Suppr超能文献

新型 Scheimpflug 设备和 Hartmann-Shack 相差光度计与 Ray-Tracing 相差光度计在正常、圆锥角膜和 CXL 组中的重复性和一致性。

Repeatability and Agreement of a New Scheimpflug Device and a Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer With a Ray-Tracing Aberrometer in Normal, Keratoconus, and CXL Groups.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2022 Mar;38(3):201-208. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220110-01. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess repeatability and agreement of a Scheimpflug topographer and a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer with a ray-tracing aberrometer in normal, keratoconus, and corneal cross-linking (CXL) groups.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, observational study, normal, keratoconus, and CXL groups with 125 eyes in each of the three groups were included. All eyes underwent three sets of measurements, at a single visit, using the Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and iTrace (Tracey Technologies). Keratometry, pachymetry, objective refraction, and total ocular aberrations including root mean square (RMS) lower order aberrations (LOAs), RMS higher order aberrations (HOAs), RMS coma, and spherical aberrations (SA) were analyzed. Objective assessment of haze after CXL was done using the Pentacam AXL Wave. Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest variability, within-subject coefficient of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman analysis assessed 95% limits of agreement and correlation coefficient () determined the strength of the relationship between measurements.

RESULTS

The Pentacam AXL Wave had Sw for keratometry of 0.12 in the normal group and 0.15 in the keratoconus group and lower (poorer) Sw of 0.17 in the CXL group. For pachymetry, Sw was 9.18, 9.53, and 10.11 in the normal, keratoconus, and CXL groups, respectively. Total aberrations had ICCs ranging from 0.88 for RMS HOAs to 0.95 for SA in the normal group, 0.86 for RMS HOAs to 0.92 for SA in the keratoconus group, and 0.72 for RMS HOAs to 0.82 for SA (poorer) in the CXL group. In the normal group, mean differences between the two devices were nonsignificant for all parameters except SA (0.011 ± 0.038 μm, < .01; limits of agreement = -0.09 to 0.07; = 0.87). In the keratoconus group, mean differences were significant in all aberrations except RMS LOAs (-0.27 ± 0.85 μm, = .10; limits of agreement = -3.3 to 3.8; = 0.92). In the CXL group, all parameters varied significantly ( < .006).

CONCLUSIONS

The Pentacam AXL Wave showed comparable repeatability in the normal and keratoconus groups, but was poorer in the CXL group, more so with increasing corneal haze. Both devices can be used interchangeably in normal eyes, except for SA, but not in eyes with keratoconus or CXL for aberration measurements. .

摘要

目的

评估 Scheimpflug topography 与 Hartmann-Shack aberrometer 与 ray-tracing aberrometer 在正常、圆锥角膜和角膜交联 (CXL) 组中的重复性和一致性。

方法

本横断面观察性研究纳入了每组 125 只眼的正常、圆锥角膜和 CXL 三组。所有眼睛均在单次就诊时接受三组测量,使用 Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) 和 iTrace (Tracey Technologies)。分析角膜曲率计、角膜厚度计、客观折射和总眼像差,包括均方根 (RMS) 低阶像差 (LOAs)、RMS 高阶像差 (HOAs)、RMS 彗差和球差 (SA)。使用 Pentacam AXL Wave 对 CXL 后混浊进行客观评估。使用组内标准差 (Sw)、测试-重测变异性、组内变异系数 (COV) 和组内相关系数 (ICC) 评估重复性。Bland-Altman 分析评估 95%一致性界限和相关系数 () 确定测量之间关系的强度。

结果

Pentacam AXL Wave 在正常组中角膜曲率计的 Sw 为 0.12,在圆锥角膜组中为 0.15,在 CXL 组中较低(较差)为 0.17。对于角膜厚度计,Sw 分别为正常组 9.18、圆锥角膜组 9.53 和 CXL 组 10.11。正常组总像差的 ICC 范围为 RMS HOAs 为 0.88 至 SA 为 0.95,圆锥角膜组 RMS HOAs 为 0.86 至 SA 为 0.92,CXL 组 RMS HOAs 为 0.72 至 SA 为 0.82(较差)。在正常组中,两种设备之间的平均差异除 SA(0.011 ± 0.038 μm, <.01;一致性界限 = -0.09 至 0.07; = 0.87)外,所有参数均无统计学意义。在圆锥角膜组中,除 RMS LOAs(-0.27 ± 0.85 μm, =.10;一致性界限 = -3.3 至 3.8; = 0.92)外,所有像差均有统计学意义。在 CXL 组中,所有参数均有显著差异( <.006)。

结论

Pentacam AXL Wave 在正常组和圆锥角膜组中表现出相当的重复性,但在 CXL 组中较差,角膜混浊程度越高越差。两种设备均可在正常眼中互换使用,除了 SA 外,但在有圆锥角膜或 CXL 的眼睛中不能用于像差测量。.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验