Suppr超能文献

一项评价口服康替唑与利奈唑胺治疗成人复杂性皮肤软组织感染的疗效和安全性的 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲临床试验。

A Phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

机构信息

Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 May 29;77(6):1762-1769. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac073.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent for managing infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant strains. A Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs).

METHODS

Adult patients with cSSTI were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive contezolid 800 mg or linezolid 600 mg q12h for 7-14 days. Clinical cure rate and safety were assessed at the test of cure (TOC) visit in the full analysis set (FAS) and clinical evaluable (CE) population. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI around the treatment difference of clinical cure rates greater than -10%. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn registration identifier: CTR20150855.

RESULTS

Clinical cure rates at TOC indicated non-inferiority of contezolid 800 mg to linezolid 600 mg q12h for patients in the FAS with clinical evaluation, FAS, and CE populations: 92.8% (271/292) versus 93.4% (284/304) (difference -0.6%, 95% CI: -4.7% to 3.5%), 81.4% (271/333) versus 84.5% (284/336) (difference -3.1%, 95% CI: -8.8% to 2.6%) and 90.5% (267/295) versus 90.1% (282/313) (difference 0.4%, 95% CI: -4.3% to 5.1%). Contezolid and linezolid showed similar efficacy for the cSSTIs caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Contezolid demonstrated significant lower incidence of leucopenia (0.3% versus 3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (0% versus 2.3%) than linezolid. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of cSSTIs in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities.

摘要

目的

康替唑胺是一种新型噁唑烷酮类抗菌药物,用于治疗需氧和厌氧革兰阳性菌引起的感染,包括耐甲氧西林菌株。一项 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性对照临床试验评估了康替唑胺与利奈唑胺治疗成人复杂性皮肤和软组织感染(cSSTIs)的疗效和安全性。

方法

cSSTI 成年患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为康替唑胺 800mg 或利奈唑胺 600mg q12h 组,治疗 7-14 天。在全分析集(FAS)和临床可评价(CE)人群中,在治疗结束时(TOC)访视评估临床治愈率和安全性。非劣效性定义为治疗差异临床治愈率 95%CI 下限大于-10%。Chinadrugtrials.org.cn 注册号:CTR20150855。

结果

TOC 时的临床治愈率表明,在 FAS 中有临床评估、FAS 和 CE 人群中,康替唑胺 800mg 与利奈唑胺 600mg q12h 相比具有非劣效性:92.8%(271/292)与 93.4%(284/304)(差值-0.6%,95%CI:-4.7%至 3.5%),81.4%(271/333)与 84.5%(284/336)(差值-3.1%,95%CI:-8.8%至 2.6%)和 90.5%(267/295)与 90.1%(282/313)(差值 0.4%,95%CI:-4.3%至 5.1%)。康替唑胺和利奈唑胺对耐甲氧西林敏感或耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的 cSSTIs 具有相似的疗效。康替唑胺导致白细胞减少(0.3%对 3.4%)和血小板减少(0%对 2.3%)的发生率明显低于利奈唑胺。两组治疗中出现的不良事件发生率相似。

结论

康替唑胺 800mg q12h 与利奈唑胺治疗成人 cSSTIs 同样有效,但在血液学异常方面比利奈唑胺更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验