• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡杜纳州 COVID-19 轻症和中度病例中伊维菌素和洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗结局的比较。

Comparison of the Ivermectin and Lopinavir/Ritonavir Treatment Outcomes among COVID-19 Mild to Moderate Cases in Kaduna State.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Kaduna State University, Kaduna State, Nigeria.

Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna State, Nigeria.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 2022 Feb 28;39(2):140-146.

PMID:35278050
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ivermectin has been a popular anti-parasitic drug since the late 1970s. The promising result of in-vitro studies on the antiviral activity of the drug has led clinicians in many countries to use this drug to treat COVID-19 patients. This study determined and compared the mean number of days at clinical recovery for mild to moderate cases of COVID -19 treated with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Alluvia) and Ivermectin at the Kaduna State Infectious Disease Control Centres.

METHODS

This was a comparative cross-sectional study conducted among 300 mild to moderate COVID- 19 cases enrolled for the study. The outcome variables were the time required for the resolution of symptoms from the onset and at commencement of the treatment regimens. Data were collected from patient folders using a questionnaire. Data were analysed with the IBM SPSS Version 25.0 and STATA/SE 13. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The mean recovery time (MRT) from symptom onset was significantly lower for Covid-19 patients treated with ivermectin (7.15±4.18 days) compared to lopinavir/ritonavir (9.7±5.3 days), 95%CI=7.37-9.62. Multivariate logistic regression showed that there was no significant relationship between the patients age (AOR=0.36, 95%CI=0.09-1.49), sex (AOR=0.34,95%CI=0.54-5.93), educational status (AOR=1.04, 95%CI=0.3-3.57), marital status (AOR=0.55,95%CI=0.14-2.11) place of treatment (AOR=1.66, 95%CI=0.54-5.11) and MRT. There was also no significant relationship between patients' comorbid chronic illness (AOR=0.83, 95%CI=0.27-2.61) and MRT.

CONCLUSION

The mean recovery time for COVID-19 patients managed with ivermectin was slightly lower than for the lopinavir/ ritonavir regimen.

RECOMMENDATION

Clinical trials to further prove the efficacy of Ivermectin as a supportive therapy in clinical management of mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 in this setting should be carried out.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 70 年代末以来,伊维菌素一直是一种流行的抗寄生虫药物。该药在体外研究中显示出抗病毒活性的有希望结果,导致许多国家的临床医生将该药用于治疗 COVID-19 患者。本研究旨在确定并比较在卡杜纳州传染病控制中心接受洛匹那韦/利托那韦(Alluvia)和伊维菌素治疗的轻度至中度 COVID-19 患者达到临床康复的平均天数。

方法

这是一项在 300 名轻度至中度 COVID-19 患者中进行的比较性横断面研究,这些患者均被纳入研究。结局变量是从发病开始和开始治疗方案时症状缓解所需的时间。使用问卷从患者档案中收集数据。使用 IBM SPSS 版本 25.0 和 STATA/SE 13 进行数据分析。统计显著性设为 p<0.05。

结果

与洛匹那韦/利托那韦相比,接受伊维菌素治疗的 COVID-19 患者的平均恢复时间(MRT)从症状发作开始显著降低(7.15±4.18 天)95%CI=7.37-9.62。多变量逻辑回归显示,患者年龄(AOR=0.36,95%CI=0.09-1.49)、性别(AOR=0.34,95%CI=0.54-5.93)、教育程度(AOR=1.04,95%CI=0.3-3.57)、婚姻状况(AOR=0.55,95%CI=0.14-2.11)、治疗地点(AOR=1.66,95%CI=0.54-5.11)和 MRT 之间无显著关系。患者合并慢性疾病(AOR=0.83,95%CI=0.27-2.61)与 MRT 之间也无显著关系。

结论

接受伊维菌素治疗的 COVID-19 患者的平均恢复时间略低于洛匹那韦/利托那韦方案。

建议

应在该环境中进行临床试验,以进一步证明伊维菌素作为轻度至中度 COVID-19 临床管理支持性治疗的疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Ivermectin and Lopinavir/Ritonavir Treatment Outcomes among COVID-19 Mild to Moderate Cases in Kaduna State.卡杜纳州 COVID-19 轻症和中度病例中伊维菌素和洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗结局的比较。
West Afr J Med. 2022 Feb 28;39(2):140-146.
2
Early antiviral treatment in outpatients with COVID-19 (FLARE): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 门诊患者的早期抗病毒治疗(FLARE):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05139-2.
3
The efficacy and safety of Ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.伊维菌素治疗轻中度 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04988-7.
4
Lopinavir-ritonavir versus hydroxychloroquine for viral clearance and clinical improvement in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019.洛匹那韦-利托那韦与羟氯喹治疗轻度至中度 2019 冠状病毒病患者病毒清除和临床改善的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S253-S263. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.224. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Safety and efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in symptomatic patients of Covid-19 infection - a randomised controlled trial (SEV-COVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.抗病毒联合治疗在新冠病毒感染有症状患者中的安全性和有效性 - 一项随机对照试验(SEV-COVID 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 20;21(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04774-5.
6
Potential drug-drug interactions in COVID 19 patients in treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir.洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的 COVID-19 患者中的潜在药物-药物相互作用。
Med Clin (Barc). 2020 Oct 9;155(7):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Efficacy of chloroquine versus lopinavir/ritonavir in mild/general COVID-19 infection: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study.氯喹与洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗轻症/普通 COVID-19 感染的疗效:一项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、随机对照临床研究。
Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04478-w.
8
An open-label randomized controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.一项关于洛匹那韦/利托那韦、洛匹那韦/利托那韦联合 IFN-β-1a 和羟氯喹对 COVID-19 住院患者疗效的开放性随机对照试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1826-1837. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.020. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19.洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗成人重症 COVID-19 患者的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Effectiveness of Interferon Beta 1a, compared to Interferon Beta 1b and the usual therapeutic regimen to treat adults with moderate to severe COVID-19: structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.干扰素 β1a 对比干扰素 β1b 和常规治疗方案治疗中重度 COVID-19 成人患者的效果:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04382-3.