School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Institute of Occupational Health, China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;19(5):2957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052957.
The method of flow ratio is often used for designing parallel push-pull ventilation. The value is mostly selected empirically and is difficult to determine accurately, resulting in an imprecise design of the push-pull ventilation system. Therefore, parallel push-pull ventilation was taken as the research object in this paper. The push-pull ventilation studied consists of a square uniform supply hood and a square uniform exhaust hood, and the side length of pull hood and pull hood was same. A workbench was set between the push hood and pull hood, and the source of toluene pollutions was set in the center of the worktable surface. The optimal values for different distances between push hood and pull hood were studied by numerical simulation using Ansys Fluent, which were obtained base on the distribution of wind speed and toluene concentration. The results showed that parallel push-pull ventilation is not suitable for applications when / ≥ 6. The changing patterns of value with / is proposed in the range of 1.5 ≤ / ≤ 5 for the parallel square push-pull ventilation, which can be used to estimate value relatively accurately under the condition that / is known, so as to guide the determination of the exhaust air volume of the parallel push-pull ventilation system.
流量比法常用于设计并行的推挽式通风。 值通常是根据经验选择的,难以准确确定,导致推挽式通风系统的设计不够精确。因此,本文以并行推挽式通风为研究对象。研究中的推挽式通风由正方形均匀送风罩和正方形均匀排风罩组成,且排风罩和吸风罩的边长相同。在送风罩和吸风罩之间设置一个工作台,在工作台表面的中心设置甲苯污染源。通过使用 Ansys Fluent 对不同的送风罩和吸风罩间距进行数值模拟,得到了基于风速和甲苯浓度分布的最佳 值。结果表明,当 / ≥ 6 时,并行推挽通风不适用。本文提出了在 1.5 ≤ / ≤ 5 的范围内,对于平行方形推挽通风, 值随 / 的变化规律,可在已知 / 的情况下,较准确地估算 值,从而指导平行推挽通风系统排风量的确定。