Macionis Valdas
Independent Researcher, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 20;4:1037376. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1037376. eCollection 2023.
It has been unexplained why chronic pain does not invariably accompany chronic pain-prone disorders. This question-driven, hypothesis-based article suggests that the reason may be varying occurrence of concomitant peripheral compressive proximal neural lesion (cPNL), e.g., radiculopathy and entrapment plexopathies. Transition of acute to chronic pain may involve development or aggravation of cPNL. Nociceptive hypersensitivity induced and/or maintained by cPNL may be responsible for all types of general chronic pain as well as for pain in isolated tissue conditions that are usually painless, e.g., neuroma, scar, and Dupuytren's fibromatosis. Compressive PNL induces focal neuroinflammation, which can maintain dorsal root ganglion neuron (DRGn) hyperexcitability (i.e., peripheral sensitization) and thus fuel central sensitization (i.e., hyperexcitability of central nociceptive pathways) and a vicious cycle of chronic pain. DRGn hyperexcitability and cPNL may reciprocally maintain each other, because cPNL can result from reflexive myospasm-induced myofascial tension, muscle weakness, and consequent muscle imbalance- and/or pain-provoked compensatory overuse. Because of pain and motor fiber damage, cPNL can worsen the causative musculoskeletal dysfunction, which further accounts for the reciprocity between the latter two factors. Sensitization increases nerve vulnerability and thus catalyzes this cycle. Because of these mechanisms and relatively greater number of neurons involved, cPNL is more likely to maintain DRGn hyperexcitability in comparison to distal neural and non-neural lesions. Compressive PNL is associated with restricted neural mobility. Intermittent (dynamic) nature of cPNL may be essential in chronic pain, because healed (i.e., fibrotic) lesions are physiologically silent and, consequently, cannot provide nociceptive input. Not all patients may be equally susceptible to develop cPNL, because occurrence of cPNL may vary as vary patients' predisposition to musculoskeletal impairment. Sensitization is accompanied by pressure pain threshold decrease and consequent mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, which can cause unusual local pain via natural pressure exerted by space occupying lesions or by their examination. Worsening of local pain is similarly explainable. Neuroma pain may be due to cPNL-induced axonal mechanical sensitivity and hypersensitivity of the nociceptive of the nerve trunk and its stump. Intermittence and symptomatic complexity of cPNL may be the cause of frequent misdiagnosis of chronic pain.
长期以来,慢性疼痛为何并非总是伴随易患慢性疼痛的疾病,一直无法解释。这篇以问题为导向、基于假设的文章提出,原因可能是伴随性外周压迫性近端神经病变(cPNL)的发生率各不相同,例如神经根病和卡压性丛神经病。急性疼痛向慢性疼痛的转变可能涉及cPNL的发展或加重。由cPNL诱导和/或维持的伤害性超敏反应可能是所有类型的一般性慢性疼痛以及通常无痛的孤立组织状况(如神经瘤、瘢痕和掌腱膜纤维瘤病)疼痛的原因。压迫性PNL会引发局灶性神经炎症,这会维持背根神经节神经元(DRGn)的过度兴奋性(即外周敏化),从而加剧中枢敏化(即中枢伤害性通路的过度兴奋性)以及慢性疼痛的恶性循环。DRGn过度兴奋性和cPNL可能相互维持,因为cPNL可能由反射性肌痉挛引起的肌筋膜张力、肌肉无力以及随之而来的肌肉失衡和/或疼痛引发的代偿性过度使用导致。由于疼痛和运动纤维损伤,cPNL会使致病性肌肉骨骼功能障碍恶化,这进一步解释了后两个因素之间的相互关系。敏化会增加神经易损性,从而催化这个循环。由于这些机制以及涉及的神经元数量相对较多,与远端神经和非神经病变相比,cPNL更有可能维持DRGn的过度兴奋性。压迫性PNL与神经活动受限有关。cPNL的间歇性(动态)性质在慢性疼痛中可能至关重要,因为愈合(即纤维化)的病变在生理上是无活性的,因此无法提供伤害性输入。并非所有患者都同样容易发生cPNL,因为cPNL的发生率可能因患者对肌肉骨骼损伤的易感性不同而有所差异。敏化伴随着压痛阈值降低以及随之而来的机械性异常性疼痛和痛觉过敏,这会通过占位性病变施加的自然压力或检查引起异常的局部疼痛。局部疼痛加剧也可类似地解释。神经瘤疼痛可能归因于cPNL诱导的轴突机械敏感性以及神经干及其残端伤害感受器的超敏反应。cPNL的间歇性和症状复杂性可能是慢性疼痛经常误诊的原因。