• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述加利福尼亚州在 COVID-19 大流行期间的安全网计划和政策的全景。

Characterizing the Landscape of Safety Net Programs and Policies in California during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 26;19(5):2747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052747.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19052747
PMID:35270441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8910353/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid and innovative policymaking around the world at the national, regional, and local levels. There has been limited work to systematically document and characterize new and expanded local U.S. pandemic-era policies, which is imperative to better understand the policy variation and resulting health impacts during this unprecedented time. California, the most populous U.S. state, provides a case example of a particularly active policy response. The aim of this Brief Report is to summarize the creation and potential areas of application of a newly created publicly available California- and US-based COVID-19 policy database. We generated an extensive list of California and US policies that were modified or created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. From July-November 2021, we searched current and historical California and federal government websites, press releases, social media, and news sources and recorded detailed information on these policies, including coverage dates, eligibility criteria, and benefit amounts. This comprehensive dataset includes 39 public health, economic, housing, and safety net programs and policies implemented at both federal and state levels and provides details of the complex and multifaceted policy landscape in California from March 2020 to November 2021. Our database is publicly available. Future investigators can leverage the information systematically recorded in this database to rigorously assess the short- and long-term effects of these policies, which will in turn inform future preparedness response plans in California and beyond.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行促使全球各国、各地区和地方层面在国家层面上迅速制定创新政策。对于系统地记录和描述美国新的和扩大的大流行时期政策,以及在这一前所未有的时期更好地了解政策变化和由此产生的健康影响,所做的工作有限。加利福尼亚州是美国人口最多的州,为特别积极的政策应对提供了一个案例。本简要报告的目的是总结新创建的加利福尼亚州和美国基于 COVID-19 政策数据库的创建和潜在应用领域。我们生成了一份广泛的加利福尼亚州和美国政策清单,这些政策是为应对 COVID-19 大流行而修改或制定的。在 2021 年 7 月至 11 月期间,我们搜索了加利福尼亚州和联邦政府的当前和历史网站、新闻稿、社交媒体和新闻来源,并记录了这些政策的详细信息,包括覆盖日期、资格标准和福利金额。这个综合数据集包括 39 个公共卫生、经济、住房和社会安全网计划和政策,这些计划和政策是在联邦和州一级实施的,并提供了 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月加利福尼亚州复杂而多方面的政策格局的详细信息。我们的数据库是公开的。未来的研究人员可以利用该数据库中系统记录的信息来严格评估这些政策的短期和长期影响,这反过来又将为加利福尼亚州乃至其他地区的未来备灾应对计划提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5240/8910353/079c430c4c1d/ijerph-19-02747-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5240/8910353/079c430c4c1d/ijerph-19-02747-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5240/8910353/079c430c4c1d/ijerph-19-02747-g001a.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterizing the Landscape of Safety Net Programs and Policies in California during the COVID-19 Pandemic.描述加利福尼亚州在 COVID-19 大流行期间的安全网计划和政策的全景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 26;19(5):2747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052747.
2
The U.S. COVID-19 County Policy Database: a novel resource to support pandemic-related research.美国 COVID-19 县政策数据库:支持大流行相关研究的新型资源。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):1882. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14132-6.
3
A database of US state policies to mitigate COVID-19 and its economic consequences.美国州级政策数据库,旨在减轻 COVID-19 及其经济影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):1124. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13487-0.
4
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Public support for U.S. social safety net policies throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.美国民众在整个新冠疫情期间对社会安全网政策的支持。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106873. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106873. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
Experiences of distress and gaps in government safety net supports among parents of young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.新冠疫情期间,幼儿父母的痛苦经历和政府安全网支持的差距:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16037-4.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
9
A Panel Evaluation of the Changes in the General Public's Social-Media-Following of United States' Public Health Departments during COVID-19 Pandemic.公众对美国公共卫生部门在 COVID-19 大流行期间社交媒体关注度的变化的小组评估。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:2150132721995450. doi: 10.1177/2150132721995450.
10
The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic Policy on Social Needs Across the State of Kansas and Western Missouri: Paired Survey Response Testing.新冠疫情政策对堪萨斯州和密苏里州西部地区社会需求的影响:配对调查响应测试。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 25;9:e41369. doi: 10.2196/41369.

引用本文的文献

1
Easing Cash Assistance Rules and Breastfeeding.放宽现金援助规定与母乳喂养。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252999. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2999.
2
Trajectories and patterns of US counties' policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: A sequence analysis approach.美国各县对新冠疫情的政策应对轨迹与模式:一种序列分析方法
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Dec 10;29:101734. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101734. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Food Insufficiency Increased After The Expiration Of COVID-19 Emergency Allotments For SNAP Benefits In 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The long-term impact of the COVID-19 unemployment shock on life expectancy and mortality rates.新冠疫情导致失业对预期寿命和死亡率的长期影响。
J Econ Dyn Control. 2023 Jan;146:104581. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104581. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies.《评估难:政策并存如何影响社会政策健康影响研究》
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):19-32. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab009.
3
How does income affect mental health and health behaviours? A quasi-experimental study of the earned income tax credit.
2023 年,新冠疫情紧急拨款结束后,食品不足的情况在补充营养援助计划(SNAP)中增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Oct;43(10):1464-1474. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01566.
4
The association of increased SNAP benefits during COVID-19 with food insufficiency and anxiety among US adults: a quasi-experimental study.新冠疫情期间补充营养援助项目(SNAP)福利增加与美国成年人食物不足和焦虑的关联:一项准实验研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Sep 27;27(1):e186. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001447.
5
Maternal Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的孕产妇健康:一项中断时间序列分析。
Epidemiology. 2024 Nov 1;35(6):823-833. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001779. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
6
The association of safety-net program participation with government perceptions, welfare stigma, and discrimination.安全网项目参与与政府认知、福利污名及歧视之间的关联。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Dec 21;2(1):qxad084. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad084. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Experiences of distress and gaps in government safety net supports among parents of young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.新冠疫情期间,幼儿父母的痛苦经历和政府安全网支持的差距:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16037-4.
8
Pandemic-related socioeconomic disruptions and adverse health outcomes: a cross-sectional study of female caregivers.与大流行相关的社会经济动荡和不良健康结果:女性照顾者的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;22(1):1893. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14287-2.
收入如何影响心理健康和健康行为?所得收入税收抵免的准实验研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Oct;75(10):929-935. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214841. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Mask adherence and rate of COVID-19 across the United States.美国各地的口罩佩戴率和 COVID-19 感染率。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249891. eCollection 2021.
5
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Unmet Social Needs And Worse Mental Health After Expiration Of COVID-19 Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation.新冠疫情联邦失业补偿期满后,未满足的社会需求和更糟糕的心理健康状况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):426-434. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01990. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Association Between Receipt of Unemployment Insurance and Food Insecurity Among People Who Lost Employment During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国在新冠疫情期间失业人群领取失业救济金与食物不安全之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035884. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35884.
8
Very Low Food Security Among Low-Income Households With Children in California Before and Shortly After the Economic Downturn From COVID-19.加利福尼亚州有子女的低收入家庭在新冠疫情经济衰退前后的食品极度不安全状况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Jan 7;18:E01. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200517.
9
Impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on the incidence of preterm birth: a national quasi-experimental study.COVID-19 缓解措施对早产发生率的影响:一项全国准实验研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Nov;5(11):e604-e611. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30223-1. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources.新冠肺炎疫情期间的心理健康:居家政策、社交距离行为和社会资源的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113419. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419. Epub 2020 Aug 20.