Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Hospital Management, the Third People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 14;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7.
Despite the increasing longevity of the world's population, with an unprecedented rise in the number of people who need palliative care (PC), there has been sparse research regarding palliative care for older people, especially when it comes to comparison of PC between healthcare systems and cultures. The aim of this systematic scoping review was to identify the characteristics of the body of literature and to examine the knowledge gaps concerning PC research for older people (> 60 years) in two healthcare systems and cultures, mainland China and Sweden.
The guidelines PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews), and PICOS (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome) were used. Empirical studies on patients 60 years or older, next of kin or staff participating in a palliative care intervention or setting were included. They were conducted in mainland China or in Sweden during 2007-2019, were published in English and were extracted from seven databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Two independent researchers conducted the selection of studies, data extraction and methodological evaluation. Any disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. The analysis was manifest directed content analysis based on PICOS domains.
Of the 15 studies, four were from mainland China and 11 from Sweden. Both countries included older patients with cancer but also other end-stage diseases such as heart failure and dementia. The studies differed in design, method and the content of the interventions. The study in China based on traditional Chinese medicine concerns traditional Chinese folk music. The six qualitative studies from Sweden were evaluations of five interventions.
Despite the high age of the participating patients, there was no focus on an ageing perspective concerning palliative care. To adapt to the changes taking place in most societies, future research should have increased focus on older persons' need for palliative care and should take account of issues concerning research ethics, ethnicity and culture.
CRD42020078685 , available from.
尽管世界人口的预期寿命不断延长,需要姑息治疗(PC)的人数空前增加,但针对老年人的姑息治疗研究却很少,特别是在比较医疗保健系统和文化中的姑息治疗时。本系统综述的目的是确定文献的特征,并检查有关中国内地和瑞典两个医疗保健系统和文化中老年人姑息治疗研究的知识空白。
使用 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)和 PICOS(患者/人群、干预、比较/对照和结果)指南。纳入 60 岁或以上患者、参与姑息治疗干预或环境的亲属或工作人员的经验研究。这些研究于 2007 年至 2019 年在中国内地或瑞典进行,以英文发表,并从七个数据库中提取:Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Cinahl、PsycInfo、Academic Search Complete 和 Cochrane Library。两名独立研究人员进行研究选择、数据提取和方法学评估。任何分歧均通过与第三名研究人员协商解决。分析是基于 PICOS 领域的显式定向内容分析。
在 15 项研究中,有 4 项来自中国大陆,11 项来自瑞典。两国都包括患有癌症的老年患者,但也包括心力衰竭和痴呆等其他终末期疾病的患者。这些研究在设计、方法和干预内容上存在差异。中国的研究基于传统中医,涉及传统民间音乐。来自瑞典的 6 项定性研究是对 5 项干预措施的评估。
尽管参与研究的患者年龄较大,但姑息治疗方面没有关注老龄化问题。为了适应大多数社会发生的变化,未来的研究应更加关注老年人对姑息治疗的需求,并考虑研究伦理、种族和文化等问题。
注册于 PROSPERO:CRD42020078685,可从以下网址获取。