• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助听器获取和使用的在线评价:定性主题分析。

Online Reviews of Hearing Aid Acquisition and Use: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.

Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between Lamar University and University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):284-298. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00172. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00172
PMID:35286155
Abstract

PURPOSE

Online reviews have become increasingly common for consumers to share their experiences about products and to assist potential consumers with decision making. The current study was aimed to understand the hearing aid user experience from online consumer reviews using qualitative analysis.

METHOD

The study used a qualitative thematic analysis to analyze open text responses from consumers leaving hearing aid reviews on the http://www.HearingTracker.com website. One thousand three hundred seventy-eight online consumer hearing aid reviews (open-text responses) were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Three domains emerged within the data set, containing 11 themes and 136 subthemes. Domain one (Clinical Processes) contained two themes: Hearing Assessment and Hearing Aid Acquisition. Domain two (The Device) contained five themes: Function, Performance, Physical, Device Management, and Maintenance. Domain three (The Person) contained four themes: Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Personal Adjustment, and Knowledge. The themes gave an understanding that there were a contribution of factors that formed part of a consumers hearing aid user experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing aid users described a range of positive, negative, and neutral descriptions online about their hearing aid user experience and gave advice to fellow hearing aid users helping clinicians improve their hearing aid fitting skills in practice. These findings have implications to future product development as well as service delivery model in terms of developing strategies for fostering patient-centered audiological practice.

摘要

目的

在线评论已成为消费者分享产品体验并协助潜在消费者做出决策的一种越来越常见的方式。本研究旨在使用定性分析来理解来自在线消费者评论的助听器用户体验。

方法

该研究使用定性主题分析来分析消费者在 http://www.HearingTracker.com 网站上留下的助听器评论中的开放文本回复。提取并分析了 1378 份在线消费者助听器评论(开放文本回复)。

结果

数据集内出现了三个领域,包含 11 个主题和 136 个子主题。领域一(临床流程)包含两个主题:听力评估和助听器获取。领域二(设备)包含五个主题:功能、性能、物理、设备管理和维护。领域三(人)包含四个主题:满意度、生活质量、个人调整和知识。这些主题让人们了解到,有一系列因素构成了消费者的助听器用户体验。

结论

助听器用户在网上描述了他们的助听器用户体验的一系列积极、消极和中性描述,并为其他助听器用户提供了建议,帮助临床医生在实践中提高助听器适配技能。这些发现对未来的产品开发以及服务交付模式具有重要意义,有助于制定促进以患者为中心的听力学实践的策略。

相似文献

1
Online Reviews of Hearing Aid Acquisition and Use: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.助听器获取和使用的在线评价:定性主题分析。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):284-298. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00172. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Hearing aid acquisition and ownership: what can we learn from online consumer reviews?助听设备的购买和拥有情况:我们能从在线消费者评论中学到什么?
Int J Audiol. 2021 Nov;60(11):917-926. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1931487. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
3
Experiences With Hearing Health Care Services: What Can We Learn From Online Consumer Reviews?听力保健服务体验:从在线消费者评论中我们能学到什么?
Am J Audiol. 2021 Sep 10;30(3):745-754. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00041. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Experienced hearing aid users' perspectives of assessment and communication within audiology: a qualitative study using digital methods.有经验的助听器用户对听力学评估和交流的看法:使用数字方法的定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Nov;61(11):956-964. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1998839. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Perceptions of Hearing Health Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Satisfied and Dissatisfied Online Reviews.对听力保健的认知:满意和不满意在线评论的定性分析。
Am J Audiol. 2024 Jun 4;33(2):386-410. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00180. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
Consumer Perspectives on Improving Hearing Aids: A Qualitative Study.消费者对改善助听器的看法:一项定性研究。
Am J Audiol. 2024 Sep 3;33(3):728-739. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJA-23-00245. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Hearing Aid Consumer Reviews: A Linguistic Analysis in Relation to Benefit and Satisfaction Ratings.助听设备消费者评价:与受益和满意度评级相关的语言分析。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Sep 10;30(3):761-768. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00061. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
Perceptions Toward Internet-Based Delivery of Hearing Aids among Older Hearing-Impaired Adults.老年听力受损成年人对基于互联网的助听器交付方式的看法。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):441-457. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15058.
9
Factors Associated With Hearing Aid Outcomes Including Social Networks, Self-Reported Mental Health, and Service Delivery Models.与助听器效果相关的因素,包括社交网络、自我报告的心理健康状况和服务提供模式。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Dec 4;32(4):823-831. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-22-00206. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
10
A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions.一项关于智能手机连接助听器的定性案例研究:对患者、临床医生及医患互动的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):506-521. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15153.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Public Perception of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Consumer Reviews.了解公众对非处方助听器的看法:消费者评论的情感与主题分析
OTO Open. 2025 May 21;9(2):e70131. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70131. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Editorial: Trends in digital hearing health and computational audiology.社论:数字听力健康与计算听力学的发展趋势
Front Neurosci. 2024 Nov 26;18:1522600. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1522600. eCollection 2024.