• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SWEEPS、PIPS、超声和超声辅助冲洗激活技术后术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验。

Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Cumhuriyet Mahallesi Sahilyolu Cad. No: 5 Kepez, Çanakkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Odontology. 2022 Oct;110(4):786-794. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00700-0. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10266-022-00700-0
PMID:35267110
Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of a new laser irrigation activation system [shock wave-enhanced emission photo-acoustic streaming (SWEEPS)] in terms of postoperative pain after primary root canal treatment compared with other techniques, namely photon-induced photo-acoustic streaming (PIPS), sonic system with EDDY, passive ultrasonic system (PUI), and manual dynamic activation (MDA). Two hundred patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular premolar teeth were enrolled and randomly allocated to five different irrigation activation groups (n = 40) after chemo-mechanical root canal preparation. For irrigation activation, the SWEEPS and PIPS tips were attached to the Er-YAG laser system in the respective groups, while the Irrisafe tip was used in the PUI group and the EDDY tip in the sonic group. In the MDA group, irrigation was agitated with the master gutta-percha cone. At postoperative hours 8, 24, and 48 and on day 7, pain intensity was evaluated using the 10-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and analgesic intake was recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the VAS scores, and pain prevalence and analgesic intake were examined with the Pearson's chi-square test at the 5% significance level. The PIPS and SWEEPS groups had the lowest level and prevalence of pain when compared to the remaining groups (P < 0.001). The PUI, sonic and MDA groups did not differ in terms of pain scores at hours 8 and 48 (P > 0.05). On day 7, the highest score and pain prevalence were recorded in the MDA group (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of analgesic intake (P > 0.05). Laser-activated irrigation systems provided lower postoperative pain scores and levels compared to the other activation systems. The MDA group had the highest pain scores and incidence at the end of the seventh day.

摘要

为了研究一种新的激光冲洗激活系统[冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)]在原发性根管治疗后术后疼痛方面的疗效,与其他技术相比,即光子诱导光声流(PIPS)、带有 EDDY 的声系统、被动超声系统(PUI)和手动动态激活(MDA)。将 200 名下颌前磨牙有症状不可复性牙髓炎的患者纳入研究,并在化学机械根管预备后随机分为 5 个不同的冲洗激活组(n=40)。对于冲洗激活,SWEEPS 和 PIPS 尖端分别连接到 Er-YAG 激光系统中,而 Irrisafe 尖端用于 PUI 组,EDDY 尖端用于声组。在 MDA 组中,用主牙胶尖搅拌冲洗。在术后 8、24 和 48 小时以及第 7 天,使用 10mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度,并记录镇痛药摄入量。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验分析 VAS 评分,采用 Pearson 卡方检验分析疼痛发生率和镇痛药摄入,检验水准为 5%。与其他组相比,PIPS 和 SWEEPS 组的疼痛程度最低,疼痛发生率最低(P<0.001)。在 8 小时和 48 小时,PUI、声组和 MDA 组的疼痛评分没有差异(P>0.05)。在第 7 天,MDA 组记录到最高的评分和疼痛发生率(P<0.001)。各组之间的镇痛药摄入量无差异(P>0.05)。激光激活冲洗系统比其他激活系统提供的术后疼痛评分和水平更低。在第 7 天结束时,MDA 组的疼痛评分和发生率最高。

相似文献

1
Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.SWEEPS、PIPS、超声和超声辅助冲洗激活技术后术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
Odontology. 2022 Oct;110(4):786-794. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00700-0. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study.Er:YAG 激光激活冲洗与被动超声冲洗和超声动力冲洗治疗人工沟槽和牙本质小管中多物种生物膜的体外疗效:SEM 和 CLSM 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x.
3
Antimicrobial effectiveness of different irrigation activation techniques on teeth with artificial internal root resorption and contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis: a confocal laser scanning,icroscopy analysis.不同冲洗激活技术对感染粪肠球菌的伴有人工内吸收牙的抗菌效果:激光共聚焦显微镜分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Mar 21;38(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03748-8.
4
The effect of different irrigation activation methods on the penetration of the irrigation solution into the dentinal tubules in teeth with calcium hydroxide applied and oval-shaped canals: Confocal laser scanning microscope analysis.不同冲洗激活方法对应用氢氧化钙和椭圆形根管牙内牙本质小管内冲洗液渗透的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜分析。
Microsc Res Tech. 2024 Sep;87(9):2194-2203. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24594. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration.研究声、超声和新型激光辅助冲洗激活方法对清除玷污层和根管穿透的效果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jan 3;38(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03697-8.
6
Comparison of the removal of intracanal medicaments used in regenerative endodontics from root canal system using needle, ultrasonic, sonic, and laser-activated irrigation systems.比较使用针、超声、声和激光激活冲洗系统从根管系统中清除再生内科学中使用的根管内药物。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jan 12;39(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03980-w.
7
Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.不同冲洗激活系统对根管清洁效果的 SEM 评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Comparative analysis of reduction in pain scores after single visit root canal treatment using endodontic irrigation protocols, namely, Conventional needle irrigation, PUI, PIPS and SWEEPS: A randomized control trial.使用牙髓冲洗方案(即传统针管冲洗、脉冲超声冲洗、被动超声冲洗和声波激活冲洗)进行单次就诊根管治疗后疼痛评分降低情况的比较分析:一项随机对照试验。
J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):143-149. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation-an ex vivo study.使用 FESEM 评价保守形根管内玷污层的去除:激光激活冲洗(PIPS 和 SWEEPS)与超声和被动超声荡洗的比较——一项离体研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01427-0.
10
Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial.超声联合激光冲洗在根管治疗术后疼痛的随机临床试验。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1037-1050. doi: 10.1111/iej.13500. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of efficacy of SmartLite Pro EndoActivator sonic activation using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence meter: A randomized clinical trial.使用三磷酸腺苷生物发光仪评估SmartLite Pro根管激活器声波激活效果的随机临床试验。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):619-625. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_235_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
SWEEPS-Assisted Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy Against Dual-Species Biofilms in Mandibular Molars: An In Vitro Study.扫描辅助抗菌光动力疗法治疗下颌磨牙双菌种生物膜:一项体外研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 10;18(4):558. doi: 10.3390/ph18040558.
3
Research progress in problem-solving nickel-titanium rotary instrument in endodontics.

