Taylor Sarah N, Fenton Tanis R, Groh-Wargo Sharon, Gura Kathleen, Martin Camilia R, Griffin Ian J, Rozga Mary, Moloney Lisa
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 25;9:793311. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.793311. eCollection 2021.
As part of the Pre-B Project, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate associations between exclusive maternal milk (≥75%) intake and exclusive formula intake and growth and health outcomes in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) preterm infants. The protocols from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Evidence Analysis Center and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist were followed. Thirteen observational studies were included; 11 studies reported data that could be synthesized in a pooled analysis. The evidence is very uncertain (very low quality) about the effect of exclusive maternal milk on all outcomes due to observational study designs and risk of selection, performance, detection, and reporting bias in most of the included studies. Very-low-quality evidence suggested that providing VLBW preterm infants with exclusive maternal milk was not associated with mortality, risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia, as compared with exclusive preterm formula, but exclusive maternal milk was associated with a lower risk of retinopathy of prematurity (very low certainty). Results may change when additional studies are conducted. There was no difference in weight, length, and head circumference gain between infants fed fortified exclusive maternal milk and infants receiving exclusive preterm formula; however, weight and length gain were lower in infants fed non-fortified exclusive maternal milk. Given the observational nature of human milk research, cause-and-effect evidence was lacking for VLBW preterm infants.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=86829, PROSPERO ID: CRD42018086829.
作为“Pre - B项目”的一部分,开展了一项系统评价,以评估极低出生体重(VLBW)早产儿纯母乳喂养(≥75%)和纯配方奶喂养与生长及健康结局之间的关联。遵循了营养与饮食学会证据分析中心的方案以及系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。纳入了13项观察性研究;11项研究报告了可用于汇总分析的数据。由于观察性研究设计以及纳入的大多数研究存在选择、实施、检测和报告偏倚的风险,关于纯母乳喂养对所有结局的影响的证据非常不确定(质量极低)。极低质量的证据表明,与纯早产儿配方奶相比,给极低出生体重早产儿提供纯母乳喂养与死亡率、坏死性小肠结肠炎风险、败血症或发生支气管肺发育不良无关,但纯母乳喂养与早产儿视网膜病变风险较低相关(确定性极低)。当进行更多研究时,结果可能会改变。喂养强化纯母乳喂养的婴儿与接受纯早产儿配方奶的婴儿在体重、身长和头围增长方面没有差异;然而,喂养非强化纯母乳喂养的婴儿体重和身长增长较低。鉴于母乳研究的观察性本质,极低出生体重早产儿缺乏因果关系证据。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=86829,PROSPERO编号:CRD42018086829。