Stephen Ekpenyong Mandu, Nyashanu Mathew, Ossey-Nweze Chioma, Serrant Laura
Research Association, Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
Health and Social Care/Public Health, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
J Res Nurs. 2021 Sep;26(6):517-537. doi: 10.1177/1744987121997890. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Patients have a right to be treated with dignity. However, reports have continually identified concerns regarding the quality of care and dignity in hospitals. Undignified care can have unfavourable impact on the patient's recovery such as leading to depression and loss of will to live. The aim of this study was to explore dignity as perceived by patients and nurses within hospital and community environments.
An integrative review methodological approach was adopted. Nine databases including Medline, CINAHL plus with full text, Web of Science, Embase, Pubmed, Psycinfo, Scopus, Nursing and Allied Health Source, and Science Direct were systematically searched for relevant articles using a predetermined set of inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they were primary empirical studies, peer reviewed, published between 2008-2019, assessing patients' or nurses' perception of dignity outside the end-of-life context, conducted in one of the European countries and written in English. Included papers were analysed using constant comparative analysis. The preferred reporting system for systematic review and meta-analysis (Prisma) flow diagram was used for quality appraisal and review.
Fourteen relevant articles were included in this review. Four overarching themes and 10 subthemes were identified as impacting on patient dignity. Overarching themes include autonomy, healthcare delivery factors, organisational factors and the meaning of dignity, whilst subthemes include dependence/independence, choice, staff attitudes, communication, privacy, structure of services, staff shortages, physical environment, respect and person-centred care.
There are a wide range of factors impacting on patient dignity. Adopting evidence-based interventions supported by adequate theoretical backing can help to enhance patient dignity in hospital and community settings.
患者有权受到有尊严的治疗。然而,报告不断指出人们对医院护理质量和尊严存在担忧。缺乏尊严的护理可能会对患者的康复产生不利影响,例如导致抑郁和失去生存意志。本研究的目的是探讨患者和护士在医院和社区环境中所感受到的尊严。
采用综合综述的方法。使用预先确定的纳入标准,系统检索了九个数据库,包括Medline、CINAHL全文数据库、科学引文索引、Embase、PubMed、Psycinfo、Scopus、护理及相关健康资源数据库和Science Direct,以查找相关文章。如果文章是原发性实证研究、经过同行评审、在2008年至2019年之间发表、评估患者或护士在临终关怀背景之外对尊严的认知、在欧洲国家之一进行且用英文撰写,则纳入研究。使用持续比较分析法对纳入的论文进行分析。采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告系统(Prisma)流程图进行质量评估和综述。
本综述纳入了14篇相关文章。确定了影响患者尊严的四个总体主题和10个子主题。总体主题包括自主性、医疗服务提供因素、组织因素和尊严的意义,而子主题包括依赖/独立、选择、工作人员态度、沟通、隐私、服务结构、人员短缺、物理环境、尊重和以患者为中心的护理。
有多种因素影响患者尊严。采用有充分理论支持的循证干预措施有助于提高医院和社区环境中的患者尊严。