Bardus Marco, El Rassi Rola, Chahrour Mohamad, Akl Elie W, Raslan Abdul Sattar, Meho Lokman I, Akl Elie A
Department of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e15607. doi: 10.2196/15607.
Academics in all disciplines increasingly use social media to share their publications on the internet, reaching out to different audiences. In the last few years, specific indicators of social media impact have been developed (eg, Altmetrics), to complement traditional bibliometric indicators (eg, citation count and h-index). In health research, it is unclear whether social media impact also translates into research impact.
The primary aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the impact of using social media on the dissemination of health research. The secondary aim was to assess the correlation between Altmetrics and traditional citation-based metrics.
We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that evaluated the use of social media to disseminate research published in health-related journals. We specifically looked at studies that described experimental or correlational studies linking the use of social media with outcomes related to bibliometrics. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases using a predefined search strategy (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42017057709). We conducted independent and duplicate study selection and data extraction. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, we summarized the findings through a narrative synthesis.
Of a total of 18,624 retrieved citations, we included 51 studies: 7 (14%) impact studies (answering the primary aim) and 44 (86%) correlational studies (answering the secondary aim). Impact studies reported mixed results with several limitations, including the use of interventions of inappropriately low intensity and short duration. The majority of correlational studies suggested a positive association between traditional bibliometrics and social media metrics (eg, number of mentions) in health research.
We have identified suggestive yet inconclusive evidence on the impact of using social media to increase the number of citations in health research. Further studies with better design are needed to assess the causal link between social media impact and bibliometrics.
各学科的学者越来越多地利用社交媒体在互联网上分享他们的出版物,以触及不同的受众群体。在过去几年中,已开发出社交媒体影响力的特定指标(如替代计量学指标),以补充传统的文献计量指标(如被引频次和h指数)。在健康研究领域,社交媒体影响力是否也能转化为研究影响力尚不清楚。
本研究的主要目的是系统回顾关于使用社交媒体对健康研究传播影响的文献。次要目的是评估替代计量学指标与传统基于引用的指标之间的相关性。
我们进行了一项系统回顾,以识别评估使用社交媒体传播发表在健康相关期刊上的研究的相关研究。我们特别关注描述将社交媒体的使用与文献计量学相关结果联系起来的实验性或相关性研究的研究。我们使用预定义的搜索策略(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42017057709)在医学文献分析与检索系统联机数据库(MEDLINE)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和护理学与健康相关文献累积索引数据库(CINAHL)中进行搜索。我们进行了独立且重复的研究选择和数据提取。鉴于纳入研究的异质性,我们通过叙述性综合总结了研究结果。
在总共检索到的18624条引文中,我们纳入了51项研究:7项(14%)影响力研究(回答主要目的)和44项(86%)相关性研究(回答次要目的)。影响力研究报告的结果不一,存在若干局限性,包括使用强度不当低且持续时间短的干预措施。大多数相关性研究表明,在健康研究中,传统文献计量学指标与社交媒体指标(如提及次数)之间存在正相关。
我们已经找到了关于使用社交媒体增加健康研究中被引频次影响的暗示性但不确定的证据。需要进行设计更好的进一步研究,以评估社交媒体影响力与文献计量学之间的因果关系。