• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national datasets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after knee replacement?英国关节置换术后随访推荐(UK SAFE):对膝关节置换术后中晚期翻修风险的分析,能从全国范围内已链接、常规收集的数据集中学到什么?
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e046900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046900.
2
UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study.英国关节置换术后随访建议(UK SAFE):对髋关节置换术后中晚期翻修风险的分析,从链接的常规国家数据集能告诉我们什么?回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e050877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050877.
3
Towards UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): protocol for an evaluation of the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up, and the production of consensus-based recommendations.迈向英国关节置换术后随访推荐(UK SAFE):评估关节置换术后随访要求并制定基于共识的推荐的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e031351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031351.
4
Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.不明原因的单髁和全膝关节置换术后疼痛的翻修。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e126. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00791.
5
Obesity and revision surgery, mortality, and patient-reported outcomes after primary knee replacement surgery in the National Joint Registry: A UK cohort study.英国国家关节注册中心中肥胖与翻修手术、死亡率以及初次膝关节置换术后患者报告结局的关系:一项队列研究
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 16;18(7):e1003704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003704. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
7
Impact of a national enhanced recovery after surgery programme on patient outcomes of primary total knee replacement: an interrupted time series analysis from "The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man".国家术后加速康复计划对初次全膝关节置换术患者结局的影响:来自“英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处”的中断时间序列分析。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Sep;27(9):1280-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 10.
8
A Comparison of the Surgical Practice of Potential Revision Outlier Joint Replacement Surgeons With Non-outliers: A Case Control Study From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.潜在翻修 outliers 关节置换外科医生与非 outliers 手术实践的比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的病例对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1239-1245.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.金属对金属髋关节翻修手术后的结果取决于失败原因:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000029.
10
Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.验证在高容量骨科中心进行的全髋关节和膝关节置换术的修订数据与国家关节登记处的数据相符。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Oct 10;14(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1304-9.

引用本文的文献

1
[Current AWMF guidelines on knee and hip arthroplasty - individual risks].[德国医学专业协会当前关于膝关节和髋关节置换术的指南 - 个体风险]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;54(4):261-266. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04610-1. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
Mid- to late-term follow-up of primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the UK SAFE evidence-based recommendations.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术的中期至长期随访:英国SAFE循证推荐意见
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Feb 9;4(2):72-78. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0149.R1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the problematic knee replacement.问题膝关节置换术的调查。
Knee. 2020 Oct;27(5):1676-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.083. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
CPRD GOLD and linked ONS mortality records: Reconciling guidelines.CPRD GOLD 和链接的 ONS 死亡率记录:协调指南。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104038. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
3
Chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后的慢性疼痛。
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Aug 16;3(8):461-470. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180004. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Approach to record linkage of primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink to other health-related patient data: overview and implications.临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)初级保健数据与其他健康相关患者数据的记录链接方法:概述及意义。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0442-4. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
5
The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study.患者干预时年龄对髋或膝关节置换后植入物翻修风险的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424-1430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30059-4. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
6
Risk factors for persistent and new chronic opioid use in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.全髋关节置换术患者持续和新发慢性阿片类药物使用的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e010664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010664.
7
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.英国全髋关节和膝关节置换术的未来预测:来自英国临床实践研究数据链的结果
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Apr;23(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
9
A survey of the current state of hip arthroplasty surveillance in the United Kingdom.英国髋关节置换术监测现状调查
Musculoskeletal Care. 2014 Dec;12(4):232-8. doi: 10.1002/msc.1077. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
10
A population-based survival analysis describing the association of body mass index on time to revision for total hip and knee replacements: results from the UK general practice research database.基于人群的生存分析描述了体重指数与全髋关节和膝关节置换术翻修时间的关系:来自英国普通实践研究数据库的结果。
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 27;3(11):e003614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003614.

英国关节置换术后随访推荐(UK SAFE):对膝关节置换术后中晚期翻修风险的分析,能从全国范围内已链接、常规收集的数据集中学到什么?

UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national datasets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after knee replacement?

机构信息

Department of Health & Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e046900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046900.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046900
PMID:35264336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8915365/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients at risk of mid-late term revision of knee replacement (KR) to inform targeted follow-up.

DESIGN

Analysis of linked national datasets from primary and secondary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD GOLD), National Joint Registry (NJR), English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)).

