Department of Health Sciences, College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 3;14(5):1076. doi: 10.3390/nu14051076.
Background: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with sleep disorders and poor sleep quality. Whether vitamin D supplementation (VDS) helps resolve these problems remains unclear. Objective: To systematically review the effect of VDS on sleep quantity, quality, and disorders, and perform a meta-analysis of available data. Methods: The reporting of this review followed the PRISMA statement. VDS human interventions studies that reported on sleep quality, quantity, or disorders were included. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ICTRP were searched, in addition to the references of the included articles and previous relevant reviews, without language or time restrictions. Included studies were critically appraised, findings were narratively synthesized, and a meta-analysis was conducted. Furthermore, the overall certainty of the evidence was assessed. Results: A total of 19 studies were included (13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 opportunistic addition to an RCT, 4 pre−post studies, and 1 pre−post study analyzed as a case series); 3 RCTs were meta-analyses. The risk of bias was generally low. Pre−post studies showed a significant improvement in sleep quality with VDS. Similarly, the results of the meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index with VDS compared with placebo (mean difference, −2.33 (95% CI, −3.09, −1.57); p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), with a moderate certainty of evidence. The results regarding the effect of VDS on sleep-related impairment, difficulty, and disorders, as well as sleepiness and restless legs syndrome, were not unanimous. Conclusions: VDS is promising in improving sleep quality; however, its effect on sleep quantity and disorders needs to be further investigated.
维生素 D 缺乏与睡眠障碍和睡眠质量差有关。补充维生素 D(VDS)是否有助于解决这些问题尚不清楚。目的:系统回顾 VDS 对睡眠数量、质量和障碍的影响,并对现有数据进行荟萃分析。方法:本研究报告遵循 PRISMA 声明。纳入了报告睡眠质量、数量或障碍的 VDS 人体干预研究。检索了 Medline、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycInfo、Cochrane 图书馆、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 ICTRP,此外还检索了纳入文章的参考文献和以前的相关综述,没有语言和时间限制。对纳入的研究进行了严格评估,对研究结果进行了叙述性综合,并进行了荟萃分析。此外,还评估了证据的总体确定性。结果:共纳入 19 项研究(13 项随机对照试验(RCT)、1 项 RCT 的机会性附加研究、4 项前后研究和 1 项作为病例系列进行的前后研究);3 项 RCT 为荟萃分析。偏倚风险普遍较低。前后研究表明,VDS 可显著改善睡眠质量。同样,荟萃分析的结果表明,与安慰剂相比,VDS 可显著降低匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(mean difference,-2.33(95% CI,-3.09,-1.57);p < 0.001;I2 = 0%),证据确定性为中等。关于 VDS 对睡眠相关障碍、入睡困难和障碍、嗜睡和不安腿综合征的影响的结果并不一致。结论:VDS 有望改善睡眠质量;然而,其对睡眠数量和障碍的影响需要进一步研究。