本文引用的文献

1
FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation-an ex vivo study.使用 FESEM 评价保守形根管内玷污层的去除:激光激活冲洗(PIPS 和 SWEEPS)与超声和被动超声荡洗的比较——一项离体研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01427-0.
2
Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial.超声联合激光冲洗在根管治疗术后疼痛的随机临床试验。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1037-1050. doi: 10.1111/iej.13500. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
根管治疗用镍钛器械的研究进展。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 1;42(6):699-705. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024225.
4
Lasers efficacy in pain management after primary and secondary endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.激光在原发性和继发性根管治疗后疼痛管理中的疗效:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):26028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74998-x.
5
Assessment of apical extrusion in regenerative endodontics: a comparative study of different irrigation methods using three-dimensional immature tooth models.再生牙髓治疗中根尖微渗漏的评估:使用三维未成熟牙模型对不同冲洗方法的比较研究
Odontology. 2025 Jan;113(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00961-x. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Can diode laser 810 nm decrease post endodontic pain in patients with asymptomatic necrotic maxillary incisors? A four-arm randomized controlled trial.810纳米二极管激光能否减轻无症状性上颌中切牙坏死患者根管治疗后的疼痛?一项四臂随机对照试验。
BDJ Open. 2024 Mar 14;10(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00203-w.
7
Comparation of the effectiveness of conventional needle irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming with sodium hypochorite in the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial.传统针管冲洗与光致光声流联合次氯酸钠治疗根尖周炎牙齿的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04055-6.
8
In vitro efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic-powered irrigation for treating multispecies biofilms in artificial grooves and dentinal tubules: an SEM and CLSM study.Er:YAG 激光激活冲洗与被动超声冲洗和超声动力冲洗治疗人工沟槽和牙本质小管中多物种生物膜的体外疗效:SEM 和 CLSM 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04042-x.
9
In Vitro Assessment of SWEEPS and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Alone or in Combination for Eradicating Biofilm in Root Canals.单独或联合使用SWEEPS和抗菌光动力疗法根除根管生物膜的体外评估
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Nov 15;15(11):2628. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112628.
10
The effect of the irrigant activation protocol on postoperative pain in maxillary incisors with asymptomatic apical periodontitis: A three-arm randomized clinical trial.冲洗液激活方案对上颌切牙无症状根尖周炎术后疼痛的影响:一项三臂随机临床试验。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Oct;9(5):868-878. doi: 10.1002/cre2.786. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation using SWEEPS and PIPS technique on dye penetration depth after root canal preparation.
使用SWEEPS和PIPS技术的铒激光照射对根管预备后染料渗透深度的影响。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Mar;33:102136. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102136. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Real-time intracanal temperature measurement comparing mechanically and laser-activated irrigation to syringe irrigation.比较机械和激光激活冲洗与注射器冲洗的实时根管内温度测量。
Aust Endod J. 2021 Apr;47(1):59-66. doi: 10.1111/aej.12461. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
Postoperative pain after different irrigation activation techniques: a randomized, clinical trial.不同冲洗激活技术后术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Postoperative Pain after Treatment Using the GentleWave System: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用 GentleWave 系统治疗后的术后疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1017-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
7
Measurement of Pressures Generated in Root Canal During Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation.铒激光激活冲洗过程中根管内产生压力的测量
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Oct;38(10):625-631. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4776. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment.冲洗液激活、浓度和接触时间对次氯酸钠进入根管牙本质的渗透影响:一项离体实验。
Int Endod J. 2020 Jul;53(7):986-997. doi: 10.1111/iej.13290. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Effect of different laser-assisted irrigation activation techniques on apical debris extrusion.不同激光辅助冲洗激活技术对根尖碎屑挤出的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Jul;78(5):332-336. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1717603. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Postoperative pain following endodontic irrigation using 1.3% versus 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in mandibular molars with necrotic pulps: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.下颌磨牙牙髓坏死患者应用 1.3%次氯酸钠与 5.25%次氯酸钠根管冲洗后的术后疼痛:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Int Endod J. 2020 Feb;53(2):154-166. doi: 10.1111/iej.13222. Epub 2019 Oct 23.