• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智障老年人的健康老龄化:一项范围综述

Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.

作者信息

El Mrayyan Nadia, Holmgren Marianne, Ahlström Gerd

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O., Box 117, Lund, 221 00, Sweden.

Department of Public Health, College of Health Science, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 27;83(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01528-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01528-0
PMID:40012010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11866571/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing longevity of people with intellectual disability creates a need for a healthy-ageing perspective, translated into evidence-based interventions in this multi-morbidity group. Accordingly, the aim of this scoping review was to identify, summarise and analyse the empirical research on healthy ageing in older adults with intellectual disability.

METHODS

This review was based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and a PICO protocol (Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison/control, and Outcome). Empirical studies in English were included if they concerned older adults with intellectual disability with an average age of at least 45 and were based on a clearly expressed healthy-ageing perspective. An information specialist conducted a search in 11 databases with no geographical or temporal restrictions. Two independent researchers performed study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third researcher. A textual narrative synthesis was based on PICO domains and the seven research questions.

RESULTS

The 11 studies were all from developed countries and had different designs: qualitative, mixed-method and one systematic review. Only three studies highlighted the term "healthy ageing", most used synonymous terms. Eight studies focused on healthy ageing on the individual level, three on the organisational and societal level. The intervention studies in the systematic review were mainly nonrandomised, concerned interventions varying in intensity and duration, considered different research questions and employed different outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight a major knowledge gap concerning evidence-based interventions with a healthy-ageing perspective in the case of older adults with intellectual disability. There is an urgent need to initiate healthy-ageing studies in developing countries, where such people are even more vulnerable to stigma and discrimination than those in developed countries. Our findings confirm the need to scale up healthy-ageing interventions in line with the WHO's ambition to develop evidence-based approaches to optimise the functional capacity of all older people, including older adults with intellectual disability, by 2030.

REGISTRATION

The study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42022337211 (13 June 2022).

摘要

背景

智力残疾者寿命的延长使得有必要从健康老龄化的角度出发,转化为针对这一多发病群体的循证干预措施。因此,本范围综述的目的是识别、总结和分析关于智力残疾老年人健康老龄化的实证研究。

方法

本综述基于PRISMA 2020范围综述指南(PRISMA-ScR)和PICO方案(患者/人群、干预措施、对照/控制组和结局)。纳入的英文实证研究需涉及平均年龄至少为45岁的智力残疾老年人,且基于明确表述的健康老龄化视角。一名信息专家在11个数据库中进行了无地理或时间限制的检索。两名独立研究人员进行了研究筛选、质量评估和数据提取。分歧通过与第三名研究人员协商解决。基于PICO领域和七个研究问题进行了文本叙述性综合分析。

结果

这11项研究均来自发达国家,设计各异:定性研究、混合方法研究和一项系统综述。只有三项研究突出了“健康老龄化”一词,大多数使用了同义词。八项研究关注个体层面的健康老龄化,三项关注组织和社会层面。系统综述中的干预研究主要是非随机的,涉及强度和持续时间各异的干预措施,考虑了不同的研究问题并采用了不同的结局指标。

结论

研究结果凸显了在智力残疾老年人中,从健康老龄化角度出发的循证干预措施存在重大知识空白。迫切需要在发展中国家开展健康老龄化研究,因为在这些国家,这类人群比发达国家的同类人群更容易受到耻辱和歧视。我们的研究结果证实,有必要根据世界卫生组织到2030年制定循证方法以优化所有老年人(包括智力残疾老年人)功能能力的目标,扩大健康老龄化干预措施的规模。

注册情况

该研究已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42022337211(2022年6月13日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab2/11866571/609276335104/13690_2025_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab2/11866571/609276335104/13690_2025_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab2/11866571/609276335104/13690_2025_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review.智障老年人的健康老龄化:一项范围综述
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 27;83(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01528-0.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effectiveness of interventions for improving educational outcomes for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家改善残疾人教育成果干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;21(1):e70016. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70016. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Similarities and differences between China and Sweden regarding the core features of palliative care for people aged 60 or older: a systematic scoping review.中瑞两国 60 岁及以上人群舒缓医疗核心特征的异同:系统范围界定综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 14;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00906-7.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Management of psychotropic medications in adults with intellectual disability: a scoping review.成人智力残疾者精神药物管理:范围综述。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2486-2499. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2121853.

本文引用的文献

1
The key elements of ageing well: Perspectives of middle-aged adults with intellectual disabilities and family carers in South Korea.健康老龄化的关键要素:韩国智障中年成年人及其家庭照顾者的观点
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Sep;47(3):265-275. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2021.1985333. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US.负责任的纳入:对美国具有智力残疾的成年人参与社会行为研究的同意进行的系统评价。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Oct;17(4):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101669. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Investigating inequalities in cancer staging and survival for adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities and cancer: A population-based study in Manitoba, Canada.
调查加拿大马尼托巴省癌症患者中智力或发育障碍成年人的癌症分期和生存的不平等现象:基于人群的研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;88:102500. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102500. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
4
Health equity for persons with disabilities: a global scoping review on barriers and interventions in healthcare services.残疾人人权:医疗服务中的障碍和干预措施的全球范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Nov 13;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02035-w.
5
Good life in old age: Qualitative interviews about ageing with older adults with mild intellectual disability, prior to an educational intervention.老年的美好生活:在教育干预之前,对轻度智力障碍的老年人进行的关于老龄化的定性访谈。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Dec;28(4):1118-1136. doi: 10.1177/17446295231213689. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
6
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of inclusive health and social care research with people with intellectual disabilities: How are co-researchers involved and what are their experiences?包容性健康和社会关怀研究与智力残疾人士:共同研究者如何参与及其经验如何?的系统评价和叙述性综合
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):681-701. doi: 10.1111/jar.13100. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
7
A systematic scoping review and textual narrative synthesis of the qualitative evidence related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.一项关于青少年特发性脊柱侧凸相关定性证据的系统范围综述和文本叙述性综合分析。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2022 May;45:100921. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100921. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
8
Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability study: summary of findings and the protocol for the 10-year follow-up study.健康老龄化和智力残疾研究:发现总结及 10 年随访研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 22;12(2):e053499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053499.
9
Cross-national study of communal attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa: Cameroon vs. Ghana.撒哈拉以南非洲国家社区对智力残疾个体态度的跨国研究:喀麦隆与加纳比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 28;16(9):e0257482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257482. eCollection 2021.
10
Mitigating the impact of the 'silos' between the disability and aged-care sectors in Australia: Development of a Best Practice Framework.减轻澳大利亚残疾和老年护理部门之间“隔阂”的影响:最佳实践框架的制定。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1477-1488. doi: 10.1111/jar.12890. Epub 2021 May 28.