences: could funding agencies accelerate the inevitable changes?生物医学领域的开放获取出版:资助机构能否加速这一不可避免的变革?
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Sep;23(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00657.x.
8
Seed grants as a means of stimulating cancer research funding.种子基金作为刺激癌症研究资金的一种手段。
Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 12.
9
[Medicine: conflicts of interest in research].[医学:研究中的利益冲突]
Rev Invest Clin. 2003 May-Jun;55(3):339-46.
10
United Kingdom health research analyses and the benefits of shared data.英国健康研究分析与共享数据的益处。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0116-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Published Research on COVID-19 in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Bibliometric Analysis.东地中海区域关于COVID-19的已发表研究:文献计量分析
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Jul 19;11(2):e38935. doi: 10.2196/38935.

本文引用的文献

1
"He who pays the piper calls the tune": Researcher experiences of funder suppression of health behaviour intervention trial findings.“谁出钱谁做主”:研究人员对资金方压制健康行为干预试验结果的体验。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0255704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255704. eCollection 2021.
2
Universities will never be the same after the coronavirus crisis.新冠病毒危机之后,大学将面貌一新。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7811):162-164. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01518-y.
3
In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough.在追求开放科学的过程中,开放获取是不够的。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):574-577. doi: 10.1126/science.aba3763.
4
Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health.通过游客心理健康评估保护区的经济价值。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 12;10(1):5005. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12631-6.
5
Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation.政府资助的研究日益推动创新。
Science. 2019 Jun 21;364(6446):1139-1141. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2373. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
The world debates open-access mandates.全球围绕开放获取授权展开辩论。
Science. 2019 Jan 4;363(6422):11-12. doi: 10.1126/science.363.6422.11.
7
Corporate culture: protect idea factories.企业文化:保护创意工厂。
Nature. 2017 Mar 22;543(7646):491. doi: 10.1038/543491a.

利益相关者在研究资金和出版方面的控制和冲突。

Stakeholder controls and conflicts in research funding and publication.

机构信息

School of Environment & Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0264865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264865. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264865
PMID:35263379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906579/
Abstract

Academics are required by their university employers both to raise research funding and to publish research findings, but conditions imposed by research funders may conflict with the requirements of research publishers. These conflicts create risks, with potentially severe consequences, that differ between research fields and funders, and must be navigated by individual academics. I propose that universities report cases of conflict, including causes and resolutions, to national registries accessible to all research organisations. These could serve both as a warning to grant applicants, and a deterrent to future interference by funders.

摘要

学术界人士既要为其大学雇主筹集研究资金,又要发表研究成果,但研究资金提供者施加的条件可能与研究出版者的要求相冲突。这些冲突在不同的研究领域和资金提供者之间存在风险,可能会产生严重的后果,需要由个人学者来应对。我建议大学向所有研究机构都可访问的国家登记处报告冲突案例,包括冲突的原因和解决方案。这既可以警告拨款申请人,也可以阻止资金提供者未来的干预。