Gao Chang, Miller Jacqueline, Collins Carmel T, Rumbold Alice R
SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Discipline of Paediatrics, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD007090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007090.pub2.
Human milk alone may provide inadequate amounts of protein to meet the growth requirements of preterm infants because of restrictions in the amount of fluid they can tolerate. It has become common practice to feed preterm infants with breast milk fortified with protein and other nutrients but there is debate about the optimal concentration of protein in commercially available fortifiers.
To compare the effects of different protein concentrations in human milk fortifier, fed to preterm infants, on growth and neurodevelopment.
We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search CENTRAL (2019, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE and CINAHL on 15 August 2019. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.
We included all published and unpublished randomised, quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing two different concentrations of protein in human milk fortifier. We included preterm infants (less than 37 weeks' gestational age). Participants may have been exclusively fed human milk or have been supplemented with formula. The concentration of protein was classified as low (< 1g protein/100 mL expressed breast milk (EBM)), moderate (≥ 1g to < 1.4g protein/100 mL EBM) or high (≥ 1.4g protein/100 mL EBM). We excluded trials that compared two protein concentrations that fell within the same category.
We undertook data collection and analyses using the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal. Two review authors independently evaluated trials. Primary outcomes included growth, neurodevelopmental outcome and mortality. Data were synthesised using risk ratios (RR), risk differences and mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We identified nine trials involving 861 infants. There is one trial awaiting classification, and nine ongoing trials. The trials were mostly conducted in infants born < 32 weeks' gestational age or < 1500 g birthweight, or both. All used a fortifier derived from bovine milk. Two trials fed infants exclusively with mother's own milk, three trials gave supplementary feeds with donor human milk and four trials supplemented with preterm infant formula. Overall, trials were small but generally at low or unclear risk of bias. High versus moderate protein concentration of human milk fortifier There was moderate certainty evidence that a high protein concentration likely increased in-hospital weight gain compared to moderate concentration of human milk fortifier (MD 0.66 g/kg/day, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.82; trials = 6, participants = 606). The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of high versus moderate protein concentration on length gain (MD 0.01 cm/week, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03; trials = 5, participants = 547; very low certainty evidence) and head circumference gain (MD 0.00 cm/week, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02; trials = 5, participants = 549; very low certainty evidence). Only one trial reported neonatal mortality, with no deaths in either group (participants = 45). Moderate versus low protein concentration of human milk fortifier A moderate versus low protein concentration fortifier may increase weight gain (MD 2.08 g/kg/day, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.77; trials = 2, participants = 176; very low certainty evidence) with little to no effect on head circumference gain (MD 0.13 cm/week, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.26; I² = 85%; trials = 3, participants = 217; very low certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. There was low certainty evidence that a moderate protein concentration may increase length gain (MD 0.09 cm/week, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.14; trials = 3, participants = 217). Only one trial reported mortality and found no difference between groups (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.17; participants = 112). No trials reported long term growth or neurodevelopmental outcomes including cerebral palsy and developmental delay.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Feeding preterm infants with a human milk fortifier containing high amounts of protein (≥ 1.4g/100 mL EBM) compared with a fortifier containing moderate protein concentration (≥ 1 g to < 1.4 g/100 mL EBM) results in small increases in weight gain during the neonatal admission. There may also be small increases in weight and length gain when infants are fed a fortifier containing moderate versus low protein concentration (< 1 g protein/100 mL EBM). The certainty of this evidence is very low to moderate; therefore, results may change when the findings of ongoing studies are available. There is insufficient evidence to assess the impact of protein concentration on adverse effects or long term outcomes such as neurodevelopment. Further trials are needed to determine whether modest increases in weight gain observed with higher protein concentration fortifiers are associated with benefits or harms to long term growth and neurodevelopment.
由于早产儿所能耐受的液体量有限,仅靠母乳可能无法提供足够的蛋白质来满足其生长需求。用添加了蛋白质和其他营养素的母乳来喂养早产儿已成为常见做法,但对于市售强化剂中蛋白质的最佳浓度仍存在争议。
比较不同蛋白质浓度的母乳强化剂喂养早产儿对其生长和神经发育的影响。
我们采用Cochrane新生儿组的标准检索策略,于2019年8月15日检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL,2019年第8期)、Ovid MEDLINE和CINAHL。我们还检索了临床试验数据库以及检索到的文章的参考文献列表,以查找随机对照试验和半随机试验。
我们纳入了所有已发表和未发表的比较两种不同蛋白质浓度母乳强化剂的随机、半随机和整群随机试验。纳入的早产儿为胎龄小于37周者。参与者可能仅接受母乳喂养,或已添加配方奶。蛋白质浓度分为低浓度(<1g蛋白质/100mL挤出母乳(EBM))、中等浓度(≥1g至<1.4g蛋白质/100mL EBM)或高浓度(≥1.4g蛋白质/100mL EBM)。我们排除了比较两种处于同一类别的蛋白质浓度的试验。
我们采用Cochrane新生儿组的标准方法进行数据收集和分析。两位综述作者独立评估试验。主要结局包括生长、神经发育结局和死亡率。数据采用风险比(RR)、风险差和均值差(MD)进行合并,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。我们采用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了9项涉及861名婴儿的试验。有1项试验等待分类,还有9项正在进行的试验。这些试验大多在胎龄<32周或出生体重<1500g或两者兼具的婴儿中进行。所有试验均使用了源自牛乳的强化剂。2项试验仅用母亲自己的母乳喂养婴儿,3项试验用捐赠人乳进行补充喂养,4项试验用早产儿配方奶进行补充喂养。总体而言,试验规模较小,但一般偏倚风险较低或不明确。母乳强化剂高浓度与中等浓度比较 有中等确定性证据表明,与中等浓度的母乳强化剂相比,高蛋白质浓度的母乳强化剂可能会增加住院期间的体重增加(MD 0.66g/kg/天,95%CI 0.51至0.82;试验=6,参与者=606)。关于高蛋白质浓度与中等蛋白质浓度对身长增加的影响(MD 0.01cm/周,95%CI -0.01至0.03;试验=5,参与者=547;极低确定性证据)和头围增加的影响(MD 0.00cm/周,95%CI -0.01至0.02;试验=5,参与者=549;极低确定性证据),证据非常不确定。仅有1项试验报告了新生儿死亡率,两组均无死亡(参与者=45)。母乳强化剂中等浓度与低浓度比较 中等浓度与低浓度强化剂相比可能会增加体重增加(MD 2.08g/kg/天,95%CI 0.38至3.77;试验=2,参与者=176;极低确定性证据),对头围增加几乎没有影响(MD 0.13cm/周,95%CI 0.00至0.26;I²=85%;试验=3,参与者=217;极低确定性证据),但证据非常不确定。有低确定性证据表明中等蛋白质浓度可能会增加身长增加(MD 0.09cm/周,95%CI 0.05至0.14;试验=3,参与者=217)。仅有1项试验报告了死亡率,发现两组之间无差异(RR 0.48,95%CI 0.05至5.17;参与者=