• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄和合并症对潜在可治愈食管癌患者两种不同治疗选择的选择和结果的影响。

Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Choice and Outcome of Two Different Treatment Options for Patients with Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(4):986-995. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6
PMID:30719634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6399439/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery.

METHODS

In this population-based study, all patients with potentially curable EC (cT1N+/cT2-3, TX, any cN, cM0) diagnosed in the South East of the Netherlands between 2004 and 2014 were included. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 702 patients was included. Age ≥ 75 years and multiple comorbidities were associated with a higher probability for dCRT (odds ratio [OR] 8.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.72-15.58; and OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.93-4.93). The strongest associations were found for the combination of hypertension plus diabetes (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.97-7.32) and the combination of cardiovascular with pulmonary comorbidity (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1.57-6.46). Patients with EC who underwent dCRT had a poorer prognosis than those who underwent nCRT plus surgery, irrespective of age, number, and type of comorbidities. In contrast, for patients with squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, OS was comparable between both groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52; 95% CI 0.78-2.97; and HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.13-4.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological tumor type should be acknowledged in treatment choices for patients with esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery should basically be advised as treatment of choice for operable esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, dCRT may be the preferred strategy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估年龄和合并症对根治性放化疗(dCRT)或新辅助放化疗加手术选择和结局的影响。

方法

在这项基于人群的研究中,纳入了 2004 年至 2014 年间在荷兰东南部被诊断为可治愈的 EC(cT1N+/cT2-3、TX、任何 cN、cM0)的所有患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验以及多变量 Cox 回归分析来比较总生存率(OS)。

结果

共纳入 702 例患者。年龄≥75 岁和多种合并症与 dCRT 的可能性更高相关(优势比 [OR] 8.58;95%置信区间 [CI] 4.72-15.58;和 OR 3.09;95% CI 1.93-4.93)。最强的关联见于高血压加糖尿病(OR 3.80;95% CI 1.97-7.32)和心血管加肺部合并症(OR 3.18;95% CI 1.57-6.46)的组合。接受 dCRT 的 EC 患者的预后不如接受 nCRT 加手术的患者,无论年龄、合并症数量和类型如何。相比之下,对于患有≥2 种合并症或年龄≥75 岁的鳞状细胞癌患者,两组之间的 OS 相当(风险比 [HR] 1.52;95% CI 0.78-2.97;和 HR 0.73;95% CI 0.13-4.14)。

结论

在治疗食管癌患者时,应考虑组织学肿瘤类型。新辅助放化疗加手术应基本作为可手术食管腺癌患者的首选治疗方法。对于患有≥2 种合并症或年龄≥75 岁的食管鳞状细胞癌患者,dCRT 可能是首选策略。

