Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1624-1636. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17031. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
There are limited data on the degree of variability in practices surrounding prioritization of referrals for transplant evaluation and criteria for transplant candidacy and their association with transplantation rates. We surveyed transplant programs across the United States between January 2020 and May 2020 to determine current pre-transplantation practices. We examined the relation between these reported practices and the outcomes of waitlisted patients at responding programs between January 2015 and March 2021 using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. We used adjusted Cox models with random effects to accommodate clustering by program. Primary outcomes included living or deceased donor transplantation. Of 172 surveyed programs, 90 participated. Substantial variations were noted in when the candidacy evaluation began (13% reported when eGFR was <30 mL/min/1.73 m and 17% reported no set policy) and the approach to pre-transplantation cardiac workup (multi-modality [58%], stress echocardiogram [20%]). Using adjusted models, a program policy of using other measures of body habitus to determine transplant candidacy rather than requiring patients to meet a body mass index (BMI) threshold of ≤35 kg/m (reference group) for candidacy was associated with a higher hazard of living donor transplantation (HR 1.83 [95% CI 1.10-3.03]). Pre-transplant practices vary substantially across the United States, and select practices were associated with transplantation rates.
关于优先考虑移植评估的推荐意见和移植候选标准的实践差异程度及其与移植率的关系,相关数据有限。我们在 2020 年 1 月至 5 月期间调查了美国各地的移植项目,以确定当前的移植前实践。我们使用 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 数据,检查了这些报告的实践与 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间参与项目的候补患者的结局之间的关系。我们使用具有随机效应的调整 Cox 模型来适应项目聚类。主要结局包括活体或已故供体移植。在接受调查的 172 个项目中,有 90 个参与了调查。在候选资格评估开始的时间(13%的项目报告 eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m 时开始,17%的项目没有设定政策)和进行移植前心脏检查的方法(多模态[58%],应激超声心动图[20%])方面,注意到了明显的差异。使用调整后的模型,与要求患者达到 BMI<35kg/m²(参考组)的候选标准相比,采用其他身体形态指标来确定候选资格的项目政策与活体供体移植的更高风险相关(HR 1.83[95%CI 1.10-3.03])。美国的移植前实践存在很大差异,某些实践与移植率相关。