Nabovati Ehsan, Jeddi Fatemeh Rangraz, Ghaffari Faeze, Mirhoseini Fakhrosadat
Health Information Management Research Center, School of Allied Health Professions, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Department of Health Information Management and Technology, School of Allied Health Professions, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jan 31;11:4. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_21. eCollection 2022.
One of the most commonly used methods for training is simulation. It is important to examine the effects of simulation training of health information systems on the knowledge, attitude, and skill in trainees. This review provided a summary of relevant literature on how simulation training affects the learning of health information systems and determine the features and functional capabilities of existing simulators. Studies and websites using simulation training to teach health information systems were included. Studies were searched through Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, and ISI Web of Science and websites through Google search by the end of 2019. The characteristics of studies, features, and functional capabilities of simulators and effects on learning outcomes were extracted. The included studies and websites were categorized according to different characteristics including simulation types, learning outcome categories, and the effects of simulation training on learning outcomes. The learning outcomes were categorized into four groups: knowledge, attitude, skill, and satisfaction. The effects of interventions on outcomes were categorized into statistically significant positive, positive without statistical argument, no effect (not statistically significant), negative without statistical argument, or statistically significant negative. Ten studies and eight websites that used simulation training to teach health information systems (mainly electronic health record [EHR]) were included. EHR simulation was performed in 80% of the included studies and trainees in 70% of studies were physicians and nurses. All studies were conducted in three developed countries. In the included studies, four learning outcomes (i.e. skill, attitude, knowledge, and satisfaction) were assessed. Ninety percent of the included studies assessed skill-related outcomes, with more than half mentioning significant improvement. Thirty percent of the included studies assessed outcomes-related knowledge and attitude, all of which reported the positive effects of simulation training. The simulators offered a variety of functional capabilities, while all of which simulated the clinical data entry process. In teaching health information systems, especially EHRs, simulation training enhances skill, attitude, knowledge, and satisfaction of health-care providers and students.
培训最常用的方法之一是模拟。考察健康信息系统模拟培训对学员知识、态度和技能的影响很重要。本综述总结了关于模拟培训如何影响健康信息系统学习以及确定现有模拟器的特征和功能能力的相关文献。纳入了使用模拟培训教授健康信息系统的研究和网站。截至2019年底,通过医学期刊数据库(通过PubMed)、Scopus和科学信息研究所(ISI)的Web of Science检索研究,并通过谷歌搜索网站。提取了研究的特征、模拟器的特征和功能能力以及对学习成果的影响。纳入的研究和网站根据不同特征进行分类,包括模拟类型、学习成果类别以及模拟培训对学习成果的影响。学习成果分为四组:知识、态度、技能和满意度。干预对结果的影响分为统计学上显著的积极影响、无统计学依据的积极影响、无影响(无统计学意义)、无统计学依据的消极影响或统计学上显著的消极影响。纳入了十项使用模拟培训教授健康信息系统(主要是电子健康记录[EHR])的研究和八个网站。80%的纳入研究进行了电子健康记录模拟,70%的研究中的学员是医生和护士。所有研究均在三个发达国家进行。在纳入的研究中,评估了四项学习成果(即技能、态度、知识和满意度)。90%的纳入研究评估了与技能相关的成果,其中一半以上提到有显著改善。30%的纳入研究评估了与知识和态度相关的成果,所有这些研究都报告了模拟培训的积极效果。模拟器提供了多种功能能力,所有模拟器都模拟了临床数据录入过程。在教授健康信息系统,尤其是电子健康记录方面,模拟培训提高了医疗保健提供者和学生的技能、态度、知识和满意度。