Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
School of Medicine, Ross University, Bridgetown, Barbados.
CJEM. 2022 Apr;24(3):300-312. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00268-2. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Escalation of care is the timely recognition and communication of deterioration in a previously stable patient. Delays in escalating care may lead to unnecessary patient morbidity and mortality. There is currently a paucity of synthesis of work focused on the initiation of escalation of care in the emergency department (ED), where unique challenges may be present. We sought to complete a scoping review to investigate: (1) factors (barriers and/or facilitators) affecting clinicians in escalating care in the ED; and (2) tools that support clinicians in ED escalation of care processes.
We conducted a scoping review guided by the Arksey & O'Malley framework, and in accordance with PRISMA Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL on November 30th, 2020. Extracted data was analyzed via qualitative content analysis. Review and data abstraction were completed by two independent reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved via consensus meetings with a third reviewer.
Of the 4527 unique records identified, 13 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies described standard escalation practices including detection, reporting, and response. Factors influencing escalation of care were described on individual (confidence, comfort, and expertise), interpersonal (communication and the nurse-physician relationship), organizational (workload and staffing), and environmental (distractions and layout) levels. Four ED-specific tools for escalation of care were also identified.
This scoping review identified 13 studies that contained information on processes, factors influencing and/or tools used to facilitate escalation of care in the ED. They may serve as valuable starting points for ED clinicians and administrators who are building or reforming local escalation of care processes.
医疗照护升级是对先前稳定患者病情恶化的及时识别和沟通。医疗照护升级的延迟可能导致不必要的患者发病率和死亡率。目前,针对急诊科(ED)中启动医疗照护升级的工作,综合研究相对较少,而 ED 中可能存在独特的挑战。我们旨在进行范围综述,以调查:(1)影响 ED 中临床医生升级医疗照护的因素(障碍和/或促进因素);(2)支持 ED 中临床医生升级医疗照护流程的工具。
我们根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架以及 PRISMA 范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行了范围综述。于 2020 年 11 月 30 日在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 中进行了搜索。通过定性内容分析对提取的数据进行分析。由两名独立审查员进行综述和数据提取。如有分歧,则通过与第三名审查员举行共识会议解决。
在 4527 条独特记录中,有 13 项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究描述了包括检测、报告和响应在内的标准升级实践。影响医疗照护升级的因素分别在个体(信心、舒适度和专业知识)、人际(沟通和护士-医生关系)、组织(工作量和人员配备)和环境(干扰和布局)层面进行了描述。还确定了 4 种 ED 特定的医疗照护升级工具。
本范围综述确定了 13 项研究,其中包含有关 ED 中升级医疗照护的流程、影响因素和/或工具使用的信息。它们可能为正在建立或改革本地医疗照护升级流程的 ED 临床医生和管理人员提供有价值的起点。