• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者中基于团队的连续性护理与心血管疾病风险之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究

Association Between Team-Based Continuity of Care and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases Among Patients With Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Chan Kam Suen, Wan Eric Yuk Fai, Chin Weng Yee, Yu Esther Yee Tak, Mak Ivy Lynn, Cheng Will Ho Gi, Ho Margaret Kay, Lam Cindy Lo Kuen

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 May 1;45(5):1162-1169. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1217.

DOI:10.2337/dc21-1217
PMID:35263428
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are a long-term sequela of diabetes. Better individual-based continuity of care has been reported to reduce the risk of chronic complications among patients with diabetes. Maintaining a one-to-one patient-physician relationship is often challenging, especially in public health care settings. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between higher team-based continuity of care, defined as consultations provided by the same physician team, and CVD risks in patients with diabetes from public primary care clinics.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in Hong Kong of 312,068 patients with type 2 diabetes and without any history of CVD at baseline (defined as the earliest attendance at a doctor's consultation in a public-sector clinic between 2008 and 2018). Team-based continuity of care was measured using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), calculated by the proportion of consultations provided by the most visited physician team in the 2 years before baseline. Patients were divided into quartiles based on their UPCI, and the characteristics of the quartiles were balanced using propensity score fine stratification weights. Multivariable Cox regression was applied to assess the effect of team-based continuity of care on CVD incidence. Patient demographics, smoking status, physiological measurements, number of attendances, comorbidities, and medications were adjusted for in the propensity weightings and regression analyses.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up of 6.5 years, the total number of new CVD events was 52,428. Compared with patients in the 1st quartile, patients in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles of the UCPI had a CVD hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.95 (0.92-0.97), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), and 0.87 (0.84-0.89), respectively, indicating that higher continuity of care was associated with lower CVD risks. The subtypes of CVD, including coronary heart disease and stroke, also showed a similar pattern. Subgroup analyses suggested that patients <65 years of age had greater benefits from higher team-based continuity of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Team-based continuity of care was associated with lower CVD risk among individuals with type 2 diabetes, especially those who were younger. This suggests a potential flexible alternative implementation of continuity of care in public clinics.

摘要

目的

心血管疾病(CVD)是糖尿病的长期后遗症。据报道,更好的基于个体的连续性护理可降低糖尿病患者慢性并发症的风险。维持一对一的医患关系往往具有挑战性,尤其是在公共卫生保健环境中。本研究旨在评估更高的基于团队的连续性护理(定义为由同一医生团队提供的会诊)与公立基层医疗诊所糖尿病患者CVD风险之间的关系。

研究设计与方法

这是一项在香港进行的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为312,068例2型糖尿病患者,基线时无任何CVD病史(定义为2008年至2018年期间最早在公立诊所就诊)。基于团队的连续性护理采用常规提供者连续性指数(UPCI)进行衡量,该指数通过基线前2年中就诊最多的医生团队提供的会诊比例计算得出。根据UPCI将患者分为四分位数,并使用倾向评分精细分层权重使四分位数的特征达到平衡。应用多变量Cox回归评估基于团队的连续性护理对CVD发病率的影响。在倾向权重和回归分析中对患者人口统计学、吸烟状况、生理测量、就诊次数、合并症和用药情况进行了调整。

结果

平均随访6.5年后,新发生的CVD事件总数为52,428例。与第一四分位数的患者相比,UPCI第二、第三和第四四分位数的患者CVD风险比(95%CI)分别为0.95(0.92 - 0.97)、0.92(0.89 - 0.94)和0.87(0.84 - 0.89),表明更高的连续性护理与更低的CVD风险相关。CVD的亚型,包括冠心病和中风,也呈现出类似的模式。亚组分析表明,65岁以下的患者从更高的基于团队的连续性护理中获益更大。

结论

基于团队的连续性护理与2型糖尿病患者较低的CVD风险相关,尤其是年轻患者。这表明在公立诊所中连续性护理可能有潜在的灵活替代实施方式。

相似文献

1
Association Between Team-Based Continuity of Care and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases Among Patients With Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.糖尿病患者中基于团队的连续性护理与心血管疾病风险之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
Diabetes Care. 2022 May 1;45(5):1162-1169. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1217.
2
Team-based continuity of care for patients with hypertension: a retrospective primary care cohort study in Hong Kong.基于团队的高血压患者连续性护理:香港的一项回顾性初级保健队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e807-e815. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0150. Print 2023 Nov.
3
Associations between usual glycated haemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 10-year diabetes cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平与心血管疾病的相关性:一项为期 10 年的糖尿病队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Dec;22(12):2325-2334. doi: 10.1111/dom.14157. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
Patient Empowerment Programme in primary care reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based propensity-matched cohort study.初级保健中的患者赋权计划降低了 2 型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率和心血管疾病:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):128-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.12397. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
Consultation rates in people with type 2 diabetes with and without vascular complications: a retrospective analysis of 141,328 adults in England.有和无血管并发症的 2 型糖尿病患者的就诊率:对英格兰 141328 名成年人的回顾性分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Jan 10;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01435-y.
6
Association Between Primary Care Practitioner Empathy and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.初级保健医生同理心与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件和全因死亡率风险之间的关联:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):311-318. doi: 10.1370/afm.2421.
7
Assessment of Hypertension Complications and Health Service Use 5 Years After Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention.评估综合干预实施 5 年后高血压并发症和卫生服务利用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15064.
8
Effect of Achieved Systolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.基于人群的回顾性队列研究:实现的收缩压对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1134-1141. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2443. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Meat intake and incidence of cardiovascular disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis of the Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS).肉类摄入量与日本 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病发病风险的关系:日本糖尿病并发症研究(JDCS)分析。
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Feb;58(1):281-290. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1592-y. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Five-Year Effectiveness of the Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Programme-Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) on Diabetes-Related Complications and Health Service Uses-A Population-Based and Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.基于人群和倾向匹配队列研究:多学科风险评估和管理方案-糖尿病(RAMP-DM)对糖尿病相关并发症和卫生服务利用的 5 年效果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):49-59. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0426. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing Continuity of Care Through a Team-Based Care Approach: Implementation Challenges.通过团队式护理方法建立护理连续性:实施挑战。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251369674. doi: 10.1177/21501319251369674. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
2
Team-based continuity of care for patients with hypertension: a retrospective primary care cohort study in Hong Kong.基于团队的高血压患者连续性护理:香港的一项回顾性初级保健队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e807-e815. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0150. Print 2023 Nov.
3
Team-Based Diabetes Care in Ontario and Hong Kong: a Comparative Review.
安大略省和中国香港的基于团队的糖尿病护理:比较综述。
Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Jul;23(7):135-146. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01508-0. Epub 2023 Apr 12.