相似文献

1
Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Choice and Outcome of Two Different Treatment Options for Patients with Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.年龄和合并症对潜在可治愈食管癌患者两种不同治疗选择的选择和结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(4):986-995. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07181-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Definitive chemoradiation or surgery in elderly patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study on patterns of care and survival.荷兰老年潜在可治愈性食管癌患者的确定性放化疗或手术:基于人群的全国性研究,涉及治疗模式和生存情况。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Sep;57(9):1192-1200. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1450521. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Advanced Age is Not a Contraindication for Treatment With Curative Intent in Esophageal Cancer.高龄并非食管癌根治性治疗的禁忌证。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep;41(9):919-926. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000390.
4
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:结局和失败模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Feb;194(2):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
5
Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer.扩大CROSS新辅助放化疗原入选标准对食管癌毒性和生存的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Long-Term Outcome of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Induction Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for T4 Esophageal Cancer with Tracheobronchial Invasion.根治性放化疗和诱导放化疗联合手术治疗伴有气管支气管侵犯的 T4 期食管癌的长期疗效。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(11):3280-3287. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6656-6. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Comparison of transthoracic esophagectomy with definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who could tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy.对于能够耐受经胸段食管癌切除术的食管鳞状细胞癌患者,比较经胸段食管癌切除术与根治性放化疗作为初始治疗方法的效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1866-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4337-7. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
8
Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管癌的淋巴结清扫。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):3038-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
9
Post-treatment mortality after definitive chemoradiotherapy versus resection for esophageal cancer.根治性放化疗后与切除术治疗食管癌的治疗后死亡率。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz073.
10
Salvage Esophagectomy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Who Really Benefits from this High-Risk Surgery?食管鳞状细胞癌患者根治性放化疗后挽救性食管切除术:谁真正能从这种高风险手术中获益?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4438-44. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4556-6. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis to Evaluate Local Treatment Modalities for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Over 80 years on A SEER Database.一项倾向评分匹配分析,以评估美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中80岁以上食管鳞状细胞癌的局部治疗方式
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Aug 9;20:1223-1234. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S511737. eCollection 2025.
2
Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年局部晚期食管癌患者的治疗策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12853-y.
3
Complications and comorbidities associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: Rethinking drug design and delivery for anticancer therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Definitive chemoradiotherapy.根治性放化疗
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S792-S798. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.05.
2
Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.食管癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v50-v57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw329.
3
The SCOPE of definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: what direction for the future?局部晚期食管癌确定性放化疗的范围:未来何去何从?
与抗肿瘤化疗相关的并发症和合并症:重新思考抗癌治疗的药物设计与递送。
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024 Jul;14(7):2901-2926. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Survival Impacts of Impaired Lung Functions and Comorbidities on Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients.肺功能障碍和合并症对老年食管癌患者生存的影响。
World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3229-3239. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07195-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
5
Clinical Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the Efficacy of Salvage Photodynamic Therapy Using Talaporfin Sodium for Esophageal Cancer.基于替拉帕芬钠的挽救性光动力疗法治疗食管癌的临床疗效:Charlson 合并症指数的影响
Intern Med. 2024 Apr 1;63(7):903-910. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1907-23. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
6
Influence of age as a continuous variable on survival outcomes and treatment options in patients with upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.年龄作为连续变量对上段食管癌患者生存结局及治疗选择的影响。
J Cancer. 2023 Apr 9;14(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.7150/jca.83490. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical characteristics and changing trajectories of esophageal cancer and gastric cancer in China from 2010 to 2019: An analysis of a hospital-based database of 24,327 patients.2010年至2019年中国食管癌和胃癌的临床特征及变化轨迹:基于24327例患者的医院数据库分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 13;13:1126841. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1126841. eCollection 2023.
8
External validation of a risk model for survival prediction in older patients with cancer undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.用于接受择期腹部手术的老年癌症患者生存预测的风险模型的外部验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):5085-5094. eCollection 2022.
9
Endoscopic debulking resection with additive chemoradiotherapy: Optimal management of advanced inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜下减瘤切除术联合放化疗:晚期不可切除食管鳞状细胞癌的优化治疗
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Sep 15;14(9):1758-1770. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1758.
10
Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer-who benefits?局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗:谁获益?
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Dec;198(12):1062-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01929-y. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1014-8. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.74.
4
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Salvage Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Esophageal Cancer: Is It a Viable Therapeutic Option?放化疗后挽救性手术治疗食管癌:是否可行的治疗选择?
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3866-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9092. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
Doubling of 30-Day Mortality by 90 Days After Esophagectomy: A Critical Measure of Outcomes for Quality Improvement.食管癌切除术后90天内30天死亡率翻倍:质量改进结果的关键衡量指标
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):286-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215.
7
Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.考虑合并症在多学科癌症团队会议中的治疗决策中的作用:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1325-32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv025. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
8
Understanding mortality as a quality indicator after esophagectomy.将死亡率理解为食管癌切除术后的一项质量指标。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):506-11; discussion 511-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.041. Epub 2014 May 17.
9
A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients.卡铂和紫杉醇与顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶在食管癌患者根治性放化疗中的比较。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):638-643. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt589. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
10
Residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiation outside the radiation therapy target volume: a new prognostic factor for survival in esophageal cancer.新辅助放化疗后放疗靶区外的残留肿瘤:食管癌生存的新预后因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):845-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Jan 8.