Zhang Fan, Feng Xingyu, Li Yong, Yan Juan, Zhang Zhilin, Song Xiao
School of Graduate Studies, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China.
Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Feb;13(1):26-39. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-815.
Both neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT) have survival advantages over surgery alone in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG). However, whether there is a difference in the survival benefit between these two treatments and who can benefit from them remains controversial, and there are currently no randomised controlled trials to address these issues. This study compared the survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced AEG receiving nCRT and aCRT.
The data of patients with locally advanced AEG were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015). Patients in the nCRT and aCRT groups were propensity-score matched 1:1, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis between the two groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the prognostic factors.
Of the 1,436 cases diagnosed as locally advanced AEG, we included 442 in the final analysis. The median overall survival (OS) of the nCRT and aCRT cohorts were 30.0 and 25.0 months, respectively (P=0.042), and the median tumour specific survival times were 37.0 and 31.0 months, respectively (P=0.249). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that OS was independently related to age [<60 years ≥70 years, hazard ratio (HR) =0.619, 95% CI: 0.510-0.751, P<0.001; 60-69 years ≥70 years, HR =0.661, 95% CI: 0.536-0.814, P<0.001] and N stage (N2 N1, HR =1.213, 95% CI: 1.002-1.468, P=0.048; N3 N1, HR =1.606, 95% CI: 1.190-2.167, P=0.002). Through stratifying patients by TNM stage, stage IIIB, and N1 stage, we observed that patients receiving nCRT had a better prognosis.
Patients receiving nCRT had significantly better survival than those receiving aCRT. nCRT may offer some therapeutic benefits in patients with IIIB stage AEG.
在食管胃交界腺癌(AEG)患者中,新辅助放化疗(nCRT)和辅助放化疗(aCRT)均比单纯手术具有生存优势。然而,这两种治疗方法在生存获益方面是否存在差异以及哪些患者能从中获益仍存在争议,目前尚无随机对照试验来解决这些问题。本研究比较了接受nCRT和aCRT的局部晚期AEG患者的生存结局。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2004 - 2015年)收集局部晚期AEG患者的数据。nCRT组和aCRT组患者按倾向得分1:1匹配,采用Kaplan - Meier法和对数秩检验对两组进行生存分析。进行单变量和多变量Cox回归模型以确定预后因素。
在1436例诊断为局部晚期AEG的病例中,最终纳入分析442例。nCRT组和aCRT组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为30.0个月和25.0个月(P = 0.042),中位肿瘤特异性生存时间分别为37.0个月和31.0个月(P = 0.249)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,OS与年龄独立相关[<60岁对比≥70岁,风险比(HR)= 0.619,95%可信区间(CI):0.510 - 0.751,P < 0.001;60 - 69岁对比≥70岁,HR = 0.661,95% CI:0.536 - 0.814,P < 0.001]和N分期(N2对比N1,HR = 1.213,95% CI:1.002 - 1.468,P = 0.048;N3对比N1,HR = 1.606,95% CI:1.190 - 2.167,P = 0.002)。通过按TNM分期、IIIB期和N1期对患者进行分层,我们观察到接受nCRT的患者预后更好。
接受nCRT的患者生存明显优于接受aCRT的患者。nCRT可能对IIIB期AEG患者提供一些治疗益处。