Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jan;19(1):143-148. doi: 10.1177/15589447211038681. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.
Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.
QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, < .01).
Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.
患有 C6-7 神经根病和腕管正中神经压迫的双重压迫(DC)综合征患者在减压后比单纯周围神经减压后报告更明显的神经易激惹和无力。我们假设在颈椎和手腕同时减压后的患者报告结果比单一部位减压差。
确定在 5 年内接受前路颈椎减压融合术(ACDF)治疗 C6-C7 神经根病、腕管松解术(CTR)或两者联合治疗的患者。共分析了 477 例患者(157 例 DC、203 例 CTR 和 117 例 ACDF)。术后平均 2 年收集手臂、肩部和手残疾问卷(QuickDASH)、颈部残疾指数和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。
DC 组的 QuickDASH 评分高于 CTR 组(36 对 22,<0.0002)。ACDF 组的术后残疾明显高于 DC 组(50 对 36,<0.017)。ACDF 组与 DC 组在手臂疼痛强度方面无差异,但 CTR 组的手臂疼痛强度明显大于 DC 组(5.7 对 3.6,10 分制,<0.01)。
接受 ACDF 和 CTR 的患者比仅接受 CTR 的患者术后残疾程度更大,但术后功能障碍和疼痛程度比单独接受 ACDF 的患者小,表明颈椎神经根病可能导致术后长期残疾程度更大。此外,CTR 术后手臂疼痛比 DC 患者更大,可能表明这些患者存在未确诊的颈椎神经根病或其他手臂疼痛来源的高发生率。