Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1017-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
Cleaning and shaping are necessary to allow for the delivery of irrigants and medicaments to the apical third of the canal. Standard treatment irrigation generally uses a conventional needle and some frequency of sonic activation. The GentleWave System (GWS; Sonendo, Inc, Laguna Hills, CA) combines irrigant delivery with multisonic activation. This randomized clinical trial aimed to determine if the GWS significantly decreases the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain.
Patients used a numeric rating scale to record their pain level at the 6-hour time point before treatment. All participants were randomly divided into 2 groups and were blind to the treatment they received. The standard (control) group received endodontic treatment with conventional side-vented needle irrigation and ultrasonic activation. The second group received treatment with the GWS. Following treatment, patients used a numeric rating scale to record their pain level at 6, 24, 72, and 168 hours.
In the standard treatment group, 72.2% of patients experienced at least 1 occurrence of postoperative pain, whereas in the GWS group, 83.3% of patients experienced at least 1 occurrence of postoperative pain. The highest pain intensity level for both treatments occurred at the 6-hour posttreatment time point. All pain decreased with time after the 6-hour posttreatment time point (P < 1.237e).
There was no significant difference in the incidence or intensity of postoperative pain after either treatment group. However, both groups reported a statistically significant decrease in pain with time.
清洁和成形是必要的,以允许冲洗剂和药物输送到根管的根尖三分之一。标准的治疗冲洗通常使用传统的针和一些超声激活的频率。 GentleWave 系统(GWS;Sonendo,Inc,拉古纳山,CA)将冲洗剂输送与多声激活相结合。这项随机临床试验旨在确定 GWS 是否能显著降低术后疼痛的发生率和强度。
患者使用数字评分量表记录治疗前 6 小时的疼痛水平。所有参与者被随机分为 2 组,并对他们接受的治疗保持盲法。标准(对照组)组接受常规侧孔针冲洗和超声激活的牙髓治疗。第二组接受 GWS 治疗。治疗后,患者使用数字评分量表记录治疗后 6、24、72 和 168 小时的疼痛水平。
在标准治疗组中,72.2%的患者至少发生 1 次术后疼痛,而在 GWS 组中,83.3%的患者至少发生 1 次术后疼痛。两种治疗方法的最高疼痛强度水平均发生在治疗后 6 小时。所有疼痛在治疗后 6 小时后随时间下降(P<1.237e)。
两种治疗组术后疼痛的发生率或强度均无显著差异。然而,两组都报告说疼痛随时间的推移显著下降。