• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化患者行食管癌切除术的风险分层:单中心经验。

Risk stratification of cirrhotic patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A single-centre experience.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0265093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265093. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265093
PMID:35263385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concomitant liver cirrhosis is a crucial risk factor for major surgeries. However, only few data are available concerning cirrhotic patients requiring esophagectomy for malignant disease.

METHODS

From a prospectively maintained database of esophageal cancer patients, who underwent curative esophagectomy between 01/2012 and 01/2016, patients with concomitant liver cirrhosis (liver-cirrhotic patients, LCP) were compared to non-liver-cirrhotic patients (NLCP).

RESULTS

Of 170 patients, 14 cirrhotic patients with predominately low MELD scores (≤ 9, 64.3%) were identified. Perioperative outcome was significantly worse for LCP, as proofed by 30-day (57.1% vs. 7.7, p<0.001) and 90-day mortality (64.3% vs. 9.6%, p<0.001), anastomotic leakage rate (64.3 vs. 22.3%, p = 0.002) and sepsis (57.1 vs. 21.5%, p = 0.006). Even after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidities, and surgical approach, LCP revealed higher odds for 30-day and 90-day mortality compared to NLCP. Moreover, 5-year survival analysis showed a significantly poorer long-term outcome of LCP (p = 0.023). For risk stratification, none of the common cirrhosis scores proved prognostic impact, whereas components as Bilirubin (auROC 94.4%), INR (auROC = 90.0%), and preoperative ascites (p = 0.038) correlated significantly with the perioperative outcome.

CONCLUSION

Curative esophagectomy for cirrhotic patients is associated with a dismal prognosis and should be evaluated critically. While MELD and Child score failed to predict perioperative mortality, Bilirubin and INR proofed excellent prognostic capacity in this cohort.

摘要

背景

合并肝硬化是重大手术的关键危险因素。然而,对于需要接受恶性疾病食管切除术的肝硬化患者,仅有少数数据。

方法

从 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 1 月期间接受根治性食管切除术的食管癌患者的前瞻性数据库中,比较了合并肝硬化的患者(肝硬化患者,LCP)与非肝硬化患者(NLCP)。

结果

在 170 名患者中,确定了 14 名主要具有低 MELD 评分(≤9,64.3%)的肝硬化患者。LCP 的围手术期结果明显较差,30 天(57.1%比 7.7%,p<0.001)和 90 天死亡率(64.3%比 9.6%,p<0.001)、吻合口漏率(64.3%比 22.3%,p=0.002)和脓毒症(57.1%比 21.5%,p=0.006)证实了这一点。即使调整了年龄、性别、合并症和手术方式,LCP 发生 30 天和 90 天死亡率的几率仍高于 NLCP。此外,5 年生存分析显示 LCP 的长期结果明显较差(p=0.023)。对于风险分层,没有任何常见的肝硬化评分证明具有预后影响,而胆红素(auROC 94.4%)、INR(auROC=90.0%)和术前腹水(p=0.038)等成分与围手术期结果显著相关。

结论

肝硬化患者接受根治性食管切除术与预后不良相关,应进行批判性评估。虽然 MELD 和 Child 评分未能预测围手术期死亡率,但胆红素和 INR 在该队列中证明具有出色的预后能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c3/8906633/65f91b776aba/pone.0265093.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c3/8906633/f09399c3525c/pone.0265093.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c3/8906633/65f91b776aba/pone.0265093.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c3/8906633/f09399c3525c/pone.0265093.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3c3/8906633/65f91b776aba/pone.0265093.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk stratification of cirrhotic patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A single-centre experience.肝硬化患者行食管癌切除术的风险分层:单中心经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 9;17(3):e0265093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265093. eCollection 2022.
2
Esophageal Cancer Surgery for Patients with Concomitant Liver Cirrhosis: A Single-Center Matched-Cohort Study.伴有肝硬化患者的食管癌手术:一项单中心匹配队列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;24(3):763-769. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5610-8. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Can we perform esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients with concomitant liver cirrhosis? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.合并肝硬化的食管癌患者能否行食管癌切除术?一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jun 1;32(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz003.
4
The impact of cirrhosis on esophageal cancer surgery: An up-to-date meta-analysis.肝硬化对食管癌手术的影响:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):865-872. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.肝硬化患者的食管切除术:一项系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
J Visc Surg. 2018 Dec;155(6):453-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
6
Esophageal cancer with cirrhosis of the liver: results of esophagectomy in 18 consecutive patients.伴有肝硬化的食管癌:18例连续食管切除术患者的结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Dec;7(10):758-63. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0758-6.
7
The model for the end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh score in predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal variceal bleeding.终末期肝病模型及Child-Pugh评分在预测肝硬化合并食管静脉曲张出血患者预后中的应用
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2009 Sep;66(9):724-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp0909724b.
8
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.评分系统对疑似感染肝硬化患者预后预测价值的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421.
9
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score: an independent prognostic factor of mortality in injured cirrhotic patients.终末期肝病模型评分:肝硬化损伤患者死亡的独立预后因素。
Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1074-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.109. Epub 2011 May 16.
10
Can oesophagectomy be performed for patients with oesophageal carcinoma and concomitant liver cirrhosis? A retrospective study based on a propensity-matched cohort.食管癌合并肝硬化患者能否行食管切除术?一项基于倾向匹配队列的回顾性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;25(3):442-447. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx132.

引用本文的文献

1
Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.肝硬化患者的食管切除术:短期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02060-6. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Enhancing Preoperative Outcome Prediction: A Comparative Retrospective Case-Control Study on Machine Learning versus the International Esodata Study Group Risk Model for Predicting 90-Day Mortality in Oncologic Esophagectomy.增强术前结局预测:一项关于机器学习与国际食管疾病数据研究组风险模型预测肿瘤性食管切除术90天死亡率的比较回顾性病例对照研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;16(17):3000. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173000.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Treatment pattern and overall survival in esophageal cancer during a 13-year period: A nationwide cohort study of 6,354 Korean patients.13 年间食管癌的治疗模式和总生存情况:6354 例韩国患者的全国性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0231456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231456. eCollection 2020.
3
The impact of cirrhosis on esophageal cancer surgery: An up-to-date meta-analysis.
肝硬化对食管癌手术的影响:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):865-872. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Can we perform esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients with concomitant liver cirrhosis? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.合并肝硬化的食管癌患者能否行食管癌切除术?一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jun 1;32(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz003.
6
Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌手术后的长期生存比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1005-1017. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003252.
7
Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Choice and Outcome of Two Different Treatment Options for Patients with Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.年龄和合并症对潜在可治愈食管癌患者两种不同治疗选择的选择和结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(4):986-995. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Prognosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma following surgery and no surgery in a nationwide Swedish cohort study.瑞典一项全国性队列研究中,手术与非手术治疗后食管腺癌和鳞状细胞癌的预后情况。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 10;8(5):e021495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021495.
9
Preoperative elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for cirrhotic patients undergoing abdominal surgery.肝硬化患者腹部手术前的择期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):330-337. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0249. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.肝硬化患者的食管切除术:一项系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
J Visc Surg. 2018 Dec;155(6):453-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 10.