Health Service Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Kubota Corporation, Tsukubamirai, Japan.
J Occup Health. 2019 Jan;61(1):135-142. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12018.
Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations in the workplace is imperative. The purpose of this study was to reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in a hospital pathology laboratory, in which approximately 15 000 pathological diagnoses are conducted yearly, using hardware and software interventions.
Although this laboratory had various ventilation systems, the formaldehyde concentration was high. Based on the Japanese work environment measurement system, the workplace was categorized as control class III, suggesting that improvements to workplace conditions were required. First, engineering controls were implemented and workers were asked not to block the ventilation system and not to keep waste fluid tanks open. However, the workplace required further improvement. Next, using a video camera and a formaldehyde detector, we attempted to visually educate workers about how much formaldehyde is emitted from the sample container based on the type of action undertaken.
After the first intervention, the workplace improved to control class II. Control class II indicates that the workplace condition is between classes I and III; a good workplace condition is classified as class I. Although the work environment was still categorized as control class II after the second intervention, this intervention led to the further improvements.
The hardware and software interventions and safe working habits were effective in improving the work environment.
甲醛在病理实验室中被常规使用。美日两国机构确定的甲醛阈限值为 0.1ppm,与室内空气质量指导值(0.08ppm)相近。因此,维持工作场所内低浓度的甲醛势在必行。本研究旨在通过硬件和软件干预来降低一家每年进行约 15000 例病理诊断的医院病理实验室中的甲醛浓度。
尽管该实验室配备了各种通风系统,但甲醛浓度仍然很高。根据日本工作环境测量系统,工作场所被归类为控制类 III 级,表明需要改善工作条件。首先,采取了工程控制措施,并要求工作人员不要阻挡通风系统,不要让废液箱敞开。然而,工作场所仍需要进一步改善。接下来,我们使用摄像头和甲醛探测器,根据所进行的操作类型,尝试通过视觉教育让工作人员了解从样本容器中排放了多少甲醛。
第一次干预后,工作场所改善至控制类 II 级。控制类 II 表示工作场所条件处于 I 级和 III 级之间;良好的工作场所条件被归类为 I 级。尽管第二次干预后工作环境仍被归类为控制类 II,但这一干预措施进一步改善了工作环境。
硬件和软件干预以及安全工作习惯对于改善工作环境是有效的。