• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找有效且高效的方法将研究进展融入临床自杀风险评估访谈中。

Finding Effective and Efficient Ways to Integrate Research Advances Into the Clinical Suicide Risk Assessment Interview.

作者信息

Rudd M David, Bryan Craig J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 25;13:846244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.846244. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.846244
PMID:35280175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8913708/
Abstract

Research in clinical suicidology continues to rapidly expand, much of it with implications for day-to-day clinical practice. Clinicians routinely wrestle with how best to integrate recent advances into practice and how to do so in efficient and effective fashion. This article identifies five critical domains of recent research findings and offers examples of simple questions that can easily be integrated into a clinician's existing suicide risk assessment interview and related protocol helping inform the risk formulation process.

摘要

临床自杀学的研究持续迅速扩展,其中许多研究对日常临床实践具有启示意义。临床医生常常纠结于如何以最佳方式将最新进展融入实践,以及如何高效且有效地做到这一点。本文确定了近期研究发现的五个关键领域,并给出了一些简单问题的示例,这些问题能够轻松融入临床医生现有的自杀风险评估访谈及相关流程,有助于为风险评估过程提供信息。

相似文献

1
Finding Effective and Efficient Ways to Integrate Research Advances Into the Clinical Suicide Risk Assessment Interview.寻找有效且高效的方法将研究进展融入临床自杀风险评估访谈中。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 25;13:846244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.846244. eCollection 2022.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research.自杀研究中的多元主义与不可通约性。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2020 Apr;80:101247. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Money Questions and the Structural Interview.金钱问题与结构性访谈
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2020 Winter;48(4):407-421. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2020.48.4.407.
5
Individuals at Risk for Suicide.自杀风险个体。
Crisis. 2017 May;38(3):158-167. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000427. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
6
The anatomy of suicidology: a psychological science perspective on the status of suicide research. 2002 Shneidman Award Address.自杀学剖析:从心理学视角看自杀研究现状。2002年施奈德曼奖获奖致辞。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2003 Spring;33(1):9-20. doi: 10.1521/suli.33.1.9.22783.
7
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
8
Ecological Momentary Assessment is a Neglected Methodology in Suicidology.生态瞬时评估是自杀学中一种被忽视的方法。
Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jan 2;21(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004482. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Assessing for Occult Suicidality at Triage: Experiences of Emergency Nurses.在分诊时评估隐匿性自杀倾向:急诊护士的经验
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Sep;44(5):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Randomized Trial Comparing the Electronic Composite Psychosocial Screener YouthCHAT With a Clinician-Interview Assessment for Young People: A Study Protocol.比较电子综合心理社会筛查工具YouthCHAT与临床医生访谈评估对青少年的随机试验:研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jul 31;6(7):e135. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7995.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and implementation of a self-directed violence prevention training program for correctional behavioral health providers: a clinical trial study protocol.为惩教行为健康服务提供者制定和实施自我导向的暴力预防培训计划:一项临床试验研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Aug 8;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01533-0.
2
College students' screening early warning factors in identification of suicide risk.大学生自杀风险识别中的筛查预警因素
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 10;13:977007. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.977007. eCollection 2022.
3
Talking really does matter: Lay perspectives from older people on talking about suicide in later life.交谈确实很重要:老年人对晚年谈论自杀的看法
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;13:1009503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009503. eCollection 2022.
4
Factors of suicidal behavior among inpatients with major depressive disorder: A retrospective case series.重度抑郁症住院患者自杀行为的相关因素:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 23;13:996402. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.996402. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation study of the suicide screening questionnaire-observer rating (SSQ-OR).自杀筛查问卷-观察者评分法(SSQ-OR)的开发与验证研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;13:945051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.945051. eCollection 2022.
6
A Standard Protocol for the Clinical Management of Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior: Implications for the Suicide Prevention Narrative.自杀念头与行为临床管理的标准方案:对自杀预防叙事的启示
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 12;13:929305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.929305. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal-dimensional examination of the Scale for Suicidal Ideation in a cohort of service members in treatment for PTSD.创伤后应激障碍治疗中服役人员自杀意念量表的时程-维度检验。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Oct;13(7):793-801. doi: 10.1037/tra0001030.
2
The Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale: Development and Clinical Application.《简短自杀认知量表:编制与临床应用》
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 14;12:737393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737393. eCollection 2021.
3
Recognizing flawed assumptions in suicide risk assessment research and clinical practice.认识到自杀风险评估研究与临床实践中存在的有缺陷的假设。
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):2186-2187. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002750. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
New data on suicide risk assessment in the emergency department reveal the need for new approaches in research and clinical practice.急诊科自杀风险评估的新数据表明,研究和临床实践需要新方法。
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):1122-1123. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001653. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Depression, suicide risk, and declining to answer firearm-related survey items among military personnel and veterans.军人和退伍军人中的抑郁、自杀风险和拒绝回答与枪支相关的调查项目。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Apr;51(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12694.
6
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screen Version: initial screening for suicide risk in a psychiatric emergency department.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表筛查版:精神科急诊科自杀风险的初步筛查
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 26;52(16):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000751.
7
A Pilot Study Using Frequent Inpatient Assessments of Suicidal Thinking to Predict Short-Term Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior.利用频繁的住院评估自杀思维预测短期出院后自杀行为的初步研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e210591. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0591.
8
Lethal Means Counseling, Distribution of Cable Locks, and Safe Firearm Storage Practices Among the Mississippi National Guard: A Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial, 2018-2020.密西西比国民警卫队中的致命手段咨询、电缆锁分发和安全枪支储存实践:2018-2020 年的析因随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):309-317. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306019. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
Suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviours and self-harm in daily life: A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment studies.日常生活中的自杀念头、自杀行为和自我伤害:生态瞬时评估研究的系统综述
Digit Health. 2020 Nov 3;6:2055207620963958. doi: 10.1177/2055207620963958. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Suicide Case-Fatality Rates in the United States, 2007 to 2014: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.自杀案例在美国的死亡率,2007 年至 2014 年:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 17;171(12):885-895. doi: 10.7326/M19-1324. Epub 2019 Dec 3.