PARTICIPANTS

Primary elective KRs aged ≥18 years.

EVENT OF INTEREST

Revision surgery ≥5 years (mid-late term) postprimary KR.

STATISTICAL METHODS

Cox regression modelling to ascertain risk factors of mid-late term revision. HRs and 95% CIs assessed association of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, medication, surgical variables and PROMs with mid-late term revision.

RESULTS

NJR-HES-PROMs data were available from 2008 to 2011 on 188 509 KR. CPRD GOLD-HES data covered 1995-2011 on 17 378 KR. Patients had minimum 5 years postprimary surgery to end 2016. Age and gender distribution were similar across datasets; mean age 70 years, 57% female. In NJR, there were 8607 (4.6%) revisions, median time-to-revision postprimary surgery 1.8 years (range 0-8.8), with 1055 (0.6%) mid-late term revisions; in CPRD GOLD, 877 (5.1%) revisions, median time-to-revision 4.2 years (range 0.02-18.3), with 352 (2.0%) mid-late term revisions.Reduced risk of revision after 5 years was associated with older age (HR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.95 to 0.96), obesity (0.70; 0.56 to 0.88), living in deprived areas (0.71; 0.58 to 0.87), non-white ethnicity (0.58; 0.43 to 0.78), better preoperative pain and functional limitation (0.42; 0.33 to 0.53), better 6-month postoperative pain and function (0.33; 0.26 to 0.41) or moderate anxiety/depression (0.73; 0.63 to 0.83) at primary surgery.Increased risk was associated with male gender (1.32; 1.04 to 1.67); when anticonvulsants (gabapentin and pregabalin) (1.58; 1.01 to 2.47) or opioids (1.36; 1.08 to 1.71) were required prior to primary surgery.No implant factors were identified.

CONCLUSION

The risk of mid-late term KR revision is very low. Increased risk of revision is associated with patient case-mix factors, and there is evidence of sociodemographic inequality.

摘要

目的

确定需要进行膝关节置换术(KR)中期至晚期翻修的患者,以便进行有针对性的随访。

设计

对初级和二级护理的全国性数据集(临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD GOLD)、国家联合登记处(NJR)、英国医院入院统计(HES)和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs))进行分析。

参与者

年龄≥18 岁的初次择期 KR。

研究事件

初次 KR 后≥5 年(中期至晚期)的翻修手术。

统计方法

Cox 回归模型确定中期至晚期翻修的危险因素。HR 和 95%CI 评估社会人口统计学因素、合并症、药物、手术变量和 PROMs 与中期至晚期翻修的关联。

结果

NJR-HES-PROMs 数据可获得 2008 年至 2011 年 188509 例 KR 的信息。CPRD GOLD-HES 数据可获得 1995 年至 2011 年 17378 例 KR 的信息。患者在初次手术后至少有 5 年的时间,随访截止到 2016 年。各数据集的年龄和性别分布相似;平均年龄为 70 岁,57%为女性。在 NJR 中,有 8607 例(4.6%)翻修,初次手术后中位时间至翻修为 1.8 年(范围 0-8.8),其中 1055 例(0.6%)为中期至晚期翻修;在 CPRD GOLD 中,有 877 例(5.1%)翻修,初次手术后中位时间至翻修为 4.2 年(范围 0.02-18.3),其中 352 例(2.0%)为中期至晚期翻修。在初次手术后 5 年,与翻修风险降低相关的因素包括年龄较大(HR:0.95;95%CI:0.95-0.96)、肥胖(0.70;0.56-0.88)、居住在贫困地区(0.71;0.58-0.87)、非白人种族(0.58;0.43-0.78)、术前疼痛和功能障碍较轻(0.42;0.33-0.53)、术后 6 个月疼痛和功能较好(0.33;0.26-0.41)或中度焦虑/抑郁(0.73;0.63-0.83)。与女性(1.32;1.04-1.67)、术前需要使用抗惊厥药(加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林)(1.58;1.01-2.47)或阿片类药物(1.36;1.08-1.71)有关的风险增加。未发现与植入物相关的因素。

结论

膝关节置换术中期至晚期翻修的风险非常低。翻修风险增加与患者的病例组合因素有关,并且存在社会人口统计学不平等的证据。