Development and Education of Youth in Diverse Societies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dyslexia. 2022 May;28(2):185-201. doi: 10.1002/dys.1711. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
The assumption that statistical learning is affected in dyslexia has generally been evaluated in children and adults with diagnosed dyslexia, not in pre-literate children with a family risk (FR) of dyslexia. In this study, four-to-five-year-old FR children (n = 25) and No-FR children (n = 33) completed tasks of emerging literacy (phoneme awareness and RAN). They also performed an online non-adjacent dependency learning (NADL) task, based on the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task paradigm. Children's accuracy (hits), signal sensitivity (d') and reaction times were measured. The FR group performed marginally more poorly on phoneme awareness and significantly more poorly on RAN than the No-FR group. Regarding NADL outcomes, the results were less straightforward: the data suggested successful statistical learning for both groups, as indicated by the hit and reaction time curves found. However, the FR group was less accurate and slower on the task than the No-FR group. Furthermore, unlike the No-FR group, performance in the FR group varied as a function of the specific stimulus presented. Taken together, these findings fail to show a robust difference in statistical learning between children with and without an FR of dyslexia at preschool age, in line with earlier work on older children and adults with dyslexia.
人们普遍认为,在阅读障碍中,统计学习受到了影响,而这种影响通常是在被诊断为阅读障碍的儿童和成人中进行评估的,而不是在具有阅读障碍家族风险(FR)的未识字的学龄前儿童中进行评估。在这项研究中,4 至 5 岁的 FR 儿童(n=25)和无 FR 儿童(n=33)完成了新兴读写任务(音素意识和 RAN)。他们还完成了基于序列反应时间(SRT)任务范式的在线非相邻依存关系学习(NADL)任务。测量了儿童的准确性(命中)、信号敏感性(d')和反应时间。FR 组在音素意识和 RAN 方面的表现明显差于 No-FR 组。关于 NADL 结果,结果并不那么直接:数据表明两组都成功地进行了统计学习,这从发现的命中和反应时间曲线中可以看出。然而,与 No-FR 组相比,FR 组在任务中的准确性和反应速度较慢。此外,与 No-FR 组不同的是,FR 组的表现随着特定刺激的呈现而变化。综上所述,这些发现未能表明在学龄前时期,具有阅读障碍 FR 的儿童与没有 FR 的儿童之间的统计学习存在明显差异,这与早期对有阅读障碍的大龄儿童和成人的研究结果一致。